University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava, 70852, Czechia
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Martin Starosta, Assoc. Prof. MUDr., Ph.D.
CONTACT
Petr Jalůvka, MDDr.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07608289
Tooth extraction leads to a substantial reduction in alveolar bone volume, with up to 25% loss within the first year and up to 40-60% within three years. This prospective randomized clinical study aims to compare four commonly used methods of alveolar ridge preservation, evaluating their effectiveness in maintaining bone volume for later prosthetic or implant rehabilitation. Alveolar dimensions will be measured using calibrated CBCT imaging pre-extraction and at six months post-extraction.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ostrava, 70852, Czechia
Location status: Recruiting
Martin Starosta, Assoc. Prof. MUDr., Ph.D.
CONTACT
Petr Jalůvka, MDDr.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The study evaluates four different approaches to alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Eligible patients aged 18-70 years will undergo minimally traumatic extraction. Four treatment modalities will be compared: 1) Spontaneous healing secured with a stitch (control group), 2) Application of collagen sponge (Parasorb Cone, Resorba, Germany) secured with a stitch, 3) Application of a tricalcium phosphate xenograft (Poresorb TCP, Lasak, Czech Republic) covered with a collagen sponge (Parasorb Cone) and secured with a stitch. 4) Application of autogenous dentin, covered with a collagen sponge (Parasorb Cone) and secured with a stitch. Alveolar ridge dimensions will be measured on CBCT before extraction and again after six months. Primary outcomes include the absolute and relative change in ridge width and height at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm below the highest point of the alveolar bone as per Del Canto-Díaz, 2019. Patient factors (periodontal biotype, soft tissue phenotype, and vestibular thickness of the alveolar bone) will be recorded to allow subgroup analysis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Wound after the tooth extraction will be secured with a stitch without addition of any augmentation material.
Wound after the tooth extraction will be filled with a collagen sponge (Parasorb Cone, Resorba, Germany) and secured with a stitch.
Wound after the tooth extraction will be filled with tricalcium phosphate xenograft (Poresorb TCP, Lasak, Czech Republic), covered with a collagen sponge (Parasorb Cone, Resorba, Germany), and secured with a stitch.
Wound after the tooth extraction will be filled with grounded autogenous dentin, covered with a collagen sponge (Parasorb Cone, Resorba, Germany), and secured with a stitch.
Time frame: 6 months
Absolute and relative change in the alveolar bone width at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm below the alveolar crest measured from CBCT imagery.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Ostrava
Other
Socket Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Autogenous Dentin in Comparison With Other Techniques
Acronym: SPAD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07638319
Alveolar Bone Grafting, Alveolar Bone Loss
Caparica, Monte Da Caparica, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT07638358
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Tooth Extraction Site Healing
Caparica, Monte Da Caparica, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT06624982
Alveolar Bone Grafting, Bone Healing
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07095556
Inflammation, Mouth Diseases
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial Details