Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07500727

Skeletal Muscle Aging and Responsiveness in Aged People With MS

The purposes of this study are to: 1) compare baseline muscle and cardiovascular health in older individuals (>60 years old) diagnosed with MS to age-matched people without MS, 2) determine muscle and whole body changes to an exercise training program, 3) determine if the muscle in a more affected leg in individuals diagnosed with MS is different from the muscle of a less affected leg, and 4) if or how individuals diagnosed with MS adapt differently than age-matched people without MS to exercise training. Participation in this study will average 1.5 hours per visit, 3 visits per week, for approximately 4 months.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Lena Fuentes

CONTACT

[email protected]

4052717745

About this study

Disease-modifying therapies (DMT) are effective in reducing the risk of developing additional debilitating symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS) and slowing disease progression, leading to better functional mobility outcomes and quality of life. As a result, people with MS (PwMS) are now more likely to maintain independence into their later years. Since older PwMS maintaining independence is a relatively recent phenomenon, there is virtually nothing known about how MS exacerbates the age-related loss of muscle mass and function (i.e., sarcopenia) or how PwMS adapt to interventions, such as exercise, that slow age-related declines. In addition, PwMS are known to be highly heterogeneous in functional ability, fatigue, and other physical factors. The investigators do not yet understand the aging trajectory in PwMS and if current treatment guidelines for aged individuals for overall health, including maintaining muscle mass and function, are effective in aged PwMS.

Aging-related functional declines are thought to be caused by hallmark biological processes that ultimately manifest in physical, mental, and metabolic impairments, which compromise healthspan and quality of life. Exercise is a multipotent treatment with promise to mitigate most aging hallmarks. However, there is substantial variability in how individuals respond to exercise training, which is termed inter-individual response heterogeneity (IRH). Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF, VO2max) and low functional muscle quality (fMQ; strength/muscle mass) are multi-system manifestations of the deterioration of the cellular hallmarks of aging, but both CRF and fMQ are modifiable with endurance exercise training (ET) and resistance exercise training (RT). It is yet to be determined how the hallmarks of aging influence IRH. For example, poor responder status could be caused by hallmark deterioration of mitochondrial function, ability to maintain proteostasis, or systemic inflammation.

The investigators are conducting an NIH funded clinical trial that hypothesizes that factors central to aging itself, such as proteostasis, mitochondrial energetics, and inflammation, are contributors to the multidimensional circuitry that determines whether an individual achieves the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in CRF and/or fMQ with exercise training. The goal of the funded trial is to disentangle the complicated relationships between endogenous and exogenous factors that drive response variation to exercise. To accomplish this goal, investigators will use tissue (muscle and blood) sampling, multi-omics, extensive phenotyping, and multidimensional modeling. For the PHF proposal, investigators will leverage this ongoing clinical trial and enroll aged PwMS into the study. The overall goal of the current proposal is to establish baseline muscle and overall health characteristics, responsiveness to exercise training, and factors that give rise to heterogeneity of symptomology in aged PwMS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1. Male or female aged 60 or above 2. Free of unmanaged chronic diseases other than multiple sclerosis 3. No structured exercise program (2 or more bouts/wk) within previous 6 months 4. Cognitively capable of providing informed consent 5. Must meet EDSS score between 2 to 5.5 during screening

Exclusion criteria

  • 1. Neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder, other than multiple sclerosis, that would limit the ability to perform the exercise and/or testing bouts.
  • Cardiopulmonary disorders or reduced breathing capacity
  • Metabolic diseases including markers of liver disease (ALT > 52 U/dl) and type 2 diabetes (HbA1C ≥ 6.5, fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl)
  • Taking any dose of metformin
  • Any other disease or disorder that would influence exercise response (e.g., chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer's, current cancer diagnosis or within 2 yr remission, cerebrovascular)
  • History of Chemotherapy within 5 years
  • Unchangeable anticoagulant (Coumadin, Pradaxa, etc.) use. To be determined by clinical staff.
  • Insulin sensitizing/blood glucose lowering (e.g., metformin) or metabolic (GLP1 agonists) drugs.
  • High dose statin (40 mg and above)
  • Have a non-correctable visual impairment
  • Score less than 29 on the Symbol Digit Test
  • Received Botox for spasticity within the prior 3 months of study participation.
  • Cannot have any adjustments to Baclofen during study participation.
  • Unable to commit to ~4 months required to complete the study.
  • Lidocaine allergy
  • Tobacco use
  • Excessive alcohol consumption (3 drinks/d or 7 drinks/wk for females; 4 drinks/day or drinks/wk for males)
  • BMI greater than 35.0 kg/m2

