Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05569733

Simultaneous Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) in Visual Snow Syndrome

Visual snow syndrome (VSS) is a neurologic condition where patients experience tiny flickering dots in their entire visual field. It has been reported that the brain consumes more glucose in the lingual gyrus (a subdivision of the occipital cortex) and that this also shows increased volume of grey matter (neurons and supporting cells). In this study, the investigators apply fluor-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MR) in patients with VSS and compare this to healthy controls. Aside from an analysis in each brain volume element (voxel), the accuracy of classifying groups based on a volume-of-interest (VOI) analysis of both PET and MR is studied, Lastly, this is also compared to a visual assessment of the PET and MR images.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

Aim : Prospective measurement of brain glucose metabolism and structural integrity in the brain of subjects with visual snow syndrome (VSS). Voxel-based and volume-of interest comparison to age matched healthy controls retrospectively obtained on the same simultaneous PET/MR imaging system.

Hypothesis : 1/ VSS patients show overactivation of parts of the visual system, in particular the lingual gyrus, which is likely related to larger volume of the gyrus on structural imaging. 2/ Discrimination of VSS patients versus controls can be done by visual read of FDG PET and/or volume-of-interest based discriminant analysis.

Methods : Recruitment through neurology practice specialised in VSS, detailed history taking and assessment of in/exclusion criteria, scanning with simultaneous18F-FDG PET/MR Signa GE Healthcare.

Analysis : visual assessment, group-based voxel and volume-of-interest based analysis (FDG PET, volumetry T1 MRI) with appropriate statistics and corrections for multiple regional comparisons. Discriminant analysis on VOI based data. Dual observer scoring of visual data and assessment of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of visual image analysis compared to clinical final diagnosis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

GROUP 1: VSS Patients

Inclusion criteria

  • M/F, age 18-85,
  • diagnosis of VSS by an experienced neurologist : dynamic, continuous, black and white tiny dots in the entire visual field lasting longer than 3 months, with at least two additional visual symptoms

Exclusion criteria

  • other underlying neurological conditions inclusive ophthalmological examinations

GROUP 2 : Controls

Inclusion criteria

  • age 18-85 years, M/F, in general healthy condition
  • normal neurological examination, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 28, Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) score ≤ 9, and a normal structural volumetric MRI.

Exclusion criteria

  • history of major internal pathology, neurological and/or psychiatric disorders (including psychosis, depression, and anxiety),
  • history of frequent migraine attacks, substance abuse or current use of any central acting medication
  • first-degree relatives with dementia.

Treatment and study plan

simultaneous fluor-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI)

Diagnostic Test

All subjects fast at least for 4 hours prior to 18F-FDG injection. 18F-FDG is injected intravenously (150 megabecquerel (MBq)) in standard ambient conditions, supine in a dark, noise free room with eyes and ears open. 18F-FDG PET images are acquired for 20 min on a simultaneous GE Signa 3 Tesla (3T) PET/MR scanner with integrated Time-of-Flight (TOF) (GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA). Simultaneous with the 18F-FDG PET/MR acquisition, zero-echo-time (ZTE) MR data are acquired for attenuation correction and a 3D volumetric T1-weighted BRAVO MR sequence using a vendor supplied high-resolution 8-channel phased array head coil (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, USA).

Primary outcomes

  1. Group difference in regional brain metabolism as assessed with 18F-FDG positron emission tomography

    Time frame: analysis done immediately after imaging

    Visual, voxel- and volume-of-interest based assessment of of FDG PET

  2. Group difference in regional brain volume assessed with volumetric magnetic resonance imaging.

    Time frame: at baseline

    Visual, voxel- and volume-of-interest based assessment of MRI images

Secondary outcomes

  1. Discriminant analysis of PET metabolic differences

    Time frame: at baseline

    Statistical discriminant analysis of FDG between VSS patients and controls

  2. Visual scoring of PET metabolic differences

    Time frame: at baseline

    Visual scoring of FDG between VSS patients and controls

  3. Discriminant analysis of MR volumetric differences

    Time frame: at baseline

    Statistical discriminant analysis of regional MR volumetry between VSS patients and controls

  4. Visual scoring of MR volumetric differences

    Time frame: at baseline

    Visual scoring of regional MR volumetry between VSS patients and controls

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Simultaneous Fluorodeoxyglucose and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (18F-FDG PET/MR) Study of Metabolic and Structural Changes in Visual Snow Syndrome Compared to Healthy Controls

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2022
First posted
Oct 6, 2022
Registry last updated
Jan 27, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.