Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07635407

QFR-Guided Virtual Stenting for Preprocedural Physiological Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains the standard treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease; however, suboptimal post-PCI physiological outcomes remain common and are associated with adverse cardiovascular prognosis. Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)-based virtual stenting technology enables simulation of post-intervention coronary physiology before PCI and may facilitate individualized optimization of stent implantation strategies.

This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether preprocedural physiological optimization of PCI using coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting technology improves clinical outcomes compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. Eligible patients undergoing PCI for coronary artery disease will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either virtual stenting-guided PCI optimization or standard angiography-guided PCI.

The primary endpoint is major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization within 1 year after PCI. Secondary endpoints include post-PCI physiological optimization, cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, quality of life, procedural safety, and health economic outcomes.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Fuwai Hospital, CAMS & PUMC

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Ying Song, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

8688396666

About this study

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by coronary angiography remains the current standard treatment approach for coronary artery disease. However, angiographic optimization does not necessarily correspond to physiological optimization, and a considerable proportion of patients experience suboptimal post-PCI coronary physiological results, which are associated with increased risks of adverse cardiovascular events.

Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)-derived physiological assessment provides a non-wire, angiography-based method for functional evaluation of coronary lesions. Recent developments in virtual stenting technology enable simulation of residual coronary physiology after hypothetical stent implantation, thereby allowing preprocedural prediction of post-PCI QFR and optimization of interventional strategies.

The present study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled superiority trial designed to evaluate whether coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting technology for preprocedural physiological optimization improves clinical outcomes compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI.

Approximately 1,472 participants with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either: Virtual stenting-guided PCI optimization; or Standard angiography-guided PCI.

The primary endpoint is 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization.

Secondary endpoints include immediate post-PCI physiological optimization, cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, quality of life assessed by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D), procedural safety, and health economic outcomes.

Participants will be followed at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI. The study will also evaluate concordance between predicted post-PCI QFR derived from virtual stenting and actual postprocedural physiological measurements, as well as changes in operator treatment strategies after physiological optimization.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Diagnosis of coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to current clinical practice.
  • Presence of at least one target coronary lesion considered suitable for PCI and evaluable by angiography-derived Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR).
  • Ability to undergo coronary angiography and PCI. Provision of written informed consent before study participation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindications to PCI or inability to undergo coronary intervention. Severe renal dysfunction or other conditions making angiographic procedures unsuitable.
  • High bleeding risk judged by investigators.
  • Inability to complete follow-up or comply with study procedures.
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year due to non-cardiovascular comorbidities.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that may interfere with study outcomes.
  • Coronary anatomy unsuitable for QFR-based virtual stenting analysis.
  • Any condition judged by investigators to make study participation inappropriate.

Treatment and study plan

Virtual Stenting-Guided PCI Optimization

Procedure

Preprocedural physiological optimization of PCI using coronary imaging-physiology fusion-based virtual stenting technology based on angiography-derived Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) assessment to guide stent implantation strategy.

Standard Angiography-Guided PCI

Procedure

Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention performed according to angiographic findings and routine clinical practice without use of virtual stenting-guided physiological optimization.

Primary outcomes

  1. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

    Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI

    Composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization after index PCI.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-PCI Physiological Optimization

    Time frame: Immediately after PCI

    Successful physiological optimization defined as postprocedural TIMI grade 3 flow and post-PCI Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) ≥0.90 in the target vessel immediately after PCI.

  2. Cardiovascular Death or Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction

    Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI

    Composite of cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction after index PCI.

  3. Myocardial Infarction

    Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI

    This includes perioperative myocardial infarction and non-fatal myocardial infarction (including target vessel and non-target vessel related myocardial infarction) (30 days, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively).

Other outcomes

  1. All-Cause Mortality

    Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI

    Death from any cause, including cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death, or death of undetermined cause.

  2. Ischemia-Driven Repeat Revascularization

    Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI

    Repeat coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) associated with ischemic symptoms, positive functional testing, angiographic stenosis ≥50% with ischemic evidence, or stenosis ≥70% regardless of symptoms.

  3. All revascularization

    Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI

    Including target-vessel and non-target vessel, ischemia-driven and non-ischemia driven

  4. Definite or Probable Stent Thrombosis

    Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI

    Definite or probable stent thrombosis according to ARC-2 definitions, including acute, subacute, late, and very late stent thrombosis.

  5. Major Bleeding Events

    Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI

    Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or type 5 bleeding.

  6. Health-Related Quality of Life - SAQ

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI

    Quality of life assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)

  7. Health-Related Quality of Life - EQ-5D

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI

    Quality of Life assessed by EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D).

  8. Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)

    Time frame: Within 1 year after PCI

    Cost-utility evaluation using quality-adjusted life years estimated from EQ-5D utility scores using the Japanese time trade-off (TTO) conversion algorithm.

  9. Healthcare Costs

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after PCI

    Direct medical costs including index hospitalization costs, cardiovascular medication costs, outpatient costs, hospitalization costs, and MACE-related medical expenditures.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ying Song, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86-10-68314466

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Preprocedural Physiological Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Coronary Imaging-Physiology Fusion-Based Virtual Stenting Technology

Acronym: FAVOR-Virtual

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.