Interventional Center of Valvular Heart Disease, Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000, China
NCT Number: NCT07414225
This study is a prospective, randomized, parallel-control, open-label, multicenter clinical trial. Eligible subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the Device group (Interventional group) or to no Device group (Control Group). The objective is to identify the safety and effectiveness of the TEER for the treatment of moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) atrial functional mitral regurgitation (aFMR) in patients who are symptomatic despite maximally tolerated guideline directed medical therapy.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000, China
Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is a complex cardiovascular condition typified by mitral regurgitation (MR), primarily due to atrial fibrillation-induced or diastolic dysfunction-induced left atrial enlargement, with mitral annular dilation and functional alterations of the mitral valve, rather than intrinsic valvular defects, resulting in regurgitation1. The reported prevalence of AFMR varies across studies, attributable to discrepancies in definitions, diagnostic techniques, research designs, and the specific populations investigated2-8. In a cohort study of hospitalized patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation, the prevalence of moderate or severe AFMR was 7%1. Conversely, in a community-based screening cohort of patients with moderate or severe MR, AFMR accounted for 27% of cases, marginally lower than the proportions of ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (VFMR, 38%) and primary mitral regurgitation (PMR, 32%)9. It can be anticipated that with the acceleration of aging in the global population, the proportion of AFMR may witness a considerable expansion in the future.
Compared with PMR, patients with AFMR frequently present with greater symptoms, diminished exercise tolerance, and heightened risk for hospitalization due to heart failure and increased mortality9,10, underscoring AFMR as a challenging therapeutic scenario. The conventional management strategies for mitral regurgitation have proven less effective in cases of AFMR2,11,12, due to its unique pathophysiological mechanisms, highlighting the imperative for customized treatment modalities.
Optimized guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) has been the cornerstone of treatment for heart failure and associated valvular diseases, including AFMR13. GDMT for heart failure with reduced LVEF typically includes a combination of a beta-blockers, ACE inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blockers or ARNI, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, an SGLT2 inhibitor, and diuretics, along with anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy for specific patients. However, the effectiveness of GDMT in treating AFMR specifically in whom the LVEF is typically preserved (≥50%) is not well-established14, as most prior studies have focused on PMR or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. From the pathophysiological perspective of AFMR, strategies that restore sinus rhythm from atrial fibrillation have the potential to improve the prognosis of AFMR. Atrial fibrillation cardioversion may reduce the severity of MR, restore atrial size, enhance cardiac diastolic function, and decrease the incidence of endpoint events15-19. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has emerged as a promising intervention for MR, in all patients with ventricular FMR and in those with PMR who are at high or prohibitive surgical risk14,20-22. Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of TEER in reducing the severity of MR, improving symptoms, and enhancing quality of life in patients with secondary MR23-25. However, its role in AFMR, a subset of secondary MR, is less clear.
Given the distinct pathophysiology of AFMR and the lack of consensus on optimal management, there is a pressing need for clinical trials comparing the efficacy of TEER versus GDMT in this patient population. Such trials are crucial for informing clinical practice and guiding treatment decisions in AFMR. This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of TEER and GDMT in the management of AFMR, filling a significant knowledge gap in current research and potentially influencing future guidelines and patient care strategies.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
a) Diuretics as needed to treat pulmonary congestion and peripheral edema b) If atrial fibrillation: Rate control medication to ensure heart rate <110 bpm c) If HFpEF: i. SGLT2i for at least 2 months (required) ii. MRAs, e.g., spironolactone or finerenone) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs, e.g., sacubitril/valsartan) may be used at the discretion of each center (but should not be changed after randomization) 6. SBP <140 mmHg and HR <100 bpm (<110 bpm if in atrial fibrillation) 7. Atrial fibrillation ablation is determined by the local heart team. If ablation is deemed necessary, it will be performed prior to enrollment; if ablation is considered unsuitable, no ablation will be performed after enrollment.
Exclusion criteria
The intervention to be implemented in this clinical study is Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER), a minimally invasive, image-guided interventional procedure specifically designed for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Time to first occurrence of a composite event of death from any cause, hospitalization for [worsening] heart failure or unplanned outpatient [worsening] heart failure event within 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 30 days
Primary safety endpoint is the composite of the following events within 30 days
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
All hospitalization for [worsening] heart failure or outpatient [worsening] heart failure events at 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
All-cause mortality at 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
MR reduction from baseline to 30 days, 12 months and 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
MR severity of 1+ or less at 30 days, 12 months and 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Rate of MR severity of 2+ or less at 30 days, 12 months and 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Degree of NYHA functional class change from baseline to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 month
Improvement in KCCQ score from baseline to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Improvement in 6-minute walk distance from baseline to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Reduction in LAVI from baseline to 12 months and 24 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Secondary safety endpoint is a composite of stroke, myocardial infraction, non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device related complications, durable LVAD implant or heart transplantation
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years:
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The echocardiographic endpoints will be reported at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 30 days and 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoint will be reported at 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 6month, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 years
The clinical endpoints will be reported at 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years and 5 years
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Guangyuan Song, M.D.
CONTACT
Sanshuai Chang, M.D.
CONTACT
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Other
Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation - The STAR Trial
Acronym: STAR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06883864
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03453853
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Daegu, Dalseo-gu, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07539298
Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT06911099
Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Cardiovascular Diseases
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial Details