Far Eastern Memorinal Hospital
New Taipei City, 220, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT06955351
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a time-critical emergency where early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and timely defibrillation using an automated external defibrillator (AED) are key to improving survival and neurological outcomes. Although Taipei has implemented dispatch-assisted CPR, delays remain between arrest recognition and AED application due to manpower and policy limitations. International guidelines, including the Global Resuscitation Alliance's ten steps to improve OHCA outcomes, recommend involving police as first responders. Prior studies from the United States and Switzerland demonstrate that police often arrive before emergency medical services (EMS), underscoring their potential role in reducing response times. However, police have not been officially included in OHCA dispatch systems in any region of Taiwan. This study aims to evaluate the willingness of police officers in New Taipei City to participate in prehospital resuscitation through a structured questionnaire. The survey also explores perceived facilitators and barriers to involvement. Findings will inform future training programs and strategies to promote police integration into prehospital emergency response systems, with the ultimate goal of improving OHCA survival rates.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
New Taipei City, 220, Taiwan
For patients with emergency cardiopulmonary arrest before arriving at the hospital, every second counts, especially good early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, CPR) and early use of automated external defibrillator (Automated External Defibrillator, referred to as AED), which can increase the patient's recovery of autonomous cardiopulmonary opportunity to cycle. After the introduction of online Dispatch-assisted CPR from Taipei, the survival rate and the rate of discharge with good neurology improved. Unfortunately, due to the limitations of manpower space and policies, the proportion and time from the successful identification of cardiopulmonary arrest to the first use of public electric shock is still relatively long. Ten guidelines recommended by the Global Resuscitation Alliance to improve survival for patients with pre-hospital cardiac arrest also recommend including police as first responders. Through more intensive manpower distribution, response times and shock times can be reduced, and these advances have also successfully improved survival rates. According to studies in the United States and Switzerland in 2002 and 2017, respectively, the police arrived at the scene faster than the emergency medical technician, which is also in line with the purpose of reducing reaction time and improving the survival rate of patients. No county or city in Taiwan has officially included the police in the OHCA dispatch. This study uses a questionnaire survey to understand the New Taipei City police's willingness to participate in the first aid and resuscitation of patients with cardiopulmonary arrest before hospitalization. At the same time, we will further analyze and understand the assistance and resistance of participating in emergency resuscitation. After the study is completed, courses such as education and training will be designed according to the results, and efforts will be made to reduce resistance, so that the police can be more involved in pre-hospital emergency resuscitation, in order to further improve the survival chances of patients with pre-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The questionnaire is designed to collect the following information: demographic data (including gender, age, education level, marital status, place of residence, and whether the respondent is a healthcare provider), the respondent's status of basic life support (BLS) training, attitudes and willingness to use an automated external defibrillator (AED), and their knowledge of emergency medical service regulations.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses whether participants are willing to go to the scene of an emergency under the command of the duty center to directly perform CPR and use AED to help patients. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses whether participants are willing to receive alerts from the dispatch center about nearby AED locations and assist in delivering the AED to the emergency scene and using it. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates responses to the question: "Gender." Options include: Male; Female.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome collects data on the participant's year of birth. This is a numerical, free-text entry used to assess age distribution.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates participants' highest attained level of education. Options include: High school; College or vocational school; Master's degree; Doctoral degree.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses the participant's marital status. Options include: Single; Married; Divorced.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome collects data on the participant's length of service. Participants are asked to specify their years of service in both administrative and frontline (field) positions.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates whether participants live with adults aged 65 or older. Options include: Yes - number of people; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses whether participants have heard of an Automated External Defibrillator (AED). Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome investigates whether participants believe they can identify an AED in a public setting. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates the participant's willingness to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use an AED during emergencies. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome identifies concerns participants may have about performing CPR and using an AED. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates whether participants feel confident in their ability to perform CPR. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates whether participants feel confident in their ability to use an AED. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses whether participants believe they can accurately perform CPR. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses whether participants believe they can accurately use an AED. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses whether the participant has ever received training related to CPR and AED use. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates the recency of the participant's latest CPR and AED training. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses the format and total duration (in hours) of the participant's most recent CPR + AED training. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates who participants believe is eligible to use an AED. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates participants' willingness to perform CPR and use an AED on strangers. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome identifies reasons why participants may be unwilling to assist strangers. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses whether participants believe all citizens should be trained in CPR and AED use. Options include: Yes; No; Other (please specify).
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates whether participants are willing to attend a free CPR and AED training course. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses how much time participants are willing to spend attending a free CPR + AED course. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome identifies the main reason participants are not willing to attend a free CPR and AED course. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates whether participants have heard of the Good Samaritan Law. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates whether knowledge of the Good Samaritan Law increases participants' willingness to perform CPR and use an AED. Options include: Yes; No.
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome identifies the reasons why participants may be unwilling to deliver and use an AED during an emergency. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates potential incentives that could increase participants' willingness to deliver an AED to the scene and use it. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome identifies the reasons why participants may be unwilling to perform CPR or use an AED at the scene of an emergency. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome evaluates potential factors that may increase participants' willingness to perform CPR and use an AED at the scene of an emergency. Options include:
Time frame: Baseline
This outcome assesses whether participants believe that police officers performing CPR and using an AED before the fire department or EMS arrives can help the patient. Options include:
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Other
Survey of Willingness of Police Force in New Taipei City to Participate in Prehospital Resuscitation
Acronym: RESPOND
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07524881
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiovascular Diseases
Sultangazi, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02007499
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Arrest
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07023159
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiovascular Diseases
Istanbul, Sultangazi, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06153160
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiovascular Diseases
Maribor, Urban Municipality of Maribor, Slovenia
View Trial Details