Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
NCT Number: NCT06596564
The primary objective of this study was to examine whether four nudging strategies influence beverage consumption behavior among Chinese university students. These interventions included sugar content information, health warning messages, hedonic labeling, and default option nudge. A between-subjects experimental design with a single factor was employed to assess the effects of these strategies on students' choices between sugar-sweetened and sugar-free beverages, thereby evaluating their effectiveness in promoting healthier beverage selections.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
As the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and chronic diseases continues to escalate, excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has emerged as a growing public health concern globally. One approach to reducing beverage intake while conserving resources is the utilization of nudge strategies. Nudge strategies, characterized by their low cost and ease of implementation, facilitate individuals in making more accurate and beneficial choices in a predictable manner, through subtle interventions that do not prohibit any options or significantly alter incentives. This nudge experiment will be conducted in a classroom setting, where participants will be randomly assigned to one of five groups for beverage selection, completing a menu-based choice task: a no-nudge control group, a default option group, a hedonic labeling group, a sugar content information group, and a health warning nudge group.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Display the sugar content of the drink on the platform.
Time frame: day 1
The probability of choosing a sugar-free beverage (binary outcome: sugar-sweetened = 0, sugar-free = 1) across five menu-selection tasks.
Time frame: day 1
A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was employed. Higher scores indicate greater perceived intrusiveness.
Time frame: day 1
A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was employed. Higher scores indicate greater support for the nudging strategy
Time frame: day 1
A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) was employed. Higher scores indicate greater perceived effectiveness.
Nanjing Medical University
Other
A Study on Nudge Interventions to Promote Changes in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Behaviors Among College Students
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05442424
Behavior, Body Weight
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06263621
Behavior, Body Weight
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04893213
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT04442139
Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Behavior
Khanna, Punjab, India
View Trial Details