At-Home Genital Nerve Stimulation for SCI Bowel

The 1st feasibility measure bench mark will be the proportion of enrolled who complete the full stimulation protocol.

The 2nd feasibility measure bench mark will be the number of occurrences of unblinding.

The 3rd feasibility measure bench mark will be the retention rate.

The main secondary endpoint will be anorectal reflex activity as measured by ARM. ARM is the gold standard clinical tool for investigating anorectal function. It is widely available and very well established. Recent efforts have been made to standardize ARM testing protocols so that results can be categorized. The London Classification protocol will be used in ARM testing in this experiment.

This is conducted by a clinician and involves a gastrointestinal system clinical exam of bowel dysfunction.

A bowel diary is a means for participants to record daily bowel activities. It will be time-stamped. Parameters that are targeted to be recorded include stool type (using the Bristol Stool Scale), amount, planned emptying episodes (including time), incontinence episodes, sense of urgency, straining, medications, and complications such as nausea or hemorrhoids. These data will characterize each participant's bowel management routine, daily habits, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms.

A record of hours of daily stimulation use will also be captured in a stimulation diary.

The ISCI BF BDS v2.1 incorporates the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score as well as information about GI or anal sphincter dysfunction unrelated to SCI, surgical procedures on the GI tract, defecation methods and bowel care procedures, the need to wear external continence products, and presence of abdominal pain or discomfort. The NBDS was developed specifically for SCI and measures the degree of neurogenic bowel dysfunction symptomology and the impact on quality of life (QoL). There are 10 items, and they are symptom-based and weighted by the impact on QoL. The score ranges from 0-45 with a higher score meaning a worse outcome.

The SCI-QoL BMD measures difficulties people living with SCI have with bowel management, including feelings of distress associated with bowel problems they experience in daily life. The items focus on issues related to fecal incontinence and the psychosocial consequences of fecal incontinence, which is different that the ISCI BF BDS v2.1 and why it was selected as an additional secondary outcome measure. The full scale is composed of 26 items, but a computer assisted technology version and 9-item short form version have also been created. The short form version will be used in this trial and is available for download from Assessment Center. Each item has a response option based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 'never/not at all' to 5 always/very much'. Raw scores range from 9-45 with higher scores representing greater difficulty managing bowel problems.

SCI CDEs to be collected include 1) Medical History for body system categories including start date, end date, and ongoing status, 2) History of Injury (injury time frame, injury etiology), 3) Demographics (gender, birth date, race, ethnicity, marital status, number of members in household, area of residence, number of years of education, primary occupation), and 4) International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI for injury classification (upper extremity motor score, lower extremity motor score, total motor score, light touch sensory score, pinprick sensory score, deep anal pressure, voluntary anal contraction, zone of partial preservation, and impairment grade data)

It is important to be able to collect participant feedback on the ease or difficulty of using the TENS unit and applying GNS at home. This is important feasibility information that should be collected, and we will generate a form to enable more standardized collection of this data from each participant. This will include prompts such as any difficulty placing electrodes, any difficulty keeping electrodes in place, any need for further training on the device once home, any device malfunctions, any need for replacement components or electrodes, etc.

A study exit questionnaire will be used to determine whether participants remained blinded throughout the study and any perspectives on their experience while in the study.