2 Division of Nephrology,Department of Medicine Pramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine,Thailand
Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
NCT Number: NCT06027398
The real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is regarded as the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Proper specimen collection and obtaining a sufficient sample are the most important steps for laboratory diagnosis. The nasopharyngeal (NP) swab is recommended as the reference collection method. However, NP swab collection is invasive and uncomfortable for patients and poses some risk to healthcare workers. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection from used surgical masks with the NP swab method using RT-PCR testing
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
Proper specimen collection and obtaining sufficient samples are the most important steps for laboratory diagnosis of an infectious disease. Improper collection may lead to false or inconclusive test results. During the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, the Center for Disease Prevention and Control recommended collecting and testing an upper respiratory specimen [4]. Nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs are the preferred choice for initial SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection from used surgical masks with standard detection methods. We tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in masks from patients with COVID-19 that had been worn for eight hours and compared this with NP swabs using RT-PCR testing. Hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were recruited to provide surgical masks. Collection of used surgical mask samples by patients themselves is easy, convenient, requires no sampling equipment and decreases the risk of healthcare personnel exposure to COVID-19. If SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be detected on used surgical mask samples, this may encourage patients to provide specimens for testing and help in early detection and transmission prevention. As an alternative method to NP swabs, it may facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in used mask filters
Time frame: 3 months
tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in masks from patients with COVID-19 that had been worn for eight hours and compared this with NP swabs using RT-PCR testing
Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital
Other Gov
Efficacy of SARS-COV-2 Detection From Used Surgical Mask Compared to Standard Detection Method
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05765396
COVID-19, COVID-19 Pneumonia
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05060926
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Respiration Disorders
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05543616
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06784739
COVID 19, COVID-19
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial Details