Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07389421

School Meals in Denmark

This study looks at how a national school meal program affects the health, well-being, and learning of Danish schoolchildren aged 10 to 15 years.

The study is part of the Danish National School Meal Pilot Program (2025-2028), which provides free school meals at selected public schools. Some school classes receive free school meals, while other classes do not and are used for comparison.

Children are followed for about 1.5 years. Information is collected before and after the program using simple health measurements, questionnaires about well-being, and age-appropriate cognitive tests.

The study also uses information from Danish national registers to better understand the children's background and to study longer-term outcomes related to health, education, and social conditions. In addition, the study examines whether school meal programs are cost-effective by comparing their costs with potential benefits for children and society.

The goal of the study is to find out whether free school meals can improve children's health, well-being, and learning, and help reduce social differences.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

School Meals in Denmark is a prospective, open-label, matched-pair cluster-randomized controlled study conducted as a natural experiment alongside the Danish National School Meal Pilot Program. As allocation to the national program is determined by the Danish Ministry of Children and Education and not by the investigators, the study evaluates the effects of school meals under real-world conditions without introducing an additional experimental intervention.

Approximately 3,200 children in grades 3, 4, and 7 from 32 public schools are included. Participating schools are matched in pairs based on socioeconomic and geographic characteristics using national statistical data. Recruitment includes schools implementing the program either at the middle grades or at the lower secondary level. At each school, intervention classes are identified at the grade level receiving school meals.

Control classes are recruited pragmatically from the same schools but at a different grade level than the intervention classes. Intervention effects are estimated by comparing classes at the same grade level across matched schools, where one school implements the school meal program at that grade and the matched school does not. This approach allows for within-school control recruitment while preserving between-school comparisons at the same grade level.

Data are collected at two time points over a follow-up period of approximately 1.5 years using a pre-post design. Outcomes include anthropometric measures (height, weight, body composition assessed by bioelectrical impedance), cardiovascular indicators (blood pressure and resting heart rate), tablet-based cognitive performance tests, and child-reported questionnaires on well-being and psychosocial functioning. Parents complete brief electronic questionnaires addressing their child's psychosocial functioning and dietary habits.

In addition, observations of school meal settings are conducted to assess food intake and food waste, and menu plans from meal providers are collected to evaluate nutritional quality and compliance with dietary guidelines.

The study is designed to generate robust evidence on the real-world effects of school meal programs on children's health, well-being, and learning outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All children attending 3rd, 4th or 7th grade in the recruited schools

Exclusion criteria

  • No exclusion criteria will be applied

Treatment and study plan

School meal classes

Behavioral

Natural experiment embedded within the Danish National School Meal Pilot Program (2025-2028), which offers free school meals to selected public schools.

Children receive a free school-provided meal (typically lunch) five days per week. Meals vary across schools, as each school selects its own meal provider.

All meals must comply with the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations and the Danish Food-Based Dietary Guidelines, with a focus on fish, whole grains, fruits and vegetables, access to drinking water, and the promotion of children's food literacy.

Primary outcomes

  1. Well-being/health related quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the total summary score of health-related quality of life measured with the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer. The questionnaire assesses the child's physical well-being (5 items), psychological well-being (7 items), peers and social support (4 items), and school environment (4 items). Autonomy and parent relation (7 items) are not used.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Psychological functioning

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the total difficulties score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Assessed using child reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. An overall total difficulties score is calculated, along with five subscale scores: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/Inattention, relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.

  2. Internalizing problems

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the internalizing problem score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire, calculated as the sum of the emotional symptoms and peer problems scales scores. Assessed using the child-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

  3. Externalizing problems

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the externalizing behavior score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire, calculated as the sum of conduct problems, hyperactivity/Inattention subscales scores. Assessed using the child-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

  4. Prosocial Behavior

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the prosocial behavior score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Assessed using the child-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

  5. Psychological functioning (2)

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the total difficulties score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Assessed using parent reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. An overall total difficulties score is calculated, along with five subscale scores: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/Inattention, relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.

  6. Externalizing problems (2)

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the externalizing behavior score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire, calculated as the sum of conduct problems, hyperactivity/Inattention subscales scores. Assessed using the parent-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

  7. Internalizing problems (2)

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the internalizing problem score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire, calculated as the sum of the emotional symptoms and peer problems scales scores. Assessed using the parent-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

  8. Prosocial Behavior (2)

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the prosocial behavior score of the Strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Assessed using the parent-reported version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

  9. WHO-5 Well-Being Index

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the 5-question self-report tool from the World Health Organization measuring subjective mental well-being over the past two weeks, assessing feelings like cheerfulness, calmness, and interest.

  10. School environment

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the school environment (4 items) score of the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer.

  11. Peers and social support

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the peers and social support (4 items) score of the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer.

  12. Psychological well-being

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the psychological well-being (7 items) score of the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer.

  13. Physical well-being

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in the physical well-being (5 items) score of the KIDSCREEN 27 child self-report questionnaire. Data is collected using an adapted video and speech assisted electronic version with a smiley scale for each answer.

  14. Resting blood pressure in mmHg

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

  15. Resting heart rate beats/min

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in heart rate.

  16. Fat mass in kg

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in fat mass measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).

  17. Fat free mass in kg

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in fat free mass measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).

  18. Fat mass index in kg/m2

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in fat mass index measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).

  19. Fat free mass index in kg/m2

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in fat free mass index measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).

  20. Fat-Free-Mass-to-Fat-Mass ratio

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in FFM-to-FM ratio measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).

  21. % Fat Mass

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in % FM in kg measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270).

  22. Weight status in %

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in prevalence of children with underweight, normalweight, overweight and obesity, based on the cutoffs defined by Cole et al. and the International Task Force of Obesity. Body weight is measured by a bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270) and height by using a portable stadiometer.

  23. BMI z-score

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Between group difference in change in BMI z-score based on WHO references. Weight and height is measured using weight from the bioimpedance analysis (InBody 270) and a portable stadiometer, respectively.

  24. Sustained attention

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Performance in neuropsychological assessment of sustained attention ability assessed as errors during a sustained test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).

  25. Spatial working memory

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Performance in neuropsychological assessment of spatial working memory assessed as errors and strategy during the test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).

  26. Inhibitory control

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Performance in neuropsychological assessment of inhibitory control assessed as errors during the test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).

  27. Cognitive flexibility

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Performance in neuropsychological assessment of cognitive flexibility assessed as errors during the test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).

  28. Fine motor control

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Performance in neuropsychological assessment of fine motor control assessed as endpoint accuracy during the test procedure (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).

  29. Processing speed

    Time frame: Baseline, 16-22 months

    Performance in neuropsychological assessment of processing speed as choice reaction time (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, Cambridge cognition, UK).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Nikolai N Nordsborg, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4528751612

Paulina S Melby, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4527266039

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Copenhagen

Other

Collaborators

  • The Novo Nordic Foundation
  • University of Southern Denmark

Registry information

Official study title

School Meals in Denmark: Evaluation of a National School Meal Pilot Program on Children's Health, Learning and Well-being - a Natural Experiment

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2029
First posted
Feb 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.