Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05490758

Sensorimotor Training and Constraint Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Function in Children With Hemiplegic CP

The aim of the work was to find out the effects of sensorimotor training and constraint induced movement therapy on upper extremity function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

8 year–15 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rising Sun Institute

Lahore, Punjab Province, 40050, Pakistan

About this study

The significance of this study is that there was paucity of literature in finding the comparative effects of sensorimotor training and constraint induced movement therapy on upper extremity function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The aim is to find out the effects of sensorimotor training on motor functioning of the upper extremity in comparison of constraint induced movement therapy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • subjects who were fully oriented
  • children diagnosed with hemiplegic cerebral palsy
  • no history of intramuscular botulinum injections past one year

Exclusion criteria

  • children with epilepsy
  • gross deformity of upper limb
  • children with contractures

Treatment and study plan

Sensorimotor Training

Other

sensorimotor training include activities like play with dough, peg games, puzzles for 5 days a week for 4 week.

Constraint induced movement therapy

Other

constraint induced movement therapy in which arm was constraint for 6 hours a day for 5 days a week for 4 week.

Primary outcomes

  1. nine hole peg test

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    nine hole peg test to check hand dexterity and grip. The patient is seated at a table with a container holding nine pegs and a wood/plastic block containing nine empty holes and asked to put the nine pegs in nine holes in a block one by one and then remove the pegs one at a time from the holes and the time is recorded. patient should do the test with both hands independently.

Secondary outcomes

  1. manual ability classification system

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    it describes how CP child uses his or her hands to handle objects in daily activities with qualitative analysis by care taker, it has five levels. in level 1 child holds objects easily and succesfully. in level 2 child handles most object but with some reduced quality or speed. in level 3 the objects are handled with difficulty and child needs help to prepare or modify activities. in level 4 child handles a limited selection of easily managed objects and always requires some help from others. in level 5 child is not able to handle objects or to complete even simple actions with their hands.

Other outcomes

  1. two point discrimination

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    two point discrimination to discern that the two nearby objects touching the skin are truly two distant points. it is tested with a sharp object caliper is applied to the exposed skin and response and time are recorded. it is used for tactile perception. the normal minimal distance for the hands is 3cm and 0.6 cm for the fingers tips.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Sensorimotor Training and Constraint Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Function in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 8, 2022
Registry last updated
Aug 8, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.