Sonia Bédard
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H5N4, Canada
NCT Number: NCT05427110
Iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) is a condition frequently treated in physiotherapy. The pathophysiology underlying this syndrome is still poorly understood. Ultrasound makes it possible to evaluate the morphology and to quantify, with sonoelastography (SWE), the stiffness of the iliotibial band (ITB). The objective is to determine the feasibility of a cross-sectional study aimed at evaluating the morphometry and stiffness of the ITB in runners with and without a diagnosis of ITBS. Socio-demographic and clinical data will be collected and ultrasound measurements (thickness and stiffness) of the iliotibial band will be performed in supine with the knee positioned at 2 different angles (0° and 30° flexion). Variables such as the recruitment rate/month, the inclusion/exclusion rate, the acceptability of the procedure will be used to characterize the feasibility. The relationship between ultrasound measurements and clinical outcomes will be explored. The results obtained will document feasibility issues and provide preliminary results will lay the groundwork for a large scale study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H5N4, Canada
The iliotibial band (ITB) is a complex structure in which morphometry (shape, thickness, cross-sectional area) and viscoelastic properties remain poorly understood. While some hypothesize that the pain originates from friction of the ITB on the femoral condyle during knee flexion, others affirm that it is rather a compression of the ITB on the tissue underlying fat, which is highly vascularized and innervated. Current treatments in physiotherapy are based, in part, on the theory that stiffness in the ITB may contribute to iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS), resulting in prescription of stretching exercises in most rehabilitation programs. However, the plausibility of this theory remains to be demonstrated with valid and reliable instruments. Standard-mode (B-mode) ultrasound is gaining popularity for assessing ITB morphometry. However, these data remain to be correlated with the clinical symptomatology. Sonoelastography (SWE), on the other hand, is used to assess tissue stiffness. Recent studies have attempted to assess the stiffness of ITB under different experimental conditions, but these have methodological flaws (low power) and they are carried out in an asymptomatic population. This project is a first step to fill the gaps on ITB morphometry and stiffness values and explore the potential association between these factors and the clinical profile of SBIT. The primary objective is to evaluate the study the feasibility of the protocol by documenting the variables associated with this concept. Secondary objectives are: 1) To measure the stiffness of the distal BIT in runners with and without ITBS; 2) Describe the morphometry of the distal BIT in the two groups of runners; 3) Compare ITB morphometry and stiffness between the two groups of runners and 4) Investigate the association between ultrasound variables and ITBS signs and symptoms.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Proportion of included participants / total of contacts
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Proportion of excluded participants / total of contacts
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Proportion of participants who refused to participate / total of contacts
Time frame: Baseline
Time for each evaluation in minutes
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Cost of the patients compensation, ultrasounds gel, staff, in Canadian dollars
Time frame: Baseline
opinion of participant regarding lenght of the procedure, unconfort or pain during the procedure
Time frame: Baseline
Thickness of distal iliotibial band with mode B ultrasound in millimeter
Time frame: Baseline
Stiffness of mid and distal ITB using SWE in kPa or m/s
Time frame: Baseline
Stiffness of TFL muscle belly using SWE in kPa or m/s
Time frame: Baseline
To assess pain intensity using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), 0 to 10 in which 0 mean no pain and 10, the worst pain ever feeled
Time frame: Baseline
To assess knee pain and function using the Anterior knee pain scale (AKPS). 13 questions with a total score of 100 that mean an excellent function.
Time frame: Baseline
To assess knee pain and function using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) with 20 questions with a total score of 80 that mean an excellent function
Time frame: Baseline
To assess retraction of Tensor Fascia Lata(TFL) muscle using Modified Ober Test. Score will be measure with an inclinometer in degree of the hip adduction
Université de Sherbrooke
Other
Cross-sectional Study to Assess Iliotibial Band Morphometry and Stiffness Using Ultrasound Imaging in Runners With and Without Symptoms of Iliotibial Band Syndrome: a Feasibility Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07534605
Cumulative Trauma Disorders, Iliotibial Band Syndrome
Istanbul, Şişli, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07118371
Cumulative Trauma Disorders, Iliotibial Band Syndrome
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT04164316
Cumulative Trauma Disorders, Iliotibial Band Syndrome
Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT05973708
Cumulative Trauma Disorders, Iliotibial Band Syndrome
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial Details