Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07009418

Smart Angioplasty Research Team-Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Care as Follow-up Strategies in High-Risk Patients After PCI (SMART-CARE)

The aim of the SMART-CARE trial is to compare clinical outcomes between coronary CT angiography (CCTA) versus standard care as follow-up strategies in high-risk patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

SoonChunHyang University Hospital Bucheon, Bucheon-si, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Advancements in drug-eluting stents, physiology-guided treatment decisions, intravascular imaging-guided procedural optimization, and adjunctive medical therapy have significantly improved prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, high-risk patients-particularly those with complex coronary artery lesions or high-risk clinical conditions such as acute myocardial infarction with or without cardiogenic shock at presentation, diabetes mellitus which requires medical treatment (oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin), end-stage renal disease under dialysis, or multi-vascular disease-continue to have a significantly higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events. In this regard, meticulous follow-up, including periodic assessment of clinical and functional status, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), and secondary prevention strategies are important, and current guidelines strongly recommend these measures as a Class I recommendation. However, recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that high-risk patients with complex coronary artery disease or high-risk clinical conditions still experience a continuous increase in adverse cardiovascular events despite optimal secondary prevention. This underscores the need for an optimized surveillance strategy to improve long-term prognosis.

Despite the emphasis on GDMT and secondary prevention in current guidelines, the most effective surveillance strategy after PCI remains uncertain. Existing recommendations primarily address secondary prevention and provide only limited guidance on surveillance for patients with previous coronary revascularization. Based on multiple randomized controlled trials, current guidelines do not recommend routine non-invasive stress testing or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in asymptomatic patients receiving optimized GDMT (Class III, Level of Evidence B-R). However, this recommendation lacks direct evidence evaluating CCTA as a surveillance strategy after PCI. In patients with prior coronary revascularization, CCTA is currently recommended for assessing bypass graft or stent patency only in symptomatic patients (Class IIa), with limited supporting evidence (Level of Evidence B in ESC guidelines and Level of Evidence B-NR in ACC/AHA guidelines).

Notably, the SCOT-HEART trial demonstrated that a CCTA-based treatment strategy was superior to standard care, which relied on clinical and functional assessment along with as-needed non-invasive stress testing, in reducing a composite outcome of coronary heart disease death and non-fatal myocardial infarction. This suggests that a surveillance strategy incorporating CCTA may lead to improved subsequent management decisions, such as preemptive ischemia-driven revascularization or intensified medical therapy, potentially reducing ischemic cardiovascular events and mortality compared to standard guideline-recommended care.

To address this critical gap in clinical practice, we designed the Smart Angioplasty Research Team-Coronary CT Angiography versus Standard Care as Follow-up Strategies in High-Risk Patients after PCI (SMART-CARE) trial. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a CCTA-based surveillance strategy on clinical outcomes compared with standard guideline-directed follow-up in high-risk patients who have undergone PCI.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

① Patients aged 19 years old

② Patients who underwent successful PCI with one or more contemporary drug-eluting stents (stent diameter ≥3mm) or drug-coated balloons.

③ Patients must have at least one of the following criteria of complex coronary artery lesions or high-risk clinical characteristics:

A. Complex coronary artery lesions:

i. True bifurcation lesion (Medina 1,1,1/1,0,1/0,1,1) with side branch ≥2.5mm size ii. Chronic total occlusion (≥3 months) as target lesion iii. PCI for unprotected left main (LM) disease (LM ostium, body, distal LM bifurcation including non-true bifurcation) iv. Long coronary lesions (used stents or drug-coated balloons ≥38 mm in length) v. Multi-vessel PCI (≥2 major epicardial coronary arteries treated at one PCI session) vi. Multiple devices needed (≥3 more stents or drug-coated balloons per patient) vii. In-stent restenosis lesion as target lesion viii. Severely calcified lesion (encircling calcium in angiography) ix. Left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA) ostial lesion

B. High-risk clinical characteristics:

i. Acute myocardial infarction (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [MI] or non-ST-elevation MI) with or without cardiogenic shock (SCAI Classification ≥C) at presentation ii. Diabetes mellitus which requires medical treatment (oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin) iii. End-stage renal disease under dialysis iv. Combined vascular disease other than coronary artery disease

