Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00430404

Screening and Treatment of Depression in the Community

To evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based strategy of routine population mass screening for depression with follow-up feedback and management in a primary care non-psychiatric setting involving a structured, multifaceted, collaborative (primary care and hospital-based)shared care programme.

Hypotheses:

We hypothesize that a community-based early psychiatric interventional strategy (CEPIS) for depression in the elderly leads to increased recognition of depression by primary care physicians, more initiation of treatment for emotional problems, and improved outcomes for patients with depression, as measured by:

1. increased rates of detection or recognition by a primary care physician of minor or major (clinical) depression. 2. higher rates of management activities: counselling for psychological, family social problems, contact with community family services (human service agency), consultation and/or referral to a mental health specialist 3. Reduced depressive symptom severity, improved level of daily functioning and quality of life among those with major clinical depression 4. Better patient satisfaction with care 5. Favourable clinician's and patients perception of their usefulness or acceptability

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road

Singapore, 119074

About this study

Depression is a highly prevalent, clinically under-recognized and under-treated medical disorder world wide. In Singapore, 17% of the adult population experience recent psychiatric disturbances, yet only 6% use the services of any health professional. General practitioners are the most commonly preferred caregiver, and actually used by 41.1% of those who sought help. At the same time, suicide rates especially among the elderly remain at very high levels compared to other countries in the world.

In recent decades, screening questionnaires have been developed and validated that are suitable for the initial detection of depression in the primary care setting. Previous research have shown that screening for depression do not result in increased recognition rates of mental disorders unless positive cases are selectively fed back to primary care physicians. They also do not translate into increased rates of interventional activities such as initiation of therapy and referral to mental health specialists. Neither dose primary care physician education or clinical practice guidelines result in any improved outcomes for the patients unless these are accompanied by more sophisticated strategies in the organization and delivery of care, such as structured, collaborative, multidisciplinary care together with quality improvement processes.

More empirical data are therefore needed to establish whether screening for psychiatric disorders will enhance the recognition of clinical disorder, leading to better patient outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • > 60 years without dementia,
  • Major depressive disorder,
  • Bipolar disorder,
  • Dysthymia disorder,
  • Anxiety disorder,
  • Mania/hypomania

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe post-stroke dementia or aphasia,
  • History of mania, psychiatric consultation or admission to hospital in past 3 months,
  • MMSE score <18,
  • Fully dependent at 3 or more basic activities of daily living,
  • Very high BDI score (>=30),
  • Serious suicidal risk,
  • Current psychotic symptoms,
  • Current alcohol abuse,
  • Very high GDS score (>=12) confirmed by SCID

Treatment and study plan

Collaborative care (Intervention)

Other

Structured shared care with treatment protocol & support

Other names: Community based early psychiatric intervention strategy

Primary outcomes

  1. Response to treatment at 6 months follow up is defined as a 50% reduction in HAMD-17 score

    Time frame: 6 months

    After enrolled in the study for 6 months, depressive symptoms were expected to reduce to 50% in assessment fo HAM_D 17

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rates of physician and patient self-report of service utilization at 6 month follow up

    Time frame: 6 months

    Report of primary care physicians and patient's self report of using of health service for the treatment of depression

  2. Improvement in follow-up SF-12 scores from baseline

    Time frame: 12 months

    Study participants' physical component and mental component of Quality of life were assessed after 12 months.

  3. Caregiver burden at 6 month follow-up

    Time frame: 6 months

    Caregiver burden on taking care of depressive patients was assessed after 6months of study.

  4. Patient satisfaction with care at 6 month follow up

    Time frame: 6 months

    Participants under intervention care (collaborative care) were surveyed about their satisfaction with the program after 6 months of enrollment in the study.

  5. Physician feedback at 6 month follow up

    Time frame: 6 months

    primary physicians in the both arms were surveyed for their satisfaction about the study programme after the 6 months of study.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National University Hospital, Singapore

Other

Collaborators

  • National University of Singapore

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community-based Early Psychiatric Intervention Strategy to Screen and Manage Depression in the Elderly

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2007
First posted
Feb 1, 2007
Registry last updated
Jan 3, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.