Fuwai Hospital, CAMS & PUMC
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07635407
Coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains the standard treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease; however, suboptimal post-PCI physiological outcomes remain common and are associated with adverse cardiovascular prognosis. Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)-based virtual stenting technology enables simulation of post-intervention coronary physiology before PCI and may facilitate individualized optimization of stent implantation strategies.
This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether preprocedural physiological optimization of PCI using coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting technology improves clinical outcomes compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. Eligible patients undergoing PCI for coronary artery disease will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either virtual stenting-guided PCI optimization or standard angiography-guided PCI.
The primary endpoint is major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization within 1 year after PCI. Secondary endpoints include post-PCI physiological optimization, cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, quality of life, procedural safety, and health economic outcomes.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China
Location status: Recruiting
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by coronary angiography remains the current standard treatment approach for coronary artery disease. However, angiographic optimization does not necessarily correspond to physiological optimization, and a considerable proportion of patients experience suboptimal post-PCI coronary physiological results, which are associated with increased risks of adverse cardiovascular events.
Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)-derived physiological assessment provides a non-wire, angiography-based method for functional evaluation of coronary lesions. Recent developments in virtual stenting technology enable simulation of residual coronary physiology after hypothetical stent implantation, thereby allowing preprocedural prediction of post-PCI QFR and optimization of interventional strategies.
The present study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled superiority trial designed to evaluate whether coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting technology for preprocedural physiological optimization improves clinical outcomes compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI.
Approximately 1,472 participants with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either: Virtual stenting-guided PCI optimization; or Standard angiography-guided PCI.
The primary endpoint is 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization.
Secondary endpoints include immediate post-PCI physiological optimization, cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, quality of life assessed by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D), procedural safety, and health economic outcomes.
Participants will be followed at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI. The study will also evaluate concordance between predicted post-PCI QFR derived from virtual stenting and actual postprocedural physiological measurements, as well as changes in operator treatment strategies after physiological optimization.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Preprocedural physiological optimization of PCI using coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting technology based on angiography-derived Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) assessment to guide stent implantation strategy.
Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention performed according to angiographic findings and routine clinical practice without use of virtual stenting-guided physiological optimization.
Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI
Composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization after index PCI.
Time frame: Immediately after PCI
Successful physiological optimization defined as postprocedural TIMI grade 3 flow and post-PCI Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) ≥0.90 in the target vessel immediately after PCI.
Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI
Composite of cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction after index PCI.
Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI
This includes perioperative myocardial infarction and non-fatal myocardial infarction (including target vessel and non-target vessel related myocardial infarction) (30 days, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively).
Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI
Death from any cause, including cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death, or death of undetermined cause.
Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI
Repeat coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) associated with ischemic symptoms, positive functional testing, angiographic stenosis ≥50% with ischemic evidence, or stenosis ≥70% regardless of symptoms.
Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI
Including target-vessel and non-target vessel, ischemia-driven and non-ischemia driven
Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI
Definite or probable stent thrombosis according to ARC-2 definitions, including acute, subacute, late, and very late stent thrombosis.
Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or type 5 bleeding.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI
Quality of life assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI
Quality of Life assessed by EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D).
Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI
Cost-utility evaluation using quality-adjusted life years estimated from EQ-5D utility scores using the Japanese time trade-off (TTO) conversion algorithm.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI
Direct medical costs including index hospitalization costs, cardiovascular medication costs, outpatient costs, hospitalization costs, and MACE-related medical expenditures.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Other Gov
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Preprocedural Physiological Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Coronary Imaging-Physiology Fusion-Based Virtual Stenting Technology
Acronym: FAVOR-Virtual
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01132456
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06535568
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Antineoplastic Agents
Milan, MI, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06101862
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), Angina Pectoris
Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05846893
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
View Trial Details