Sheffield Dermatology Research, University of Sheffield Medical School, The Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT04194814
The study aims to investigate two new non-invasive technologies for assessing skin properties to identify and validate a range of safety biomarkers that may be considered useful as primary outcome measures for evaluating the safety of topical treatments in atopic dermatitis. The method of assessing these biomarker technologies will be to determine whether twice daily treatment with crisaborole (2%) ointment, compared to betamethasone valerate (0.1%) cream, for up to 4 weeks, may cause skin structure or function changes, like skin atrophy, in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
The first-line drug treatment for mild-moderate AD are currently topical corticosteroids (TCS) with recognized efficacy. However, their prolonged or inappropriate use, can lead to local adverse effects. Side-effects of topical corticosteroids comprise a variety of skin changes in the sense of skin atrophy thinning of the skin and in some cases development of telangiectasia, spontaneous scars, folliculitis, striae distensae (stretch marks), contact dermatitis, acne or rosacea depending on potency, galenic formulation, patient age and body area to which the medication will be applied, exposure time.
Assessing the safety (local adverse effects) of current or new treatments and new treatment approaches using existing treatments through noninvasively monitor on possible early skin (subclinical) changes associated with the local clinical adverse effects of treatment may be an effective step for an enhanced AD treatment management.
Primary Aim: To further develop and validate two new non-invasive technologies for the assessment of early sub-clinical skin changes associated with adverse effects and to derive an optimum panel of safety biomarkers for use in future clinical trials of topical anti-inflammatory treatments.
The safety of two topical anti-inflammatory treatments for AD will be compared in this clinical trial, with a focus on early sub-clinical signs: crisaborole 2% ointment and betamethasone valerate 0,1% cream. Step 1 involves the collection of data on the early sub-clinical skin changes using the non-invasive technologies: OCT and FTIR spectroscopy. The data from this study will then be used to identify and refine biophysical biomarkers of skin atrophy and skin barrier disruption in steps 2 and 3.
Secondary Aim: To determine the relative local skin effects of crisaborole (2%) ointment compared to a potent and moderately potent TCS in participants with mild to moderate AD. The focus is on 'early biomarkers' of 'local skin changes'and not clinical efficacy, which has been established in previous trials.
Rationale for selecting the two comparators are related to prescription behaviors in UK (Betamethasone valerate 0,1% cream) and with no reported TCS-like local adverse effects profile (crisaborole 2% ointment)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
twice daily application on one forearm for 4 weeks (randomised site allocation)
Other names: Eucrisa
twice daily application on one forearm for 4 weeks (randomised site allocation)
Other names: Betnovate cream
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 57
The difference in the change in epidermal thickness, measured by structural OCT, between the sites treated with crisaborole (2%) ointment and betamethasone valerate (0.1%) cream.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57
Analysis of the difference in the change in skin redness/erythema (relating to tolerability) during and after 28 days treatment determined by Mexameter measured on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57.
The Mexameter device has a range of 0-999AU (arbitrary units) and the lower the value, the better the condition of the skin. Objective redness can be classified using the following scale: 0-170AU - No erythema; 170-330AU - Minimal erythema; 330-450AU - Diffuse erythema; 450-570AU - High erythema; over 570AU - Extreme erythema
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57
Analysis of the change in Trans-Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL, relates to skin barrier function) during and after treatment. TEWL measurements on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57.
Time frame: on Day 29, after 28 days treatment
The difference in skin barrier integrity (TEWLts20) after 28 days treatment. TEWL measurements after tape-stripping (TEWLts20) on day 29
Time frame: on Day 29, after 28 days treatment
The difference in skin barrier integrity (TEWLts20) after 28 days treatment. TEWL measurements after tape-stripping (TEWLts20) on day 29
Time frame: Visual skin dryness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57
The difference in the change in visual skin dryness during and after treatment. Visual skin dryness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57. Visual skin dryness was scored using the following: 0 - Absent; 1 - Faint scaling, faint roughness and dull appearance; 2 - Small scales in combination with a few larger scales, slight roughness, whitish appearance; 3 - Small and larger scales uniformly distributed, definite roughness, possibly slight redness and possibly a few superficial cracks; 4 - Dominated by large scales, advanced roughness, redness present, eczematous changes and cracks. The lower the visual dryness score, the better the condition of the skin.
