Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01903499

Satiety Effects of Beef Compared to Beans

The satiety effects of beef will be compared to beans. Beef is hypothesized to be more satiating than beans.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Food Selection Behavior Feeding Behavior Food Preferences

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Food Science and Nutrition

Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, United States

About this study

Subjects will consume 2 different meatloaf lunches and satiety will be measured by visual analogue scales. They will consume an ad lib snack after 3 hours and food intake will be measured.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

healthy, non-smoking, BMI of 18-27, non-dieting, typically consumes breakfast/lunch

Exclusion criteria

distaste for beans, vegetarian, current smoker, restrained eating habits, recent weight change, history of significant disease of past medical history, pregnant, lactating irregular menstrual cycle

Treatment and study plan

Other: Bean patty

Other

Other: Beef patty

Other

Primary outcomes

  1. satiety

    Time frame: 180 minutes

    Measure satiety by visual analogue scale (VAS)

Secondary outcomes

  1. food intake

    Time frame: 180 minutes

    assorted snacks provided to assess food intake variation between treatments

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Jul 19, 2013
Registry last updated
Apr 9, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.