Centre de Soins Dentaires
Montpellier, 34090, France
NCT Number: NCT05773573
The aim of the study is to compare the skeletal and dental maxillary expansion obtained with an Hyrax tooth-borne expander anchored either on the 2nd deciduous molars (V) or on the 1st permanent molars (6)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–12 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Montpellier, 34090, France
The aim of the study is to compare the skeletal and dental maxillary expansion obtained with an Hyrax tooth-borne expander anchored either on the 2nd deciduous molars (V) or on the 1st permanent molars (6).
The main objective is to compare at the skeletal level the distance between the cephalometric points, right jugal (RJ) and left jugal (JR) (maxillary base).
The secondaries objectives are performed at the dental level by measuring the distance between the maxillary first molars mesio-palatal cusp and the cuspids cups. Molar derotation is also assessed
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The experimental group will have a hyrax rapid maxillary expander anchored on the 2nd deciduous molars (V)
The control group will have a hyrax rapid maxillary expander anchored on the 1st permanent molars (6)
Time frame: 6 months
Difference in skeletal maxillary width measured on frontal cephs (distance between the cephalometric points "right jugal RJ" and "left jugal JR" of the Ricketts analysis) before (V0)/after (V8) rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-borne expander type Hyrax
Time frame: 6 months
Difference before (V0) / after (V8) rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-borne expander type Hyrax of the inter-molar distance (mesiopalatal cusp) assessed on dental casts
Time frame: 6 months
Difference before (V0) / after (V8) rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-borne expander type Hyrax of the inter-canine distance (cuspids cusp) assessed on dental casts
Time frame: 6 months
Difference before (V0) / after (V8) rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-borne expander type Hyrax in the amount of molar derotation (inter-molar angle) assessed on dental casts
Time frame: 1 month
Inter-operator reproducibility assessed by the intra-class correlation coefficient
University Hospital, Montpellier
Other
Comparison of Skeletal and Dental Changes with Hyrax-type Rapid Maxillary Expander Anchored to Permanent (6) Versus Deciduous Molars (V) in Growing Subjects
Acronym: DENTHYRAX
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05543460
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05831722
BAME, Bone Anchored Rapid Maxillary Expansion
Salamanca, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT04225637
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03976609
Cleft Lip, Cleft Lip and Palate
View Trial Details