Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04194814

Skin bioMARkers for Atopic Eczema Therapy Evaluation

The study aims to investigate two new non-invasive technologies for assessing skin properties to identify and validate a range of safety biomarkers that may be considered useful as primary outcome measures for evaluating the safety of topical treatments in atopic dermatitis. The method of assessing these biomarker technologies will be to determine whether twice daily treatment with crisaborole (2%) ointment, compared to betamethasone valerate (0.1%) cream, for up to 4 weeks, may cause skin structure or function changes, like skin atrophy, in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Sheffield Dermatology Research, University of Sheffield Medical School, The Royal Hallamshire Hospital

Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF, United Kingdom

About this study

The first-line drug treatment for mild-moderate AD are currently topical corticosteroids (TCS) with recognized efficacy. However, their prolonged or inappropriate use, can lead to local adverse effects. Side-effects of topical corticosteroids comprise a variety of skin changes in the sense of skin atrophy thinning of the skin and in some cases development of telangiectasia, spontaneous scars, folliculitis, striae distensae (stretch marks), contact dermatitis, acne or rosacea depending on potency, galenic formulation, patient age and body area to which the medication will be applied, exposure time.

Assessing the safety (local adverse effects) of current or new treatments and new treatment approaches using existing treatments through noninvasively monitor on possible early skin (subclinical) changes associated with the local clinical adverse effects of treatment may be an effective step for an enhanced AD treatment management.

Primary Aim: To further develop and validate two new non-invasive technologies for the assessment of early sub-clinical skin changes associated with adverse effects and to derive an optimum panel of safety biomarkers for use in future clinical trials of topical anti-inflammatory treatments.

The safety of two topical anti-inflammatory treatments for AD will be compared in this clinical trial, with a focus on early sub-clinical signs: crisaborole 2% ointment and betamethasone valerate 0,1% cream. Step 1 involves the collection of data on the early sub-clinical skin changes using the non-invasive technologies: OCT and FTIR spectroscopy. The data from this study will then be used to identify and refine biophysical biomarkers of skin atrophy and skin barrier disruption in steps 2 and 3.

Secondary Aim: To determine the relative local skin effects of crisaborole (2%) ointment compared to a potent and moderately potent TCS in participants with mild to moderate AD. The focus is on 'early biomarkers' of 'local skin changes'and not clinical efficacy, which has been established in previous trials.

Rationale for selecting the two comparators are related to prescription behaviors in UK (Betamethasone valerate 0,1% cream) and with no reported TCS-like local adverse effects profile (crisaborole 2% ointment)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Volunteers with AD defined according to the UK working party diagnostic criteria
  • Male or female aged 18-65 years old at baseline (Visit 1)
  • Volunteer understands the purpose, modalities and potential risk of the trial
  • Participants able to read and understand English
  • Participants willing to sign the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants with a known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the excipients of the trial preparations.
  • Participants with acne, suntan, birth marks, multiple nevi, tattoos, blemishes or dense body hair that obstruct the test areas.
  • Investigator assessment of eczema severity at the treatment (anatomical) sites is almost clear or greater (score ≥1) based on the Investigators static global assessment scale at screening and baseline. At the start of the study the skin of the test sites (forearms) will therefore be clear (0) of the signs of eczema
  • Participants with a condition that in the opinion of the investigator contradicts participation in the study.
  • Pregnant female participants; breastfeeding female participants; and female participants of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use a highly effective method of contraception as outlined in this protocol for the duration of the study and for at least 28 days after the last dose of investigational product.
  • Use of any topical product on the test areas within 7 days prior to Baseline/Day 1, including cosmetic moisturizers and sunscreen. Participants using any topical products on the test areas within 7 days at the screening visit will be eligible if they are willing and able to wash-out these products for 7 days in total and for the duration of the trial. Such participants will be potentially eligible at screening and will be confirmed as eligible if adequate washout is confirmed at visit 1. Use of moisturizers and/or sunscreen is permitted during the study to manage dry skin and sun exposure in areas surrounding but not on or overlapping the test areas.
  • Participants who have used a tanning bed within 28 days of baseline (visit 1). Participants who have used a sunbed within 28 days at the screening visit will be eligible if they are willing and able to wash-out for 28 days in total and for the duration of the trial. Such participants will be potentially eligible at screening and will be confirmed as eligible if adequate washout is confirmed at visit 1.
  • Participants who have used any medication that could interfere with the trial aim prior to the start of the study (baseline/visit 1). Participants using such medication at the screening visit will be eligible if they are willing and able to wash-out these treatments for the applicable washout period as defined by in section 8.8 'Prior and Concomitant Medication' and for the duration of the trial. Such participants will be potentially eligible at screening and will be confirmed as eligible if adequate washout is confirmed at visit 1.
  • Participants currently participating in another interventional clinical trial.
  • Volunteer is incapable of giving fully informed consent.
  • Participants judged by the PI to be inappropriate for the trial.

Treatment and study plan

crisaborole (2%) ointment

Drug

twice daily application on one forearm for 4 weeks (randomised site allocation)

Other names: Eucrisa

betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream

Drug

twice daily application on one forearm for 4 weeks (randomised site allocation)

Other names: Betnovate cream

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Epidermal Thickness

    Time frame: Day 1 - Day 57

    The difference in the change in epidermal thickness, measured by structural OCT, between the sites treated with crisaborole (2%) ointment and betamethasone valerate (0.1%) cream.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Analysis of Change in Objective Erythema

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57

    Analysis of the difference in the change in skin redness/erythema (relating to tolerability) during and after 28 days treatment determined by Mexameter measured on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57.

