Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03453853

Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation Response In Mitral Loop Cerclage Annuloplasty (AFRICA Study)

To evaluate second stage safety and feasibility of Mitral Loop Cerclage(MLC) Annuloplasty with CSTV for repair of functional mitral regurgitation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Primary location

Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Dalseo-gu, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The objective of this prospective, single-center, open label, feasibility test is to assess the safety and efficacy of Mitral Loop Cerclage Annuloplasty with CSTV protective device, in treating functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) associated with heart failure and Atrial Fibrillation mitral regurgitation Response in Mitral Loop Cerclage annuloplasty.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • NYHA(New York Heart Association) Class III - IV
  • and, Functional Mitral Regurgitation 3+ (Moderate/Severe) or 4+ (Severe) in spite of optimal medical treatment.

(For optimal medical treatments, ①ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker ②β-blocker ③ aldosterone antagonists should be given for at least 3 months unless the subject has contraindication for each drug)

  • and, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation in electrocardiography (Persistent AF or Permanent AF)

Exclusion criteria

  • Primary Mitral Regurgitation
  • LV ejection fraction lower than 30%
  • Pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 60mmHg
  • End-diastolic Left ventricular dimension ≥ 70mm
  • Subjects with functional MR who need CABG or AVR performed
  • Pre-existing stent in a coronary artery that is deemed to be in direct contact with the path of mitral loop cerclage along coronary sinus
  • Subjects who have functional MR caused by aortic valve disease
  • Subjects who have uncontrollable hyperthyroidism
  • Subjects who have severe TR due to primary valve leaflet disease
  • Anomaly of Coronary Sinus
  • Pre-existing devices in coronary sinus such as Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator and Pacemaker
  • 2:1 Atriventricular AV block or higher AV block and ventricular tachycardia
  • Subjects with primary MR
  • Subjects who cannot be screened by cardiac CT
  • Subjects who have possibility of coronary artery pinching even with Mitral Loop Cerclage system judged by cardiac CT
  • Subjects who do not have septal vein or have unsuitable septal vein anatomy by cardiac CT or venogram
  • Subjects who have thrombosis and embolism
  • Creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL
  • Subjects who have coagulation disorders
  • Subjects who are unable to take anti-platelet agents
  • Pre-existing devices such as Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator and Pacemaker
  • Subjects who are pregnant, or lactating, or plan pregnancy during the clinical trials
  • Subjects who are participated in other clinical trials within 1 month of enrollment
  • Subjects who are deemed not to be eligible in this study by physician's discretion

Treatment and study plan

Mitral Loop Cerclage Annuloplasty

Device

Atrial Functional mitral regurgitation Response In mitral loop Cerclage Annuloplasty

Other names: (MLC-B-45-75-R and other 11 models)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of mitral regurgitation severity(1)

    Time frame: 1 month

    changing regurgitant volume (RV,mL) compared with baseline

  2. Change of mitral regurgitation severity(2)

    Time frame: 1 month

    changing effective regurgitant orifice (ERO,cm^2) compared with baseline

  3. Change in mitral annulus geometry

    Time frame: 1 month

    septal lateral dimension(mm)

  4. Rate of adverse events as a measure of safety

    Time frame: 1 month

    Rate of composite endpoint of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Event) *death, myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, device related cardiac surgery, stroke

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of mitral regurgitation severity(1)

    Time frame: 6 months

    changing regurgitant volume (RV,mL) compared with baseline

  2. Change of mitral regurgitation severity(2)

    Time frame: 6 months

    changing effective regurgitant orifice (ERO,cm^2) compared with baseline

  3. Change in mitral annulus geometry

    Time frame: 6 months

    septal lateral dimension(mm)

  4. Change in left ventricle volumes

    Time frame: 6 months

    Changing of End-diastolic phase LV volumes(mL)

  5. Electrical remodeling

    Time frame: 6 months

    change in electrocardiography (conversion of atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm)

  6. Change in subjects' symptoms referred to NYHA Classification System

    Time frame: 6 months

    NYHA (New York Heart Association)

  7. Technical success rate of the implantation

    Time frame: 6 months

    Technical feasibility by the implantation success rate (%)

  8. Rate of adverse events as a measure of safety

    Time frame: 6 months

    Rate of composite endpoint of MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Event) *death, myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, device related cardiac surgery, stroke

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tau-MEDICAL Co., Ltd.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

The Study for Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation Response In Mitral Loop Cerclage Annuloplasty (AFRICA Study): Multi-center, Open Label, Single Arm, Feasibility Test

Acronym: AFRICA

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2021
First posted
Mar 5, 2018
Registry last updated
Apr 26, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.