Walk in New York (WINY) Physical Therapy, P.C.
New York, 10010, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Joshua Breighner, PT DPT
CONTACT
Joshua Breighner, PT DPT
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07222033
This study aims to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the personal exoskeleton in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
New York, 10010, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Joshua Breighner, PT DPT
CONTACT
Joshua Breighner, PT DPT
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
This personal exoskeleton, developed by Wandercraft as a new version of the Atalante X, offers a novel hands-free and self-balancing design, aiming at enhancing stability and mobility for users in daily activities.
The study features an interventional, prospective, single-group, and open-label design, conducted over 3 to 4 weeks in a US investigation site. It aims to enroll up to 12 SCI users and their 12 companions, resulting in 12 SCI user-companion pairs.
Over the course of nine to ten scheduled visits, participants undergo a sequence of procedures, beginning with screening and device fitting. This is followed by five training sessions which conclude with an evaluation to issue a competency certificate to confirm the ability to use the device across all its "basic skills". Additionally, two sessions are dedicated to evaluating the exoskeleton's effectiveness outcomes, complemented by an extra practice session. Each visit lasts an average of 1.5 hours.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
SCI user inclusion Criteria:
SCI user exclusion Criteria:
Companion inclusion Criteria:
Companion exclusion Criteria:
A "device trainer specialist" from the investigation site will deliver training sessions with the exoskeleton to pair of participants (a pair corresponds to an individual with SCI and his/her companion). The device trainer will follow the progression of the pair through the training program and ensure they learn all the device "basic skills". Each training session lasts an average of 1.5 hours, variations according to the user's learning pace and tolerance. During the sessions with the exoskeleton, the participants will engage in mobility activities on different surfaces and perform Activities of Daily Living in simulated environments such as kitchen, bathroom, elevators and outdoor spaces.
Time frame: Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
Collection and analysis of adverse events to evaluate the safety of the device for its intended use and user population, specifically for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) performing ambulatory activities hands-free, accompanied by a companion.
Time frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
The TUG evaluates the time from starting in a seated position to stand-up, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back 3 meters and sit down on indoor surface.
Time frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
The 6MWT measures the distance in meters traversed over 6 min, on indoor surface.
Time frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
The ADLs are done standing in front of the countertop in the kitchen, in a simulated living room, taking a 50m walk in the outdoor environment, taking the elevator, in the bathroom and walking in a hallway and through a door to get to the next room.
Time frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
The 10MWT measures the time in seconds taken to walk 10 meters.
Time frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
Time frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 7.5 hours of training.
During the Certification Evaluation, the users' performance in executing all the device usability critical tasks will be observed and assessed by the trainer to ensure they are performed correctly (i.e., executed safely, regardless of the level of companion assistance, that is documented but isn't a criterion for success). The "basic skills" certification evaluation is passed if all the device basic skills have been learnt through the previous training sessions with the device (visits 2-5) and the critical tasks are re-executed correctly during the evaluation at visit 6. The device basic skills cover device theoretical knowledge, proper setup and installation in the device, walking and other ambulatory functions on different surfaces, Activities of Daily Living in indoor and outdoor environment techniques on various surfaces, and safety features such as emergency extraction.
Time frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 7.5 hours of training.
For each basic skill, the visit number at which users are confirmed to have safely mastered the task is recorded on a "checklist", which lists all the device basic skills and is provided to the trainer. The goal is to track the users' learning progress and mastery of the device over time.
Time frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
Assistance provided by the companion when mastering each basic skill on the checklist at initial learning, at the certification evaluation, during the additional practice session and when performing each test. A 3-point scale based on the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, tailored to the device and its progression stage will be used: 1-Maximal assistance: The companion provides support with both hands touching the device and/or the user almost continuously. 2- Moderate assistance - The companion provides support with one or both hands touching the device and/or the user intermittently. 3- Close contact guard/no assistance - The companion does not touch the device and/or the user but is close enough to assist if needed.
Time frame: After an average of 7.5 hours of training, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and 1.5 hours of assessment and after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
The Borg scale rates the perceived exertion between 6 and 20 (very very light to very very hard exertion). The SCI users and their companions are asked to give their rating for the entire session, separately.
Time frame: After an average of 7.5 hours of training, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and 1.5 hours of assessment and after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
Each participant - SCI user and companion separately - will be asked to provide his/her level of agreement on the following statement: "I felt safe during the session." by using a 7-level agreement scale from 1: "Strongly disagree" to 7: "Totally agree".
Time frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
This measure is taken by the device itself.
Time frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
The measure is taken by the device itself.
Time frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
The measure is taken by the device itself.
Time frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
This data is collected by the device trainers at each session. Users are considered to have walked on a surface during a session if they have covered a minimum distance of 10 meters on that surface.
Time frame: After an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
Perceived health benefits and overall satisfaction and motivation of the SCI users, assessed by a modified version of the Gagnon questionnaire. The statements under evaluation will be taken from the 41 statements originally found in the Gagnon questionnaire that encompass seven domains : - overall program satisfaction, - satisfaction with the robotic exoskeleton, - learnability of the robotic exoskeleton, - satisfaction with the program attributes, - perceived health benefits of walking with the robotic exoskeleton, - perceived risks and fears of walking with the robotic exoskeleton and - perceived motivation to engage in regular physical activity.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Wandercraft
Industry
Empowering Mobility in People With Spinal Cord Injury With a Hands-free, Self-balancing Personal Exoskeleton
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07625332
Central Nervous System Diseases, Glucose Metabolism Disorders
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06836739
Central Nervous System Diseases, Colonic Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07251491
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06295146
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details