McKnight Brain Institute
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
NCT Number: NCT05377411
The current study will investigate methods for enhancing cognitive training (CT) effects in healthy older adults by employing a combination of interventions facilitating neural plasticity and optimizing readiness for learning. A pilot randomized clinical trial will examine the individual and combined impact of pairing cognitive training with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). A precision dosing algorithm will be used to determine the appropriate levels of current and location of electrodes to deliver current using tDCS.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
During tDCS, a weak electrical current is applied to the scalp that penetrates skin, bone, CSF and the meninges to stimulate underlying cortical and subcortical tissue
Cognitive Training (CT) will involve up to 10 hours of training over 2-weeks (10 days). CT employs a PositScience BrainHQ suite via its researcher portal. These tasks are web-based and multi-platform (i.e., Windows, Mac). Participants will be randomly assigned to training on 4 tasks focusing on working memory or 4 tasks focusing on attention/speed of processing.
Time frame: Baseline to post test. Post test will occur approximately two weeks following baseline.
Change in working memory performance on the N back working memory MRI task from baseline to post test will be assessed. Post test will occur approximately two weeks following baseline.
The N-back working memory task will be completed during the MRI scan at both baseline and post test assessments. Working memory performance will be defined as a composite of reaction time and accuracy for two back trials. Specifically Target Accuracy percent correct and average correct target reaction time in milliseconds. Percent changes were calculated for Target Accuracy and Reaction Time in the form of (post test-pre test)/pre test. Since the direction of improvement is opposite for the two variables (i.e. higher Accuracy is better and lower Reaction Time is better), the reaction time percent change was multiplied by -1 to ensure a larger number indicated improved performance. To create a composite these two percent changes (Target Accuracy and Reaction Time) were averaged into a single value.
University of Florida
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05610059
Aging, Behavior
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05017129
Aging
Golden, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03814304
Accidental Falls, Aging
Roslindale, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05866393
Aging, Behavior
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details