Standard technique group
DeviceIn the standard technique group (n = 63), the PLMA was inserted by index finger insertion technique.
Other names: Digital insertion group
NCT Number: NCT01076725
Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients using the 90 degree rotational technique is more successful and causes less pharyngeal trauma than the standard technique in pediatric patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me3 year–9 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
In our previous series of studies, we introduced a new, simple and effective 90 degree rotational insertion technique and the insertion success rate was great and less pain occurred with the rotational technique in adult. In this study, we investigated whether the 90 degree rotational technique will improve the insertion success rate than the standard technique in pediatric patients.
We hypothesized that the 90 degree rotational technique will improve the insertion success rate and decrease the complication of 2 to 3 size PLMA than the standard index finger insertion technique in children.
One hundred twenty six Asian pediatric patients were randomly allocated to a standard technique group or rotation technique group. The size of the PLMA was from 2 to 3 according to body weight of children. In the standard technique group (n = 63), the PLMA was inserted by index finger insertion technique. In the rotation technique group (n = 63), the entire cuff of the PLMA was placed in the mouth without finger insertion in a midline approach and was rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise around the tongue. The PLMA was then advanced and rotated back until resistance was felt.
The primary outcome was success at first insertion. Secondary outcome measures were insertion time and complications.
Success at first insertion was significantly higher for the rotation technique than the standard technique, and significantly less time was required. With the rotation technique, the incidence of PLMA repositioning and blood staining was significantly less than for the standard technique.
The rotational insertion technique for PLMA is more successful than the standard insertion technique and is associated with fewer blood staining on the PLMA which suggests that it causes less pharyngeal trauma in pediatric patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In the standard technique group (n = 63), the PLMA was inserted by index finger insertion technique.
Other names: Digital insertion group
The entire cuff of the PLMA was placed in the mouth without finger insertion in a midline approach and was rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise around the tongue. The PLMA was then advanced and rotated back until resistance was felt.
Other names: 90 degree rotation insertion
Time frame: 5 minute
% of success at first trial
Time frame: 5 min-4 hrs
Insertion time is an indices of the ease of insertion. Sealing pressure is an equilibrium airway pressure (maximum allowed = 40 cmH2O) when the expiratory valve of the breathing circuit was closed and a gas flow rate of 3 l/min was maintained. Blood on the surface of the cuff, incidence of postoperative sore throat or hoarseness are indices of complications.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Other
Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway is More Successful With the 90 Degree Rotation Technique in Pediatric Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: PLMA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07730918
Hemodynamic Instability During Anesthesia, Induction Anesthesia
Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05825560
Intubation
Nîmes, Gard, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05719194
Intubation, Mechanical Ventilation
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07125495
Infection, Infections
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details