    The Mexameter device has a range of 0-999AU (arbitrary units) and the lower the value, the better the condition of the skin. Objective redness can be classified using the following scale: 0-170AU - No erythema; 170-330AU - Minimal erythema; 330-450AU - Diffuse erythema; 450-570AU - High erythema; over 570AU - Extreme erythema

  2. TEWL - Skin Barrier Function

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57

    Analysis of the change in Trans-Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL, relates to skin barrier function) during and after treatment. TEWL measurements on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57.

  3. TEWL - After Tape-stripping

    Time frame: on Day 29, after 28 days treatment

    The difference in skin barrier integrity (TEWLts20) after 28 days treatment. TEWL measurements after tape-stripping (TEWLts20) on day 29

  4. Comparison of TEWL - After Tape-stripping

    Time frame: on Day 29, after 28 days treatment

    The difference in skin barrier integrity (TEWLts20) after 28 days treatment. TEWL measurements after tape-stripping (TEWLts20) on day 29

  5. Skin Dryness

    Time frame: Visual skin dryness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57

    The difference in the change in visual skin dryness during and after treatment. Visual skin dryness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57. Visual skin dryness was scored using the following: 0 - Absent; 1 - Faint scaling, faint roughness and dull appearance; 2 - Small scales in combination with a few larger scales, slight roughness, whitish appearance; 3 - Small and larger scales uniformly distributed, definite roughness, possibly slight redness and possibly a few superficial cracks; 4 - Dominated by large scales, advanced roughness, redness present, eczematous changes and cracks. The lower the visual dryness score, the better the condition of the skin.

  6. Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF)

    Time frame: Day 29

    The difference in Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF, filaggrin breakdown products) levels at the end of treatment.

    3 NMF components were measured: Urocanic acid (UCA), Pyrrolidone carboxylic acid (PCA) and Free amino acids (FAA) and are expressed together as total NMF (tNMF).

  7. Comparison of Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF) Between Treatments

    Time frame: Day 29

    The difference in Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF, filaggrin breakdown products) levels at the end of treatment.

    3 NMF components were measured: Urocanic acid (UCA), Pyrrolidone carboxylic acid (PCA) and Free amino acids (FAA) and are expressed together as total NMF (tNMF).

  8. Change in Visual Redness/Erythema During and After 28 Days Treatment

    Time frame: Visual skin redness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57

    The difference in the change in visual skin redness during and after treatment. Visual skin redness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57 by an experienced grader. Visual skin redness was scored using the following: 0 - No redness; 0.5/+ - Slight patchy erythema, barely perceptible; 1 - Slight uniform erythema, mild erythema; 2 - Moderate uniform erythema, moderate erythema; 3 - Strong erythema, marked erythema. The higher the visual redness score, the more inflamed the skin looks to the naked eye.

Other outcomes

  1. Superficial Plexus Depth

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57

    The difference in the change in superficial plexus depth (μm) measured by angiographic OCT.

  2. Blood Vessel Diameter

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.

    The difference in the mean blood vessel diameter (μm) measured by angiographic OCT.

  3. Blood Vessel Density

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.

    The difference in the change in blood vessel density (segments/mm²) measured by angiographic OCT. Angiographic OCT images taken on Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.

  4. Collagen Matrix Index

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 29.

    The difference in the change in collagen matrix index measured by polarisation sensitive (PS-)OCT. This metric relates to the arrangement and density of collagen fibres within the skin and is informed by birefringence data. Inhibition of collagen synthesis is an adverse effect associated with epidermal atrophy that occurs following long-term use of topical corticosteroids. There is no range for this measurement. The higher the level of change, the more damage has been done to the epidermis.

  5. Carboxylate 1 Levels

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.

    The difference in the change in carboxylate 1 levels (indirect measure of NMF levels, not to be confused with direct quantification from stratum corneum samples by HPLC) in the stratum corneum measured by FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR spectra of the skin surface taken on Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.

    Carboxylate 1 is a component of Natural Moisturising Factors and relates to how well the skin retains water. There is no range for this measurement. The greater the value, the less able the skin is to hold onto water.

  6. Carboxylate 2 Levels

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.

    The difference in the change in carboxylate 2 levels (indirect measure of NMF levels, not to be confused with direct quantification from stratum corneum samples by HPLC) in the stratum corneum measured by FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR spectra of the skin surface taken on Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.

    Carboxylate 2 is a component of Natural Moisturising Factors and relates to how well the skin retains water. There is no range for this measurement. The greater the value, the less able the skin is to hold onto water.

  7. Stratum Corneum Lipid Structure

    Time frame: Day 29

    The difference in stratum corneum lipid structure measured by FTIR spectroscopy in conjunction with tape-stripping. FTIR spectra taken through the stratum corneum during tape-stripping on Day 29.

    Lipid chain structure was assessed by quantifying the mean frequency of the lipid peak at 2850 cm-1 (corresponding to the CH2 group of lipids). There is no range for this measurement. The higher the absorbance, the less ordered the lipid packing and weaker the structural integrity of the skin.

  8. FLG Mutation Carriers

    Time frame: Saliva samples at Day 1

    Number of FLG loss-of-function mutation carriers

  9. Descriptive Tabulations of TEWL by Mutation Status

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57

    Descriptive tabulations of TEWL by mutation status.

  10. Epidermal Thickness by Mutation Status

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.

    Descriptive tabulations of epidermal thickness (structural OCT derived) by mutation status.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Sheffield

Registry information

Official study title

Validation of a Novel Composite of Skin Biomarkers as a Primary Outcome Measure for Evaluating the Safety of Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial (Phase 2) Comparing the Effects of Crisaborole 2% Ointment to Betamethasone Valerate 0.1% Cream on Skin Structure and Function in Participants With Atopic Dermatitis.

Acronym: SMART

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Dec 11, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 18, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.