Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07620912

Sedation vs No Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated COPD Patients

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of no-sedation compared to daily interruption of sedation (DIS) in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Mechanical ventilation is associated with discomfort, anxiety, and agitation, often requiring sedation. However, excessive sedation may worsen outcomes, especially in COPD patients with respiratory failure. This randomized controlled trial will include 100 adult COPD patients admitted to the respiratory ICU and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups: one managed with daily interruption of sedation and the other managed with a no-sedation protocol. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days, while secondary outcomes include ICU length of stay, complications, difficulty of weaning, and nursing workload.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Mechanical ventilation is a stressful experience for critically ill patients, often associated with pain, discomfort, and anxiety due to invasive procedures, environmental factors, and underlying disease. Sedation is commonly used in intensive care units to improve patient comfort and tolerance to mechanical ventilation. However, excessive sedation has been associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer ICU stay, and increased complications.

Daily interruption of sedation (DIS) has been introduced to reduce sedation-related complications and improve outcomes. Recent trends support minimizing sedation and promoting patient comfort using alternative approaches. However, the optimal sedation strategy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unclear, especially in those with hypercapnic respiratory failure, where sedative drugs may worsen respiratory depression.

This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted in the respiratory intensive care unit at Al-Azhar University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt 100 adult patients with COPD exacerbation requiring invasive mechanical ventilation will be enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups:

Group A (control group): Patients will receive sedation using midazolam infusion with daily interruption guided by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).

Group B (intervention group): Patients will be managed with a no-sedation protocol. Sedation will only be administered if clinically indicated due to agitation or discomfort.

All patients will receive standard medical treatment for COPD and will be monitored clinically and by laboratory and radiological investigations. Weaning from mechanical ventilation will be performed according to standard criteria.

The primary outcome is ventilator-free days. Secondary outcomes include ICU length of stay, incidence of complications, difficulty of weaning, and nursing workload.

Ethical approval has been obtained, and informed consent will be secured from patients or their legal representatives before enrollment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients (≥18 years old). Patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.

Previously diagnosed COPD confirmed by post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 70%. Patients admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (ICU).

Exclusion criteria

Known allergy to midazolam. Renal impairment. Hepatic impairment. Active malignancy (cancer). Psychiatric disorders. Neurological disorders. Pregnancy.

-

Treatment and study plan

Midalozam

Drug

Midazolam will be given as needed in bolus doses if agitation occurs.

Primary outcomes

  1. Ventilator-free days during the first 28 days after initiation of mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: 28 days after enrollment

    Number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation within 28 days after enrollment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of complications during ICU stay

    Time frame: During ICU stay, assessed daily up to 28 days

    Occurrence of complications including ventilator-associated pneumonia, hemodynamic instability, or need for reintubation during ICU stay.

  2. Length of ICU stay

    Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, up to 28 days

    Duration of stay in the intensive care unit measured in days from ICU admission until discharge.

  3. Difficulty of weaning from mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: From initiation of weaning until successful liberation from mechanical ventilation or ICU discharge (up to 28 days)

    Assessment of weaning difficulty based on duration of weaning process, number of spontaneous breathing trial failures, and need for prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Al-Azhar University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Compareson Between Sedation and No Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients

Acronym: SEDvsNO-COPD

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 2, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.