Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust
London, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT05493072
Background
Medication errors are the leading cause of preventable harm in healthcare settings worldwide. An estimated 237 million medication errors occur in England alone every year, with 66 million considered clinically significant. There is an estimated cost to the NHS from definitely avoidable adverse drug reactions as a result of these errors of £98.5 million per year, consuming 181,626 bed-days and causing to 712 deaths.
Medication related clinical decision support systems, often integrated with electronic prescribing systems, are rapidly increasing in number over the last few decades, ranging from drug-drug interaction alerts to allergy checks and formulary support. A recent systematic review summarised that these systems are still relatively immature, with limited use of patient-specific input or human factors research used to develop them. There is an opportunity to improve these systems significantly for the benefit of the user and for patient safety. The World Health Organization propose that interventions to reduce medication error should include the development of technologies that are well understood and designed for the systems and practice they are applied to.
Human factors and usability engineering is an integral part of developing medical devices, such as clinical decision support (CDS) systems, to ensure that such devices are easy to use and can be used safely as intended. User testing / usability testing, which may incorporate several methods, should be conductive throughout the development process (at formative, summative assessment, and during post-market surveillance). These methods are now becoming more common place in healthcare technology research and should continue to support the development of new technologies.
RxConnect
RxConnect, a newly registered UKCA marked medical device, is an on-demand clinical decision support tool that receives medication and patient inputs and uses them to filter an underlying formulary, such as the BNF, and perform dosing calculations, as needed, to return patient-specific dosing recommendations. RxConnect does not have a user interface and relies on an integration with third-party systems, such as electronic prescribing systems, to deliver CDS services to clinical end users. For this study a prototype user interface for RxConnect that emulates a typical electronic prescribing system will be used.
The study team hypothesise that use of RxConnect as a digital prescribing aid is quicker, easier, and as safe to use as currently available prescribing aids. This study aims to utilise user testing to prove or disprove the above hypothesis and to generate quantitative and qualitative outputs to support the continued development of RxConnect prior to clinical deployment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
London, United Kingdom
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants use RxConnect, an on-demand clinical decision support tool that receives medication and patient inputs and uses them to filter an underlying formulary, such as the BNF, and perform dosing calculations, as needed, to return patient-specific dosing recommendations.
Time frame: 60 minutes
Sub analysis of errors by type available in full report
Time frame: 60 minutes
Dosing errors with a deviation of more than 25% from the recommended range were categorised as large magnitude errors.
Time frame: 60 minutes
For the first scenario, TTP was calculated from the moment the participant began reading the scenario to task completion, while for subsequent scenarios, timing started from the completion of the previous scenario. The endpoint for each scenario was marked by the participant's submission of the medication order on the electronic prescribing (eP) system.
Time frame: 60 minutes
Measurement of the Prescribers perceived mental load per prescribing scenario, Using NASA task load index (TLX).
An overall workload score combining all 6 NASA TLX domains was calculated (minimum 0 lower workload - maximum 126 highest workload).
Time frame: 60 minutes
Erroneous orders identified as a primary outcome of the study will then be analysed using hierarchical task analysis (HTA). The HTA is a qualitative outcome, different from the primary outcome (error yes/no) by instead identifying 'where' within the prescribing process an error occurred.
Workflow steps, representing tasks or actions in both the control and intervention arms, were developed based on established and anticipated prescribing workflows and refined as new, unanticipated steps emerged during study observations. These workflows were then employed for hierarchical task analysis, as detailed in the data analysis section.
Hierarchical task analysis was conducted by reviewing recordings of all erroneous medication orders, breaking down the prescribing process into discrete steps. This structured approach allowed for identification of potential risks or inefficiencies in the workflow, helping trace each error's likely origin within the process.
Time frame: 60 minutes
Audio of interviews will be transcribed verbatim and thematically analyses to provide insights from participants that can be utilised for recommendations for practice and research.
Imperial College London
Other
Safety, Performance, and User Perceptions of RxConnect When Used to Provide Patient-specific, Indication Based Prescribing Support
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02496312
Apathy, Behavior
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06191822
App Proficiency, Behavior
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04826276
Behavior
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05715190
Behavior, Health Behavior
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial Details