  • Peripheral artery occlusive disease which is defined as A. Previous aorto-femoral bypass surgery, limb bypass surgery, or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty revascularization of the iliac, or infra-inguinal arteries, or B. Previous limb or foot amputation for arterial vascular disease, or C. History of intermittent claudication and one or more of the following: 1) An ankle/arm blood pressure (BP) ratio < 0.90, or 2) Significant peripheral artery stenosis (≥50%) documented by angiography, or by duplex ultrasound, or D. Previous carotid revascularization or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥50% as diagnosed by duplex ultrasound or angiography.
  • Thoracoabdominal aortic disease which is defined as A. Documented thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm by duplex ultrasound, angiography, or computed tomography angiography B. Previous endovascular or surgical treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

④ Subject who can verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and surveillance strategy alternatives of receiving CCTA and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.

Exclusion criteria

① Advanced chronic kidney disease (Creatinine clearance <30 ml/min/1.73 m2) not on dialysis

  • Known true anaphylaxis to contrast medium (not allergic reaction but anaphylactic shock)
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding ④ Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment) ⑤ Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Treatment and study plan

Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA)

Diagnostic Test

In the surveillance by CCTA group, patients will be evaluated by CCTA at 1 year from index hospitalization. CCTA will be done according to current acquisition guidelines. Downstream management according to the results from CCTA will be performed under recommendations from current guidelines.

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to first event of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    MACE is a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome leading to an urgent revascularization, or stent thrombosis

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause death

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    All-cause death

  2. Cardiac death

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Cardiac death

  3. Non-fatal MI

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Non-fatal MI, defined by Forth Universal definition of MI

  4. Spontaneous MI

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Spontaneous MI, defined by Forth Universal definition of MI

  5. Procedure-related MI (during follow-up period from invasive procedure)

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Procedure-related MI (during follow-up period from invasive procedure), defined by Fourth Universal definition of MI

  6. Hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome leading to an urgent revascularization

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome is defined as a clinical event in which the final diagnosis during unplanned hospitalization is acute coronary syndrome including spontaneous myocardial infarction or unstable angina.

  7. Unplanned revascularization (clinically-driven)

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    All revascularization events will be adjudicated as either clinically-driven or non-clinically-driven. Revascularization will be considered clinically-driven if the diameter stenosis of the revascularized coronary segment is ≥50% by QCA and any of the following criteria for ischemia are met:

    • A positive functional study corresponding to the area served by the target lesion; or
    • Ischemic ECG changes at rest in a distribution consistent with the target vessel; or
    • Typical ischemic symptoms referable to the target lesion; or ④ positive invasive physiologic test (fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 or instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89); or ⑤ presence of stenosis with ≥70% diameter stenosis, even in the absence of other criteria Unplanned revascularization refers to revascularization not planned after initial assessments with invasive coronary angiography or non-invasive stress testing, depending on the allocated group, but performed due to clinical circumstances.
  8. Definite stent thrombosis

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Definite stent thrombosis, defined by Academic Research Consortium (ARC) II consensus

  9. Rate of invasive coronary angiography during follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Rate of invasive coronary angiography (with or without showing restenosis or obstructive CAD) during follow-up.

    Angiographic restenosis was defined as a stenosis of at least 50 percent of the minimal luminal diameter in the target-lesion at invasive coronary angiography during follow-up. Obstructive or no obstructive coronary artery disease at invasive coronary angiography is defined as a visually estimated presence or absence of stenosis of 50% or more, as interpreted by the study-site staff, in any major epicardial vessel, including side branches of at least 2.5 mm in diameter.

  10. Rate of revascularization by PCI or CABG during follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Rate of revascularization by PCI or CABG during follow-up

  11. Procedure-related complications from invasive procedure during follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Procedure-related complications from invasive procedure during follow-up

  12. Cerebrovascular accidents

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Cerebrovascular accidents (ischemic or hemorrhagic)

  13. Contrast-induced nephropathy or contrast-associated hypersensitivity reaction

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Contrast-induced nephropathy, defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.5mg/dL or ≥25% from baseline within 48-72 hours after contrast agent exposure or contrast-associated hypersensitivity reaction

  14. Total medical cost

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    Total medical cost

  15. A composite of death or non-fatal MI

    Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment

    A composite of death or non-fatal MI

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Joo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+82234102575

Ki-Hong Choi, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+82234102575

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Samsung Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Standard Care in High-Risk Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Acronym: SMART-CARE

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2031
Study completion
2032
First posted
Jun 6, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.