University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Cynthia Dougherty, ARNP, PhD
CONTACT
Cynthia Dougherty, ARNP, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT03544489
This study will test an exercise intervention (E-ICD) following an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Cynthia Dougherty, ARNP, PhD
CONTACT
Cynthia Dougherty, ARNP, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The goal of this study is to test the effectiveness and describe implementation of a home based exercise intervention for persons with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). This study is based on the NIH stage model of behavioral interventions (stage III effectiveness) that aligns with the strategic mission of the NHLBI, to optimize clinical and implementation research to improve health and reduce disease (Obj #6). The study intervention is based on the protocol and monitoring components that were developed in prior RCTs and a pilot study conducted by our team. From these studies, we created a home based exercise program called Exercise-ICD (E-ICD) for testing in a broader range of ICD patients, that assists individuals to start and monitor exercise safely after an ICD. An randomized two group (E-ICD vs. usual care) pragmatic effectiveness mixed-methods study is proposed, to determine the effectiveness of the E-ICD intervention and describe implementation by cardiac rehabilitation (CR) clinical staff. Two hundred ten (N=210) patients in 3 local study sites (70/site) in the greater Seattle, WA area will participate. E-ICD is guided by the Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) model. The E-ICD intervention consists of 12 weeks of home walking exercise using exercise prescriptions and protocols validated in our previous work. The primary effectiveness outcome is patient physical activity (steps/day) after the E-ICD intervention at 3 months. We will determine the number of patients who reach the public health walking goal of moderate level exercise of 150 minutes/week at the end of the study. Measures will be taken at baseline, after the intervention at 3 months, and at 6 and 12 months to determine maintenance. The specific aims are to: 1) Test the hypothesis that participants randomized to E-ICD vs. usual care (UC) will demonstrate increased physical activity (minutes walked/week) [primary outcome], health related quality of life, gait speed, mobility, exercise self-efficacy; and reduced ICD shock anxiety and depression at 3 months (E-ICD Effectiveness), 2) Assess longer term effects of E-ICD on participant and health care system Maintenance, captured by 1) participant retention, satisfaction, and adherence at 12 months (total minutes/week), and 2) clinician and institutional intent to sustain use of the E-ICD intervention after the study, and 3) Evaluate the reach, adoption, and implementation of E-ICD by CR clinical staff. Reach will be assessed by the diverse patient participation rate, representativeness, and reasons for non-interest. Adoption is the participation rate and representativeness of the settings and staff who participate, and factors related to adoption. Implementation will be assessed by delivery fidelity of E-ICD and workflow adaptations, implementation costs, and consistency of delivery across settings.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Home walking 3 days/week x 12 weeks
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
average steps/day measured on Step Watch activity monitor
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
PROMIS Global v1.2 measures 5 domains of global health and quality of life, including physical, mental, and social health. Two factors physical health (GPH) and mental health (GMH) are derived.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
PROMIS Mobility V2.1 measures general mobility of lower extremities in adults, relating to overall physical functioning
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (9-items, α=0.92) assesses self-efficacy expectations related to one's ability to walk in the face of barriers to exercise [22], was used in the pilot and found to be sensitive to change with the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS), assesses anxiety about receiving an ICD shock [23], is sensitive to change across time.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (9 items, α=0.83), measures depressive symptoms, as well as suicidality.
Time frame: 12 months
Measure of innovation-specific implementation intentions (MISII) scale (3 items) completed by CR staffs and site staff, measures the providers' intentions to use the E-ICD program in routine care.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Washington
Other
Clinical Effectiveness of Exercise After an ICD (E-ICD)
Acronym: E-ICD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06809309
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiovascular Diseases
Aabenraa, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05321459
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bobigny, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05173740
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiac Rehabilitation
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06401707
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Arrest
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details