Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07069881

Sonic vs Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation for Chronic Apical Periodontitis

This randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial aims to directly compare the efficacy of Sonically Activated Irrigation (SAI) versus Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) in the root canal treatment of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis, analyze potential influencing factors, and thereby identify a highly effective and safe root canal irrigation protocol. The ultimate goal is to provide an evidence-based rationale for optimizing irrigation technique selection and overall treatment strategies for chronic apical periodontitis.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–59 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Southern Hospital, Southern Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China

Location status: Recruiting

About this study

Root canal therapy (RCT) is the common treatment for chronic apical periodontitis. Successful outcomes critically depend on the complete eradication of infection within the root canal system. The efficacy of infection control is significantly influenced by the irrigation technique employed. While passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) is a widely utilized form of activated irrigation in clinical practice, it carries inherent risks such as instrument separation and unnecessary dentin removal, limiting its use.

Sonically activated irrigation (SAI) represents a novel irrigation approach. Its polymeric tips circumvent the drawbacks associated with ultrasonic metal tips while delivering comparable irrigation efficiency. However, high-quality randomized controlled clinical evidence supporting its use is currently lacking.

This randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial aims to directly compare the efficacy of SAI versus PUI in root canal treatment of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis and analyze potential influencing factors. The goal is to identify a highly effective and safe root canal irrigation protocol, ultimately providing an evidence-based rationale for optimizing irrigation technique selection and overall treatment strategies for chronic apical periodontitis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Agree to participate in this study and provide informed consent;
  • Age 18-59 years at the time of enrolment;
  • At least one permanent tooth diagnosed with chronic periapical periodontitis at root development stage of Nolla10th;
  • Able to follow up on schedule.

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergies to any medications or materials necessary to complete the procedures;
  • Non-restorable teeth, teeth with severe defects, or teeth that need to be extracted due to orthodontic treatment;
  • Teeth with root canal treatment or vital pulp therapy;
  • Teeth with canal calcification or root canal instrument separation;
  • Teeth with root fracture or vertical root fracture;
  • Tooth with internal or external root resorption;
  • Patients with periodontitis;
  • Patients with orthodontic treatment;
  • Presence of dental phobia;
  • Women who are pregnant;
  • Patients who have taken medications that affect central nervous system, such as tricyclic antidepressant;
  • Patients who have taken medications that affect immune response, such as glucocorticoid or cyclosporin;
  • Patients after radiotherapy of tumor head and neck;
  • Patients who have taken medications that affect curative effect, such as bisphosphonates;
  • Patients with serious systemic diseases that can affect curative effect;
  • Participation in other clinical studies within the past several weeks;
  • Patients who are deemed unsuitable to participate in the study by investigators.

Treatment and study plan

Sonic-Activated Irrigation

Device

Sonic-activated irrigation was performed using the polymer tip (Eddy™, VDW, Germany) activated by an airscaler handpiece.

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation

Device

Passive ultrasonic irrigation was performed using the ultrasonic tip (ACTEON, France) attached to an ultrasonic device (P5 Newton™, ACTEON, France)

Primary outcomes

  1. Therapeutic Effect Evaluation

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

    • Success: A tooth is considered successfully treated when it is asymptomatic, showing no signs of apical infection such as percussion pain, mobility (loosening), tenderness, mucosal swelling, sinus tract, or fistula. Radiographically, the periapical radiolucency must demonstrate either absence or significant reduction.
    • Failure: Treatment is deemed unsuccessful if the tooth remains symptomatic or develops new symptoms of apical infection (e.g., pain, fistula). Radiographically, the size of the periapical radiolucency remains unchanged or shows enlargement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. postoperative pain

    Time frame: day 1 after treatment

    Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during clinical follow-up on day 1 after treatment.

  2. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Periapical Index Scores (CBCTPAI)

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

    The CBCT Periapical Index (CBCTPAI) assigns scores to lesions of chronic apical periodontitis based on the largest dimension measured in three planes (buccopalatal, mesiodistal, diagonal) on CBCT scans.

    0: Intact periapical bone structures;

    • Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 0.5-1 mm;
    • Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 1-2 mm;
    • Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 2-4 mm;
    • Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 4-8 mm;
    • Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 8 mm; Score (n) + E: Expansion of periapical cortical bone; Score (n) + D : Destruction of periapical cortical bone.
  3. The size of the periapical lesion

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

    The size in periapical lesions were quantified using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) at 1-year postoperative compared to preoperative baseline across three anatomical planes: buccopalatal, mesiodistal, and diagonal.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Endodontic Treatment Using Sonic-activated Irrigation and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation to Evaluate Healing in Chronic Apical Periodontitis

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 17, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.