Treatment and study plan

Exercise trial consisting of both cardiovascular and strength training

Other

All participants will receive 12 weeks of combined ET and RT. All exercise is supervised with a certified trainer. All study staff are CPR trained. Progression of volume and intensity will occur during the ramp-up week and into the first week of training. The ramp-up period increases the number of sets, repetitions, and intensity to limit excessive muscle damage, soreness, and fatigue. Full volume training will be achieved by the end of week one and progression thereafter will be based on intensity. Participants will complete 3x/wk ET and 3x/week RT. Both ET and RT will be progressed on an individual level via monitoring of each session with pragmatic increases in cycling wattage, treadmill speed/grade, and weight lifted as needed. At the completion of training there will be a testing week that repeats the battery of testing completed during the wash-in period to determine responder status by the a priori designated MCIDs for CRF and fMQ.

Other names: endurance, strength

Primary outcomes

  1. fMQ

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    Investigators will determine fMQ from bilateral one-repetition maximum (1RM) knee extension strength / bilateral thigh lean mass via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Strength testing will be performed with a study trainer and DXA scanning will occur at Oklahoma Children's Hospital OU Health.

  2. CRF

    Time frame: Enrollment to end of study at 18 weeks

    Investigators will test CRF on a cycle ergometer using a continuous ramp protocol and ECG monitoring. The study clinician will monitor the ECG during testing while 1-2 other study personnel are administering the test. The ideal ramp for the individual is based on sex, body size, and initial assessments during familiarization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total and Regional Body Composition

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    Additional clinical phenotyping includes total and regional body composition scans using a GE Lunar iDXA and insulin resistance by HOMA-IR from fasting blood draws obtained from a study phlebotomist. An Octave biomarker panel will also be evaluated from blood draws.

  2. Muscle Biopsy

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12 Muscle Biopsy

    Investigators will use established methods to assess hallmarks of aging. Investigators will assess proteostasis in skeletal muscle using the final muscle biopsy sample from each leg with tracer-based proteomics. Investigators will use high-resolution respirometry on skeletal muscle mitochondria (Oroboros O2K respirometers) to determine both mitochondrial respiratory function and reactive oxygen species generation.

  3. Skeletal Muscle Phenotyping

    Time frame: Week 0, 6, and 12

    For additional skeletal muscle phenotyping, investigators will perform histological analyses of skeletal muscle with immunohistochemical approaches using the well-established methods for cellular morphology, myofiber type distribution and size heterogeneity, fibrosis, vascularization (capillary supply), senescence/DNA damage, the presence of resident stem cells, and inflammatory cells including M1 macrophages10-12. Image analysis will be performed using the automated workflow in MyoVision.

  4. Systemic Inflammation

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

    Systemic inflammation will be assessed in serum samples using the MSD 10-plex cytokine panel. The cytokines tested, GM-CSF, IL-1alpha, IL-5, IL-7, IL-12, IL-15, IL-16, IL-17A, TNF-beta, and VEGF-A each have dynamic detection ranges respectively, 0.16-750 pg/mL, 0.09-278 pg/mL, 0.14-562 pg/mL, 0.12-563 pg/mL, 0.33-2,250 pg/mL, 0.15-525 pg/mL, 2.83-1,870 pg/mL, 0.31-3,650 pg/mL, 0.08-458 pg/mL, and1.12-562 pg/mL. Increased cytokines (high pg/mL) indicates a more active, heightened immune response with low cytokines (low pg/mL) indicating a normal resting immune system state.

