Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00975923

Safe Critical Care: Testing Improvement Strategies

One group of hospitals participated in a collaborative approach for healthcare quality improvement while another group was provided only a tool kit. The investigators' objective was to determine if the Collaborative would perform better at preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP). Hospitals were randomized to the Tool Kit or Collaborative conditions. The investigators' study evaluated the effects on care processes and outcomes of a multi-institutional quality improvement initiative focused on preventing hospital associate infections. The investigators' hypothesis was that the strategies for implementing safe critical care practice will differ in level of achievement whereby the Collaborative group will perform better than the Tool Kit group. The outcome measure comprised clinical event rates and an index of safe practices that represent a bundling of key process measures related to evidence-based practices for preventing catheter-related blood-stream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) Cross Infection Disease Attributes Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia Iatrogenic Disease Infections Lung Diseases Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Pneumonia Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated Respiratory Tract Diseases Respiratory Tract Infections Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Age range

1 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

HCA Hospital Corporation of America

Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States

About this study

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) methodologies provide a framework for initiating and sustaining improvements in complex systems.1 By definition, CQI engages frontline staff in iterative problem solving using plan-do-study-act cycles of learning, with decision-making based on real-time process measurements. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) has sponsored Breakthrough Series (BTS) Collaboratives since 1996 to accelerate the uptake and impact of quality improvement. These collaboratives are typically guided by evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, incorporate change methodologies, and rely on clinical and process improvement subject matter experts. Organizations have been adopting the collaborative model, and there is a growing literature on its positive impact. This collaborative approach to healthcare improvement has appealing face validity but lacks definitive evidence of its effectiveness. A recent derivative of collaboratives has been deployment of tool kits for quality improvement. Intuition suggests that such tools kits may help to enable change, and, thus some agencies advocate the simpler approach of disseminating tool kits as a change strategy. We sought to compare the collaborative model with the tool kit model for improving care. Recommendations and guidelines for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) prevention have not been implemented reliably, resulting in unnecessary ICU morbidity and mortality and fostering a national call for improvement. Our study evaluated the effects on care processes and outcomes of a multi-institutional quality improvement initiative focused on preventing CLABSI and VAP in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Medical centers with at least one adult or pediatric ICU.
  • Medical centers within the Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) were eligible for enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Nonresponse to invitation to participate in our Safe Critical Care Initiative.

Treatment and study plan

Collaborative Group

Behavioral

In addition to the Tool Kit materials and web site support, facility leaders and managers in this group agreed to participate in a Collaborative to improve critical care. The Collaborative differed from the IHI BTS model in that teams did not come together for face-to-face educational and planning sessions but instead attended web seminars and teleconferences. Between these "virtual" learning sessions, teams implemented some of the suggested change ideas, measured the results of those changes, and reported back to the larger group. Teams were supported through monthly educational and troubleshooting conference calls, individual coaching by faculty members, and an e-mail listserver designed to stimulate interaction among teams.

Other names: Collaborative Breakthrough Groups, Collaborative Quality Improvement Groups

Tool Kit

Behavioral

Hospitals received a tool kit:evidence-based guidelines, CLABSI/VAP fact sheets, change ideas,quality improvement and teamwork methods, standardized data collection and charting tools. Periodic reminders of their commitment to the Safe Critical Care Initiative and access to web site containing all of the educational seminars, clinical tools, and quality improvement tools. ICUs in this group were on their own to initiate and implement a local hospital quality improvement initiative preventing CLABSI and VAP.

Other names: Quality Improvement

Primary outcomes

  1. CLABSI and VAP Rates

    Time frame: 18 Months: 3-month baseline and quarterly post-intervention periods

    Central line associated bloodstream infections(CLABSI) and ventilator associated pneumonias (VAP) using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions as number of events per 1,000 device days, data collection and surveillance methods.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Access of Tools and Use of Quality Improvement Strategies

    Time frame: 18 months

    Follow-up survey of ICU nurse and quality managers for all participating medical centers from Jan 2008 through April 2008 included questions about the implementation of process interventions: Access and use of clinical guidelines tools, access and use of quality improvement tools, and types of quality improvement implementation strategies.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Sep 14, 2009
Registry last updated
Jan 12, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.