Placebo injection: Intralipid 20% fat emulsion
Otherplacebo intralipid 20% intramuscular (IM) injection
NCT Number: NCT05139563
The overall aims of SAMURAI (South African Male User Research on Acceptability of Implants and Injections) are to assess acceptability of, and preferences for, novel long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) delivery formulation use among key end-users: heterosexual men and men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) in South Africa, a country most impacted by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence and prevalence. Early involvement of men in product development is an important opportunity to measure and address product acceptability and factors that may influence adherence and to foster male ownership of novel HIV prevention delivery modalities.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Desmond Tutu Health Foundation, Philippi Village, Cape Town, South Africa
Long-acting (LA) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers a promising alternative to existing HIV prevention methods. Research to assess end-user acceptability and actual experiences of novel delivery formulations has neglected, however, to include male perspectives, despite these products being appropriate for use by both men and women. This research aims to assess acceptability of and preferences for novel LA PrEP delivery formulation use among key end users: heterosexual men and men who have sex with men (MSM) in South Africa. Early involvement of men in product development is an important opportunity to measure and address product acceptability and foster male ownership of novel strategies, thereby enhancing potential effectiveness and impact, and broadening male engagement in HIV prevention.
LA PrEP delivered by implant or injection addresses user preferences for simplicity, discretion, and longer dose duration. Currently, there are several PrEP implants in preclinical development and a few injectable formulations in early human phase trials. Biomedical strategies have two core components: the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the delivery mechanism; both of which contribute to acceptability and successful use of products. Research to assess acceptability of placebo use of LA PrEP delivery forms among end users provides insight that may apply to the many products under development. The contraceptive field provides substantial information about potential acceptability and use of LA delivery methods among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, there is a gap in knowledge regarding acceptability of implant and injectable dosing platforms among men, particularly in SSA.
The investigators propose a four-year study to comparatively examine acceptability and preferences of placebo implants and injectables using a crossover-designed mixed methods study among heterosexual men and MSM in Johannesburg and Cape Town, South Africa. The investigators hypothesize that men will find implant use acceptable as a delivery form and no less acceptable than intramuscular injections. First, formative qualitative research with men (n=40) will be conducted to assess knowledge and experiences and inform messages and materials for our Aim 2 and 3 work. Subsequently, a clinical crossover study will be conducted, in which men (n=200) will wear placebo implants for 6 months and have three bimonthly injections in a randomized sequence. Preferences for these delivery forms and product attributes of these LA methods, oral PrEP, and condoms will then be measured using a discrete choice experiment survey.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Note: Genital warts requiring treatment and frequent recurrence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) are considered exclusionary; however, infrequent HSV outbreaks are not. Genital warts requiring treatment are defined as those that cause undue burden or discomfort to the participant, including bulky size, unacceptable appearance, or physical discomfort.
placebo intralipid 20% intramuscular (IM) injection
placebo subdermal implant rod
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of participants' attitudes towards placebo long-acting (LA) PrEP study product physical attributes, expected ease of use, delivery method, and expected physical discomfort
Time frame: Month 6
Assessment of participants' satisfaction with placebo long-acting (LA) PrEP study product physical attributes, ease of use, delivery method, and physical discomfort
Time frame: Month 12
Assessment of participants' satisfaction with placebo long-acting (LA) PrEP study product physical attributes, ease of use, delivery method, and physical discomfort
Time frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
Documentation of initiation and sustained use of placebo LA-PrEP study product
Time frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
Number, relatedness, and severity of reported AEs and serious adverse events
Time frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
Number and severity of Social Harms (i.e., non-medical adverse consequences of participation such as discrimination, stigma, abuse, etc.) reported by participants
Time frame: Month 12
Self-comparison of participants' stated preferences of currently available and possible PrEP delivery methods [i.e., discrete choice experiment (DCE)] implemented at the exit clinical study visit. Investigators will assess preferences for implants as compared with injections; as well as preferences for product-specific attributes of each approach.
Time frame: throughout study completion, average 1 year
Assessed by participant self-reported rating of physical pain from placebo product administration using a 10-point visual analogue scale
RTI International
Other
Acronym: SAMURAI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07202286
Acceptability, Accuracy
Nijmegen, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06659978
Acceptability, Human Factors
Liverpool, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06861400
Acceptability, Adaptive Self-reflection
Syracuse, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06320964
Acceptability, Family Planning
Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
View Trial Details