  5. Muscle Inflammation

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

    Investigators will also assess muscle inflammation in a targeted manner based on the fold change in expression of 3 receptors (TNFα, Fn14, IL-6) and associated intracellular signaling (p-STAT3, NFKB p-p65).

  6. Blood Biomarkers

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

    Investigators also evaluate biomarkers in the blood using the Octave biomarker panel, a panel that measures 18 biomarkers to assess disease level in PwMS. Each biomarker generates an overall activity (DA) score from 1.0 to 10.0. Low DA score indicates more controlled, lower inflammation. A high DA score indicates high inflammation.

  7. Mobility and Balance

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    Mobility and balance testing will be accomplished via the well-established short physical performance battery (SPPB). The scale is a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 12 with higher scores indicating better lower extremity function.

  8. Basic Cognitive Function and Balance

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    Investigators will assess basic cognitive function (reaction time, impulse control, visual processing speed) and balance with the Sway platform (Sway Medical). A score of 100 indicates perfect stability and lower scores indicate instability with the lowest score being 0.

  9. Participant's Self Evaluation of Physical, Mental, and Social Health

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    Investigators will use the validated Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mental health battery to evaluate participant's perspective on physical, mental, and social health. This test uses a T-score metric (typical range of 20-80) with a mean of 50, and a standard deviation of 10, higher scores indicating higher levels of metric measured with a maximum of >70 indicating severe for negative domains like pain, and scores minimum of <55 being within normal limits/absent of negative domain.

  10. Depression

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    Beck Depression Inventory II will be used to assess the presence and severity of depression symptoms within the past 2 weeks. Minimum score is 0 which indicates no presence of depression, and 63 being the highest score indicating the presence of severe depression.

  11. Circadian Rhythm

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    Circadian rhythm will be assessed using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. Minimum score of 16 indicates evening preference and highest score of 86 indicates morning preference.

  12. Sleep Quality

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a self-reported questionnaire that will be used to evaluate participant's sleep quality. 0 being the lowest score and 21 being the highest, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.

  13. Fatigue

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    Fatigue will be evaluated using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) questionnaire to rate fatigue in three categories: physical, cognitive, and psychosocial. A total score ranging from 0 to 84, where higher scores indicate greater fatigue impacting daily life.

  14. Gait Speed

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    A 10 Metre Walk Test will be administered to evaluate participant's gait speed and functional mobility. The total time taken to walk 10 meters is recorded, with slower speed indicating fall risks and higher speeds indicating better mobility.

  15. Functional Capacity

    Time frame: Week -3 and Week -2

    The 6 Minute Walk Test will be used to evaluate functional capacity, and measures the distance a participant can walk in 6 minutes. Longer distance covered indicates stronger gross functional capacity.

  16. Phenotyping Support with Multidimensional Interindividual Response Heterogeneity

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 13

    To strengthen the phenotyping to support the multidimensional Interindividual Response Heterogeneity circuitry, investigators will use the Oura ring to monitor activity, sleep, mobility, temperature trends, and additional vital signs.

  17. Glucose Monitoring

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

    To strengthen the phenotyping to support the multidimensional Interindividual Response Heterogeneity circuitry, subjects will wear a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for ~7 d durations using the Dexcom G8 at the beginning and end of exercise training.

  18. Dietary Intake

    Time frame: Week -3 to -2, Week 0, Week 6, and Week 12

    Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool will be used to evaluate participant's dietary intake.

  19. Blood Biomarkers

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

    Investigators also evaluate biomarkers in the blood using the Octave biomarker panel, a panel that measures 18 biomarkers to assess disease level in PwMS. To assess inter-tissue communication, investigators will perform plasma EV long and small RNA-Seq, and whole muscle RNA-Seq and ATAC-Seq. All samples will be processed, sequenced, and analyzed.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Bobbette Miller

CONTACT

[email protected]

4052714214

Lena Fuentes

CONTACT

[email protected]

4052717745

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

Other

Registry information

Acronym: MS-M3AX

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.