Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05355883

Remote Ischemic Conditioning, Bimanual Skill Learning, and Corticospinal Excitability

Unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) is a leading cause of childhood disability. An early brain injury impairs the upper extremity function, bimanual coordination, and impacts the child's independence. The existing therapeutic interventions have higher training doses and modest effect sizes. Thus, there is a critical need to find an effective priming agent to enhance bimanual skill learning in children with UCP. This study aims to determine the effects of a novel priming agent, remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), when paired with intensive bimanual skill training to enhance bimanual skill learning and to augment skill dependent plasticity in children with UCP.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

6 year–16 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dept. of Physical Therapy, East Carolina University

Greenville, North Carolina, 27834, United States

About this study

Ischemic conditioning (IC) is a phenomenon of protecting the target organ from ischemia by directly exposing it to brief episodes of sublethal ischemia. RIC is a clinically feasible way of performing IC where episodes of ischemia and reperfusion are delivered with cyclic inflation and deflation of a blood pressure cuff on the arm or leg. Pre-clinical and preliminary clinical trials in humans show neuroprotective effects of RIC. Investigators prior work has shown that when paired with motor training, RIC enhances motor learning in healthy individuals. Based on these diversified benefits of RIC, the central hypothesis is that the multifactorial mechanisms of RIC can be harnessed as a priming agent to enhance motor learning and augment neuroplasticity in children with UCP. The Specific Aims are: 1) to determine the effects of RIC + training on bimanual skill performance, and 2) to determine the effects of RIC + training on corticospinal excitability in children with UCP. In this triple blind, randomized controlled trial, 30 children with UCP, ages 6-16 years will first undergo bimanual speed stack performance, functional upper extremity, and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation assessments. Children will then undergo RIC/Sham conditioning plus training. Investigators will deliver RIC/sham conditioning via cyclic inflation and deflation of a pressure cuff on the paretic arm using a standard protocol. Training will involve 5 days (15 trials/day) of bimanual speed stack training and intensive bimanual training using hand arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) with a standard dose of 6 hours/day for 5 days. The children will perform the same baseline assessments post-intervention. Investigators hypothesize that compared to sham conditioning + training, RIC + training will significantly enhance: 1) bimanual skill performance (decrease in movement time (sec) to complete bimanual speed stack task), 2) bimanual function (increase in the Assisting Hand Assessment scores), 3) cortical excitability in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) (larger amplitude of motor evoked potentials and lower resting or active motor thresholds), and 4) reduce motor cortex inhibition (reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition and increase in intracortical facilitation in ipsilesional M1). The long-term goal is to develop effective interventions to improve function of children with UCP. Outcomes of this project will provide critical ingredients for designing Phase II trials that will determine the effects of RIC combined with different dose of intensive behavioral interventions to improve functional outcomes in children with UCP.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Children diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy, ages 6-16 years

  • Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I-III
  • Ability to complete a stack of 3 cups in 2 minutes
  • Mainstream in school and has sufficient cognition to follow the experiment instructions

Exclusion criteria

  • Children with other developmental disabilities such as autism, developmental coordination disorders, etc.
  • Children with absent active motor threshold
  • Children with cognitive deficits or communication problem
  • Children with known cardiorespiratory and vascular dysfunctions
  • Children with metabolic disorders, neoplasm, hydrocephalus
  • Children who are receiving other adjunct therapies such as rTMS and tDCS
  • Children with seizures and on anti-seizure medications
  • Children with metal implants and incompatible medical devices for MRI scans

Treatment and study plan

Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)

Behavioral

See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. RIC is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the pre-training assessment visit, visits 2-6 are RIC plus training visits, visit 7 is a post-training assessment visit.

Other names: Remote limb ischemic conditioning

Sham conditioning

Behavioral

See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. Sham conditioning is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the pre-training assessment visit, visits 2-6 are RIC plus training visits, visit 7 is a post-training assessment visit.

Other names: Sham

Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT)

Behavioral

HABIT is a child-friendly, intensive intervention directed at improving bimanual coordination and function of the affected arm. The intervention employed in this study includes various age-appropriate fine and gross motor bimanual activities that will be delivered in a play context. Children practice bimanual activities for 6 hours per day, 5 days per week, for 1 week.

Other names: Bimanual skill training

Bimanual Cup Stacking Training

Behavioral

Children practices bimanual cup stacking, 15 trials/day for 5 consecutive day.

Other names: Cup stacking task

Balance training

Behavioral

All children undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level with equal weight on each leg and using various bilateral upper extremity strategies. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 2-6.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Assisting Hand Assessment

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    Assisting Hand Assessment assesses bimanual coordination and affected hand function. A 5-point change from pre- to post-intervention is considered a clinically meaningful improvement.

  2. Change in Bimanual Task Performance

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    The time (seconds) to complete each trial of cup stack, which will be averaged across three trials. This will be measured at visit 1 (pre-) and visit 7 (post-intervention). Smaller time to complete the task indicates better performance.

  3. Change in Resting and Active Motor Thresholds

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    The minimum intensity of the stimulator output required to produce an MEP of > 50 μV will be determined using maximum-likelihood parameter estimation by a sequential testing (ML-PEST) algorithm from the lesioned and non-lesioned cortex. Greater reduction in resting and active motor threshold from pre- to post-intervention indicates greater corticospinal excitability.

  4. Change in Stimulus-response curves

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    Suprathreshold intensities of 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, and 150% of resting motor threshold will be administered randomly on the lesioned and non-lesioned cortex. Greater motor evoked potential response at each of these intensities indicate greater corticospinal excitability.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Box and Blocks Test (BBT)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    BBT is a standard test to assess manual speed. Greater number of blocks transferred indicates greater manual speed.

  2. Change in Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    NHPT is a standard test to assess manual speed and dexterity. Smaller time to complete NHPT indicates greater speed and dexterity.

  3. Change in Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    JHFT assesses fine and gross hand and arm movements. Smaller time to complete JHFT indicates better hand function.

  4. Change in Balance performance

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    The average amount of time in seconds that a participant maintains the stability platform within ±5° of horizontal position during 15 trials of 30 seconds each. The total score will range between 0-30 seconds. Higher balance score indicates better balance performance. Greater average balance time indicates better balance performance.

  5. Change in Hand grip and pinch strength

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    Hand grip and pinch strength assesses hand muscle strength. Greater hand and pinch strength indicates greater strength of hand muscles.

  6. Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    For SICI, a subthreshold (80% RMT) conditioning pulse to the motor hotspot will be applied followed by a suprathreshold (120% RMT) test pulse 3 milliseconds later. Reduction in SICI indicates intracortical facilitation.

  7. Change in Intracortical Facilitation (ICF)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    For ICF, the interstimulus interval will increase to 12 milliseconds. Greater ICF indicates greater intracortical facilitation.

  8. Change in accelerometry derived variables

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

    Number of movements, use ratio, magnitude ratio, bilateral magnitude, and acceleration variability will be quantified using wrist worn accelerometers. Greater values indicate better bimanual performance.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

East Carolina University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Bimanual Skill Learning, Bimanual Coordination, and Corticospinal Excitability in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 2, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 16, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.