Akuten Huddinge Sjukhus
Stockholm, Solna, 171 76, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT03509792
This research study is designed to investigate the effects of a simple cognitive task (a memory cue following by playing the computer game "Tetris") on intrusive memories ("flashbacks") and other symptoms after a traumatic event. Patients presenting to a hospital emergency department soon after a traumatic event will be randomly allocated to either the simple cognitive task intervention or control. Participants will be followed up at one week and one month, and where possible 3 and 6 months. It is predicted that participants given the simple cognitive task intervention will develop fewer intrusive memories and less severe clinical symptoms than those who are not. This will inform the potential future development of a simple technique to prevent distressing psychological symptoms after a traumatic event. Implementation aspects in a new hospital context will also be explored. Patients use their smartphone for part of the intervention in the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Stockholm, Solna, 171 76, Sweden
This is an explorative pilot study, which will guide the design of a future Randomised Controlled Trial. The main aim of the present study is not a statistical significance test, the results will be descriptive, and will include pilot analyses to obtain an estimate of effect size between groups of the current primary outcome measure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A memory cue followed by playing the computer game "Tetris" on own smartphone. Options to engage in self-administered booster sessions after day 1.
Smartphone activity for same amount of time.
Time frame: Week 1
Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event recorded by participants in a diary daily (morning, afternoon, evening and night) for 7 days
Time frame: 1 month
Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event recorded by participants in a diary daily (morning, afternoon, evening and night) for 7 days
Time frame: One week and 1, 3, and 6month follow-up
Full scale is a 22-item self-report measure that assesses subjective distress after a traumatic events. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). The IES-R yields a total score (ranging from 0 to 88) and subscale scores are calculated for the Intrusion, Avoidance, and Hyperarousal subscales summed. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Our secondary outcome measure is the Intrusion subscale.
Time frame: One week 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up
The HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher scores indicate worse severity.
Time frame: 1 month follow-up
Measures the perception of stress and the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. The 14 items aims to assess how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded respondents find their lives. The items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("never") to 4 ("very often") and summed to a total score of 56. Seven items concerns positive experiences and are hence reversed in scoring. Higher scores indicate worse severity.
Time frame: [One week and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up]
The Work & Social Adjustment Scale is a simple 5-item measure of general social impairment which grew out of a study of change during psychotherapy. The maximum score of the WSAS is 40, lower scores are better.
Time frame: One week and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up
22 bespoke items including questions about study participation e.g. how burdensome was it to participate in the study?" rated on 9-point scale from 1 (never) to 9 (always); and those about what has happened since the study with a yes/no response e.g. have you had any psychological or medical treatment since our last contact; and items with a free text response field e.g. do you have any comments about what it was like to take part in the study.
Time frame: Day 1, week 1, and 1, 3 and 6 month follow ups, through to study completion
Observation and qualitative interviews with participants, study team and staff regarding implementation of the procedures
Time frame: Day 1
5 item questionnaire (11 item scale from 0 to 10) that rates to what degree the participants finds the intervention credible. High scores indicate greater credibility. A free text response field about activities engaged in during the assigned condition.
Time frame: baseline, one week and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up
A single item measuring perceived health status on a seven-point scale (from very good to very bad). High scores indicate good outcomes.
Time frame: baseline, one week and 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up
Two self rated items: Item 1 measures the extent of being troubled by poor sleep in the last month on a 5 point scale (from not at all to very much), and item 2 measures the number of nights in the week with sleep problems on 5 point scale (from 0-1 to 5-7 nights). Each 5-point scale is reverse scored (0 - 4) then summed. Possible total scores ranges from 0 - 8, with higher values indicative of better sleep.
Time frame: One week 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up
Adverse events and potential side effects associated with intervention
Time frame: One week and 1 month follow-up
7 self rated bespoke items measuring characteristics and sensory modality of intrusive memories: 1 self rated question regarding the presence and the extent of each of 7 sensory modalities in the intrusive memories (visual, auditory, tactile, somatic, olfactory, taste, and other sensations) measured on a scale from 1 (none) to 5 (extreme). 3 self rated items measuring the level of distress, vividness or disruption (functional impairment) associated with the intrusions (11 point scales from 0 to 10). High scores indicate higher level of distress/vividness/disruption.
Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up
Section H of MINI 7.0.0 (a short symptom interview) will be assessed at follow-ups to assess current symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Section H consists of a minimum of 1 and maximum of 19 items, which continue depending on response to previous question). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms
Karolinska Institutet
Other
Preventing Intrusive Memories After Trauma Via a Simple Cognitive Intervention in the Hospital Emergency Department: "EKUT" (Enkel Kognitiv Uppgift Efter Trauma)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04032301
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07027696
Acculturation, Female Genital Mutilation
Saint-Denis, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02512445
Guilt, Mental Disorders
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04186962
Mental Disorders, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Belfast, United Kingdom
View Trial Details