Time frame: Day 29
The difference in Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF, filaggrin breakdown products) levels at the end of treatment.
3 NMF components were measured: Urocanic acid (UCA), Pyrrolidone carboxylic acid (PCA) and Free amino acids (FAA) and are expressed together as total NMF (tNMF).
Time frame: Day 29
The difference in Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF, filaggrin breakdown products) levels at the end of treatment.
3 NMF components were measured: Urocanic acid (UCA), Pyrrolidone carboxylic acid (PCA) and Free amino acids (FAA) and are expressed together as total NMF (tNMF).
Time frame: Visual skin redness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57
The difference in the change in visual skin redness during and after treatment. Visual skin redness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57 by an experienced grader. Visual skin redness was scored using the following: 0 - No redness; 0.5/+ - Slight patchy erythema, barely perceptible; 1 - Slight uniform erythema, mild erythema; 2 - Moderate uniform erythema, moderate erythema; 3 - Strong erythema, marked erythema. The higher the visual redness score, the more inflamed the skin looks to the naked eye.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57
The difference in the change in superficial plexus depth (μm) measured by angiographic OCT.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.
The difference in the mean blood vessel diameter (μm) measured by angiographic OCT.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.
The difference in the change in blood vessel density (segments/mm²) measured by angiographic OCT. Angiographic OCT images taken on Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 29.
The difference in the change in collagen matrix index measured by polarisation sensitive (PS-)OCT. This metric relates to the arrangement and density of collagen fibres within the skin and is informed by birefringence data. Inhibition of collagen synthesis is an adverse effect associated with epidermal atrophy that occurs following long-term use of topical corticosteroids. There is no range for this measurement. The higher the level of change, the more damage has been done to the epidermis.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.
The difference in the change in carboxylate 1 levels (indirect measure of NMF levels, not to be confused with direct quantification from stratum corneum samples by HPLC) in the stratum corneum measured by FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR spectra of the skin surface taken on Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.
Carboxylate 1 is a component of Natural Moisturising Factors and relates to how well the skin retains water. There is no range for this measurement. The greater the value, the less able the skin is to hold onto water.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.
The difference in the change in carboxylate 2 levels (indirect measure of NMF levels, not to be confused with direct quantification from stratum corneum samples by HPLC) in the stratum corneum measured by FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR spectra of the skin surface taken on Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.
Carboxylate 2 is a component of Natural Moisturising Factors and relates to how well the skin retains water. There is no range for this measurement. The greater the value, the less able the skin is to hold onto water.
Time frame: Day 29
The difference in stratum corneum lipid structure measured by FTIR spectroscopy in conjunction with tape-stripping. FTIR spectra taken through the stratum corneum during tape-stripping on Day 29.
Lipid chain structure was assessed by quantifying the mean frequency of the lipid peak at 2850 cm-1 (corresponding to the CH2 group of lipids). There is no range for this measurement. The higher the absorbance, the less ordered the lipid packing and weaker the structural integrity of the skin.
Time frame: Saliva samples at Day 1
Number of FLG loss-of-function mutation carriers
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57
Descriptive tabulations of TEWL by mutation status.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57.
Descriptive tabulations of epidermal thickness (structural OCT derived) by mutation status.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Other
Validation of a Novel Composite of Skin Biomarkers as a Primary Outcome Measure for Evaluating the Safety of Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial (Phase 2) Comparing the Effects of Crisaborole 2% Ointment to Betamethasone Valerate 0.1% Cream on Skin Structure and Function in Participants With Atopic Dermatitis.
Acronym: SMART
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07205081
Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Atopic Eczema
Encinitas, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05990725
Atopic Dermatitis, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Augsburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05916365
Atopic Dermatitis, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06585202
Atopic Dermatitis, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details