University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Cynthia Dougherty, ARNP, PhD
CONTACT
Cynthia Dougherty, ARNP, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06037785
This study, "Biobehavioral Intervention to Reduce PTSD Symptoms After an ICD Shock," addresses a critical need in cardiology care by describing the feasibility and acceptability of a timely, highly promising, electronically-delivered intervention for patients who have recently received an ICD delivered shock. The study intervention and outcomes are designed to reduce anxiety, enhance return to activities of daily living (ADLs), and prevent the development of severe distress and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and ultimately promote quality of life. The study is a two-arm, embedded mixed methods, randomized trial (N=60, 30/group). The purpose is to determine feasibility and potential effects of a self-management intervention (SPSM) plus usual care (UC) compared to UC alone, delivered during the critical 1 month period after an ICD shock when distress is high. The intervention will be delivered over 1 month following an ICD shock; a 6-month follow-up will be used to assess the sustainability of intervention effects and determine if the incidence of PTSD is reduced. SPSM includes: 1) training in heart rate (HR) self-monitoring; and 2) individualized learning through 4 self-paced, web-based modules. The study interventions are delivered at a crucial time, closely after an ICD shock when stress is high, but PTSD has not yet developed. The specific aims are to: 1) examine the effects of the SPSM intervention plus UC vs. UC alone on the primary outcome of ICD shock anxiety at 1 and 6 months post-shock event, 2) describe the impact of SPSM plus UC compared to UC alone on the secondary outcomes of total daily physical activity, depression, PTSD symptoms, QOL, salivary cortisol levels, and self-efficacy and outcome expectations at 1 and 6 months post-shock event, and 3) assess feasibility, acceptability, and safety of the SPSM intervention, SDOH will be used to describe differential responses to the SPSM intervention. This study fills a significant gap in the care of patients with an ICD, through the systematic testing of a brief, novel and cost-effective intervention that provides the knowledge and skills to improve quality of life. Study findings will be used to design future larger RCTs to test intervention effectiveness for more diverse samples and settings.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Cynthia Dougherty, ARNP, PhD
CONTACT
Cynthia Dougherty, ARNP, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
(SPSM) consists of two components: 1) HR Self-monitoring, and 2) online Shock Management modules (N=4) with weekly telephone coaching, completed over 1 month.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6 months
Florida Shock Anxiety Scale: range 1-50, higher is higher anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6 months
Step Watch Activity Monitor, 0-unlimited number of steps. Higher is more steps.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6 months
PHQ-9, 0-27. Higher is higher depression.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6 months
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist PCL-5, 0-80. Higher is higher PTSD symtpoms
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6 months
PROMIS Global v 2.0, 0-50. Higher is higher qol.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6 months
Self-Efficacy Expectations-SE scale, 0-60, Higher is more self-efficacy
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6 months
OE Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 6 months
Cortisol in saliva, the range in humans varies. measured in pg/ml.
Time frame: 6 months
Acceptability of interventions and materials measured in terms of patient burden (time to complete questionnaires & data collection, ease in understanding, implementing the intervention). These are qualitative open ended answers to questions and do not produce a number.
Time frame: 6 months
Feasibility will be measured using patient recruitment and contact rates (reach within 1-3 days of shock, number screened, eligible & enrolled, proportion eligible vs agree to participate). Each of these variables creates a number for the total study. They elements are added together to get a score.
Time frame: 2 years of the trial
Safety: major adverse cardiac events, including mortality (all cause and cardiac). This is measured as yes or no. Each outcome is score and the total number is summarized.
Time frame: 6 months
Acceptability of interventions and materials measured in terms of patient burden (time to complete questionnaires & data collection, ease in understanding, implementing the intervention). These are qualitative open ended answers to questions and do not produce a number.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Washington
Other
Biobehavioral Intervention to Reduce PTSD After ICD Shock
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03544489
Behavior, Cardiovascular Diseases
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06937658
Implantable Defibrillator User, Pacemaker Ddd
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06388382
Implantable Defibrillator User
Cologne, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05835791
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Conduction System Disease
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial Details