AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2%
DrugAN2728 Topical Ointment, 2%
NCT Number: NCT01652885
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, and systemic exposure of AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2%, in subjects with atopic dermatitis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Anacor Investigational Site, Fremont, California, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
≥10% and ≤35% of the total body surface area(BSA)
Exclusion criteria
AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2%
Time frame: Baseline
Local tolerability symptoms, burning or stinging, were classified according to severity as: 1) none = no stinging or burning, 2) mild = slight warm, tingling sensation; not really troublesome, 3) moderate = definite warm; tingling or stinging sensation; troublesome and 4) severe = hot, tingling or stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort. Number of participants with local tolerability symptoms according to severity on Baseline were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 2
Local tolerability symptoms, burning or stinging, were classified according to severity as: 1) none = no stinging or burning, 2) mild = slight warm, tingling sensation; not really troublesome, 3) moderate = definite warm; tingling or stinging sensation; troublesome and 4) severe = hot, tingling or stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort. Number of participants with local tolerability symptoms according to severity on Day 2 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 4
Local tolerability symptoms, burning or stinging, were classified according to severity as: 1) none = no stinging or burning, 2) mild = slight warm, tingling sensation; not really troublesome, 3) moderate = definite warm; tingling or stinging sensation; troublesome and 4) severe = hot, tingling or stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort. Number of participants with local tolerability symptoms according to severity on Day 4 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 6
Local tolerability symptoms, burning or stinging, were classified according to severity as: 1) none = no stinging or burning, 2) mild = slight warm, tingling sensation; not really troublesome, 3) moderate = definite warm; tingling or stinging sensation; troublesome and 4) severe = hot, tingling or stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort. Number of participants with local tolerability symptoms according to severity on Day 6 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 8
Local tolerability symptoms, burning or stinging, were classified according to severity as: 1) none = no stinging or burning, 2) mild = slight warm, tingling sensation; not really troublesome, 3) moderate = definite warm; tingling or stinging sensation; troublesome and 4) severe = hot, tingling or stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort. Number of participants with local tolerability symptoms according to severity on Day 8 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 9
Local tolerability symptoms, burning or stinging, were classified according to severity as: 1) none = no stinging or burning, 2) mild = slight warm, tingling sensation; not really troublesome, 3) moderate = definite warm; tingling or stinging sensation; troublesome and 4) severe = hot, tingling or stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort. Number of participants with local tolerability symptoms according to severity on Day 9 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 15
Local tolerability symptoms, burning or stinging, were classified according to severity as: 1) none = no stinging or burning, 2) mild = slight warm, tingling sensation; not really troublesome, 3) moderate = definite warm; tingling or stinging sensation; troublesome and 4) severe = hot, tingling or stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort. Number of participants with local tolerability symptoms according to severity on Day 15 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 22
Local tolerability symptoms, burning or stinging, were classified according to severity as: 1) none = no stinging or burning, 2) mild = slight warm, tingling sensation; not really troublesome, 3) moderate = definite warm; tingling or stinging sensation; troublesome and 4) severe = hot, tingling or stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort. Number of participants with local tolerability symptoms according to severity on Day 22 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 29
Local tolerability symptoms, burning or stinging, were classified according to severity as: 1) none = no stinging or burning, 2) mild = slight warm, tingling sensation; not really troublesome, 3) moderate = definite warm; tingling or stinging sensation; troublesome and 4) severe = hot, tingling or stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort. Number of participants with local tolerability symptoms according to severity on Day 29 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Day 29
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death;initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to Day 29 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Day 29
Vital signs (temperature, respiratory rate, pulse, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Clinical significance of vital signs was determined at the investigator's discretion.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Day 29
Laboratory parameters included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, platelet and white blood cell count, neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes), chemistry (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, sodium, potassium, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, total protein and serum pregnancy test [for all female participants]) and urine (urine pregnancy test [for all female participants]). Clinical significance of laboratory parameters was determined at the investigator's discretion.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1
Maximum observed plasma concentration of AN2728 and its two identified oxidative metabolites, AN7602 and AN8323 on Day 1 was reported in the outcome measure.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1
Time to reach maximum plasma concentration of AN2728 and its two identified oxidative metabolites, AN7602 and AN8323 on Day 1 was reported in the outcome measure.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 hours post-dose on Day 1
Area under the concentration-time curve from hour zero to the 12 hour post-dose measurable concentration, of AN2728 and its two identified oxidative metabolites, AN7602 and AN8323 on Day 1 was reported in the outcome measure.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1
Apparent terminal half-life, of AN2728 and its two identified oxidative metabolites, AN7602 and AN8323 on Day 1 was reported in the outcome measure. Apparent terminal half-life is the time measured for the drug concentration to decrease by one-half in plasma.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 8
Maximum observed plasma concentration of AN2728 and its two identified oxidative metabolites, AN7602 and AN8323 on Day 8 was reported in the outcome measure.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 8
Time to reach maximum plasma concentration of AN2728 and its two identified oxidative metabolites, AN7602 and AN8323 on Day 8 was reported in the outcome measure.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 hours post-dose on Day 8
Area under the concentration-time curve from hour zero to the 12 hour post-dose measurable concentration, of AN2728 and its two identified oxidative metabolites, AN7602 and AN8323 on Day 8 was reported in the outcome measure.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 8
Apparent terminal half-life, of AN2728 and its two identified oxidative metabolites, AN7602 and AN8323 on Day 8 was reported in the outcome measure. Apparent terminal half-life is the time measured for the drug concentration to decrease by one-half in plasma.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 29
ISGA assess severity of atopic dermatitis on a 5 point scale ranged from 0 (clear) to 4 (maximum severe), where higher scores indicate higher degree of atopic dermatitis. Grades for classification of severity: 0= clear (minor residual discoloration, no erythema or induration or papulation, no oozing or crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration or papulation and no oozing or crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration or papulation and no oozing or crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration or papulation with or without oozing or crusting) and 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration or papulation and with oozing or crusting). Treatment success was defined as ISGA score of 0 or 1, and a minimum improvement of 2 grades in ISGA from Baseline to Day 29.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8, 15, 22, 29
5 signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis were: 1) erythema, 2) pruritus, 3) exudation, 4) excoriation and 5) lichenification. The severity of each of these 5 signs and symptoms were assessed on a 4 point scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Higher scores (for each of the 5 signs and symptoms) indicate higher degree of severity of atopic dermatitis.
Pfizer
Industry
An Open-Label Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Profile of AN2728 Ointment in Adolescents With Atopic Dermatitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06324812
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Dermatitis
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04365387
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Dermatitis
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06173284
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Dermatitis
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03422822
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Dermatitis
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details