Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07172061

Sigh in Pressure Support Ventilation to Detect Respiratory System Compliance and Lung Recruitability

The goal of this physiological study is to determine whether ventilator-delivered sigh breaths during pressure support ventilation (PSV) provide a reliable bedside index of lung recruitability and can guide PEEP optimization.The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does respiratory system compliance measured at the end of a sigh (Crs_sigh) differ from compliance obtained with an inspiratory hold during an assisted breath (Crs_assisted), and can the Crs_sigh/Crs_assisted ratio indicate recruitability? * Does adjusting PEEP based on the sigh-derived recruitability index improve respiratory mechanics and gas exchange compared with usual clinical PEEP settings?

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ospedale Maurizio Bufalini, Cesena, Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background and RationaleInvasive mechanical ventilation is often necessary in critically ill adults but may contribute to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) if ventilator settings are not individualized. During assisted ventilation (pressure support ventilation, PSV), ongoing patient effort complicates the assessment of PEEP response, PEEP titration, and lung recruitability.Ventilator-delivered sigh breaths (i.e., brief sustained inflations) can improve gas exchange and promote alveolar recruitment, and may permit artifact-free assessment of respiratory mechanics in assisted modes. This study evaluates whether Crs measured at the end of a sigh provides reliable, clinically useful information on recruitability and whether the ratio of Crs during sigh to Crs during an assisted breath (Crs_sigh/Crs_assisted) can guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) optimization.Primary ObjectiveTo assess lung recruitability during PSV by normalizing Crs measured at the end of a sigh to Crs obtained with an inspiratory hold during an assisted breath.Secondary Objectives

  • To quantify the proportion of patients in whom Pplat during assisted breathing is not reliable (non-readable or unstable ≥3 s).
  • To determine whether adjusting PEEP according to the sigh-derived recruitability index improves Crs.

Inclusion criteria

Adults (≥18 years) receiving PSV with the ventilator's sigh function active.Exclusion criteria:

  • Clinical contraindication to increasing PEEP
  • Hemodynamic instability defined as SOFA cardiovascular score ≥3

Protocol OverviewEach participant undergoes two sequential, non-randomized steps:

  • Step 1 (Clinical PEEP): Measurements are performed after ≥15 minutes at the treating team's current PEEP.
  • Step 2 (Clinical PEEP +3 cmH₂O): PEEP is increased by 3 cmH₂O; measurements are repeated after ≥15 minutes of stabilization.

In both steps, a sigh is programmed as a sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds (pressure-controlled), per routine practice and prior literature.Sigh Setting

  • Sigh frequency: 1 sustained inflation every minute.
  • Sigh target: 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds.
  • If end-inspiratory flow did not reach 0 L/min, the inspiratory time of the sigh was extended to ensure an end-inspiratory alveolar pressure of 30 cmH₂O.
  • The sigh pressure was identical in both PEEP steps.

Data CollectionBaseline demographics (age, sex, BMI), comorbidities, and hemodynamics are recorded. At the end of each 15-minute step (baseline and PEEP+3), we perform an end-inspiratory hold and an end-expiratory hold on a tidal assisted breath and measured:

  • Plateau pressure (Pplat): Pplat is considered reliable only if the pressure trace is visually stable (flat) during the inspiratory hold.
  • Static driving pressure: DP_st = Pplat - PEEP.
  • Dynamic driving pressure: DP_dyn = Pressure Support + (ΔP_occ × 0.75), where ΔP_occ is the difference between total PEEP and the low airway pressure during the expiratory-hold maneuver.
  • Tidal volume (Vt).
  • Respiratory system compliance on tidal assisted breath: Crs_tidal = Vt / DP_st.
  • P0.1.
  • Occlusion pressure (P_occ).
  • Pressure Muscle Index: PMI = P_peak - Pplat.
  • Ventilatory Ratio (VR).
  • Arterial blood gas (ABG). Compliance During Sigh and S/T IndexCrs during the mandatory sigh (Crs_sigh) is computed at each step using the sigh volume and pressure recorded once the inspiratory flow reaches 0 L/min and airway pressure (Paw) is visually stable.The S/T index is defined as the ratio Crs_sigh / Crs_tidal.Using baseline Crs_tidal, we estimate the sigh-induced volume (mL):V_sigh,expected = (Psigh_peak - PEEP) × Crs_tidal,baseline.We also derive a compliance valid for the pressure range above Pplat up to the sigh pressure ("over-plateau" compliance):Crs_overplat = (Vt_sigh - Vt_tidal) / (Psigh - Pplat).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥18 years) receiving PSV with the ventilator's sigh function active.

Exclusion criteria

  • Clinical contraindication to increasing PEEP
  • Hemodynamic instability defined as SOFA cardiovascular score ≥3

Treatment and study plan

PSV + sigh (Clinical PEEP and Clinical PEEP + 3 cmH₂O)

Other

Each patient undergoes two sequential 15-minute steps: 1) pressure support ventilation at the clinical PEEP and 2) the same settings with PEEP increased by 3 cmH₂O. A ventilator-delivered sigh is programmed as one sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds every minute. All other ventilator parameters (trigger sensitivity, pressure support level, mandatory breath timing) remain unchanged. At the end of each step, inspiratory and expiratory holds are performed to collect respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gases; compliance during the sigh is calculated once flow is zero and airway pressure is stable.

Primary outcomes

  1. Sigh-to-Assisted Breath Respiratory System Compliance Ratio (Crs_sigh/Crs_assisted)

    Time frame: End of each 15-minute step within a single study session (clinical PEEP; clinical PEEP +3 cmH₂O).

    Ratio of respiratory system compliance at the end of a ventilator-delivered sigh to compliance measured during an inspiratory hold on an assisted tidal breath. This normalized metric indexes recruitability during assisted ventilation; higher values indicate greater recruitability. The primary analysis is the within-patient change in the ratio from clinical PEEP to clinical PEEP +3 cmH₂O.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients with unreliable plateau pressure during assisted breaths

    Time frame: Across both 15-minute steps within the single study session.

    Proportion of patients in whom Pplat cannot be reliably measured (non-readable or visually unstable for ≥3 seconds) during inspiratory hold maneuvers in assisted breathing at either study step.

  2. Association between sigh-derived recruitability index and change in respiratory system compliance

    Time frame: End of each 15-minute step within the single study session

    Correlation between the sigh-to-assisted compliance ratio at clinical PEEP and the within-patient change in compliance after PEEP increase

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AUSL Romagna Rimini

Other

Collaborators

  • Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 15, 2025
Registry last updated
Sep 15, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.