Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02694900

Single-rescuer Pediatric Resuscitation

The objective of this pilot study was to compare the manual chest compressions (CC) versus CC feedback device TrueCPR vs mechanical CC device LifeLine ARM during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Chest Compression

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Łukasz Szarpak

Warsaw, 00-832, Poland

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • maximum 1 year of work experience in medicine
  • minimum 10 clinical resuscitations
  • paramedics, nurses, physicians

Exclusion criteria

  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases
  • pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Manually chest compressions

Other

Chest compressions performed manually without any device

Cardiopump

Device

Chest compressions performed with Cardiopump

LifeLine ARM

Device

Chest compressions performed using mechanical chest compressions system LifeLine ARM

Primary outcomes

  1. chest compressions effectiveness

    Time frame: 1 day

    the percentage of correct chest compressions relative to the total number of chest compressions

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depth

    Time frame: 1 day

    correct depth according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

  2. Pressure point

    Time frame: 1 day

    correct pressure point according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

  3. Complete pressure release

    Time frame: 1 day

    Complete pressure release measure by manikin software

  4. Rate of chest compressions

    Time frame: 1 day

    correct chest compressions rate according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

  5. Ease-of-use

    Time frame: 1 day

    To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each chest compression method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Warsaw

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Three Different Chest Compressions Methods During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Pilot, Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial

Acronym: SRPR

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Mar 1, 2016
Registry last updated
Mar 15, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.