Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04407611

Scalable Communication Modalities for Returning Genetic Research Results

Efforts to examine the utility of alternate modalities for genetic results disclosure has widespread implications for how precision medicine research might yield direct health benefits for study participants. This study will examine the efficacy of an online self-guided program to return genetic results to a racial minority cohort population. Study results will provide empirical evidence on the effectiveness of alternate modalities for genetic results return, inform ongoing efforts to establish scalable approaches for effective return of genetic research results, and increase access to personal health information among African American women.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) within the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) to test alternate communication modalities for results disclosure. The BWHS is an ongoing prospective cohort study of 59,000 self-identified black women from across the United States who have been followed since 1995. Targeted sequencing of over 4000 women within the cohort for BRCA1/2 and other known or suspected high and moderate penetrance genes opens up the possibility of returning breast cancer genetic results to BWHS participants and examining the clinical utility of genetic results return. The primary aim of the proposed research project is to compare the efficacy of two communication modalities for returning breast cancer genetic research results to African American women: 1) a conventional modality that entails telephone disclosure by a licensed genetic counselor, and 2) an online self-guided modality that entails returning results directly to participants, with optional genetic counselor follow-up via telephone. Secondary aims of this study will examine 1) moderators of the intervention impact and 2) psychosocial, sociodemographic, and clinical predictors of result uptake. This study is uniquely situated to provide critical empirical evidence on the effectiveness of alternate models for genetic results return and provide further insight into the factors influencing uptake of genetic information among African American women.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

-Women in the BWHS previously included in the targeted breast cancer sequencing project

Exclusion criteria

  • Women with known cognitive impairments
  • Women with variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results from the sequencing study

Treatment and study plan

Online modality

Behavioral

Return of BRCA results directly online or return of printed BRCA results if participant cannot access online or chooses not to

Other names: Web modality

Genetic counselor follow-up

Behavioral

Optional genetic counselor follow-up over the telephone

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participant that decide to learn genetic results at 6 weeks

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Decisions about learning genetic results for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer will be monitored and recorded in the electronic study database system.

  2. Number of participant that decide to learn genetic results at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Decisions about learning genetic results for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer will be monitored and recorded in the electronic study database system.

  3. Change from baseline in breast cancer genetics knowledge based on questionnaire at responses at 6 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

    Knowledge about breast cancer genetics will be assessed using an investigator derived questionnaire consisting of 16 items. Higher scores out of ten are associated with more genetics knowledge.

  4. Change in baseline depression at 6 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

    Depression will be assessed using the the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). The 2 questions are: Over the past 2 weeks have you been bothered by: (1) Little interest or pleasure in doing things, and (2) Feeling down, depressed or hopeless. Responses range from 0 to 3 where 0=Not at all, to 3=Nearly everyday. Scores are added and can range from 0 to 6, with higher scores reflecting greater depression.

  5. Depression at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Depression will be assessed using the the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). The 2 questions are: Over the past 2 weeks have you been bothered by: (1) Little interest or pleasure in doing things, and (2) Feeling down, depressed or hopeless. Responses range from 0 to 3 where 0=Not at all, to 3=Nearly everyday. Scores are added and can range from 0 to 6, with higher scores reflecting greater depression.

  6. Depression at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Depression will be assessed using the the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). The 2 questions are: Over the past 2 weeks have you been bothered by: (1) Little interest or pleasure in doing things, and (2) Feeling down, depressed or hopeless. Responses range from 0 to 3 where 0=Not at all, to 3=Nearly everyday. Scores are added and can range from 0 to 6, with higher scores reflecting greater depression.

  7. Change in baseline anxiety at 6 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

    Anxiety will be assessed using the the 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-2). The 2 questions are: Over the past 2 weeks how often have you been bothered by the following problems: (1) Feeling nervous, anxious or on edge, and (2) Not being able to stop or control worrying. Responses range from 0 to 3 where 0=Not at all, to 3=Nearly everyday. Scores are added and can range from 0 to 6, with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety.

  8. Anxiety at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Anxiety will be assessed using the the 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-2). The 2 questions are: Over the past 2 weeks how often have you been bothered by the following problems: (1) Feeling nervous, anxious or on edge, and (2) Not being able to stop or control worrying. Responses range from 0 to 3 where 0=Not at all, to 3=Nearly everyday. Scores are added and can range from 0 to 6, with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety.

  9. Anxiety at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Anxiety will be assessed using the the 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-2). The 2 questions are: Over the past 2 weeks how often have you been bothered by the following problems: (1) Feeling nervous, anxious or on edge, and (2) Not being able to stop or control worrying. Responses range from 0 to 3 where 0=Not at all, to 3=Nearly everyday. Scores are added and can range from 0 to 6, with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety.

  10. Participant distress from cancer risk assessment (test-specific distress) at 6 weeks

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Using the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) distress subscale, the investigators will assess perceptions of distress resulting from learning genetic test results. The distress subscale has 6 items, each scored on a 4 point scale, with higher scores reflecting greater distress.

  11. Participant distress from cancer risk assessment (test-specific distress) at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Using the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) distress subscale, the investigators will assess perceptions of distress resulting from learning genetic test results. The distress subscale has 6 items, each scored on a 4 point scale, with higher scores reflecting greater distress.

  12. Participant distress from cancer risk assessment (test-specific distress) at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Using the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) distress subscale, the investigators will assess perceptions of distress resulting from learning genetic test results. The distress subscale has 6 items, each scored on a 4 point scale, with higher scores reflecting greater distress.

  13. Participant uncertainty from cancer risk assessment at 6 weeks

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Using the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) uncertainty subscale, the investigators will assess perceptions of uncertainty resulting from learning genetic test results. Then uncertainty subscale has 9 items, each scored on a 4 point scale, with higher scores reflecting greater uncertainty.

  14. Participant uncertainty from cancer risk assessment at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Using the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) uncertainty subscale, the investigators will assess perceptions of uncertainty resulting from learning genetic test results. Then uncertainty subscale has 9 items, each scored on a 4 point scale, with higher scores reflecting greater uncertainty.

  15. Participant uncertainty from cancer risk assessment at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Using the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) uncertainty subscale, the investigators will assess perceptions of uncertainty resulting from learning genetic test results. Then uncertainty subscale has 9 items, each scored on a 4 point scale, with higher scores reflecting greater uncertainty.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Boston University

Other

Collaborators

  • MGH Institute of Health Professions
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
  • University of Washington

Registry information

Official study title

Testing Scalable Communication Modalities for Returning Breast Cancer Genetic Research Results to African American Women

Acronym: BWHS RoR

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
May 29, 2020
Registry last updated
Apr 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.