ROSE (presence of cytotech) & liquid prep
OtherStandard of care EBUS will include presence of trained cytotechnologist providing on-site cytopathology feedback to bronchoscopist during the procedure. Sample is liquid.
NCT Number: NCT04945317
This research study is being done to compare two ways to conduct bronchoscopic biopsy of lymph nodes and other structures in the chest (i.e. the presence or absence of an on-site cytotechnologist performing a limited microscopic evaluation to provide non-binding feedback on specimen adequacy in real time during the procedure).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a highly safe and effective bronchoscopic procedure that can achieve diagnostic yields of over 90% for lung cancer - similar to those with the more-invasive surgical mediastinoscopy - with EBUS enjoying the advantage of a near 0% complication rate in several large studies. This has led to EBUS becoming the procedure of choice for mediastinal staging of lung cancer. Increasingly, bronchoscopists are being asked to perform EBUS not only for lung cancer staging but also for tissue acquisition for molecular markers to assess for mutations that can be treated with biologic therapy. However, a frequently encountered clinical scenario is that while an EBUS is diagnostic for lung cancer, it is non-diagnostic for molecular testing because of an insufficient amount of tissue material being collected. According to multiple studies, the "molecular yield" for EBUS in lung cancer can range from 74-82%. These studies have not specifically looked at adequacy of biomarkers, which could be distinctly different considering that evaluation of biomarkers requires more tissue for next generation sequencing (NGS). Currently, Johns Hopkins Hospital uses NGS as standard of care for identifying mutations associated with malignant cells. NGS analysis, which is usually reported as a percentage of cells that express one of many biomarkers currently being tested as standard of care, is performed via immunohistochemistry (IHC), necessitating the presence of a sufficiently cellular material with >100 tumor cells for reliable quantitative characterization. To the investigator's knowledge, the rates of NGS biomarker sufficiency have not been prospectively analyzed to date.
Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is an optional step during EBUS bronchoscopy in which an on-site cytotechnologist performs a limited microscopic evaluation to provide non-binding feedback on specimen adequacy in real time during the procedure. The cytotechnologist can also aid specimen processing e.g. through creation of a "tissue clot" in addition to use of the more standard liquid-based medium. At Johns Hopkins, EBUS procedures are routinely performed both with and without ROSE since the presence or absence of ROSE during EBUS has not been shown to impact diagnostic yield or procedural safety. However, its impact on NGS biomarker sufficiency has not been tested to the investigator's knowledge.
This study aims to investigate whether ROSE can impact NGS biomarker sufficiency by assisting the bronchoscopist in obtaining adequate tissue from the appropriate site. The hypothesis is that ROSE will decrease the rate of insufficient tumor tissue to permit NGS biomarker testing.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Standard of care EBUS will include presence of trained cytotechnologist providing on-site cytopathology feedback to bronchoscopist during the procedure. Sample is liquid.
Standard of care EBUS will NOT include presence of trained cytotechnologist providing on-site cytopathology feedback to bronchoscopist during the procedure. Sample is liquid.
Standard of care EBUS will include presence of trained cytotechnologist providing on-site cytopathology feedback to bronchoscopist during the procedure. Sample is a tissue clot.
Standard of care EBUS will NOT include presence of trained cytotechnologist providing on-site cytopathology feedback to bronchoscopist during the procedure. Sample is a tissue clot.
Time frame: within 60 days of procedure
NGS biomarker sufficiency - percentage of NGS biomarker testing attempts that were successful due to sufficient tissue
Time frame: within 60 days of procedure
PD-1 sufficiency - amount of the protein "Programmed Cell Death Protein 1" (PD-1) expressed on immune cells = 500 cells/20% cellularity
Time frame: During Procedure
Number of targets (including lymph node stations, other lesions) sampled per EBUS
Time frame: During Procedure
Number of passes taken from the target site
Time frame: During Procedure
Number of secondary procedures performed (such as radial EBUS, navigational bronchoscopy)
Time frame: Within 30 days of procedure
Need for repeat EBUS or another procedure due to non-diagnostic or insufficient sample during a 30-day follow up period (binary value: yes/no)
Time frame: During Procedure
Procedure time (measured in minutes)
Time frame: Within 7 days of the procedure
Procedural complications observed during a one-week follow up period
Johns Hopkins University
Other
Rapid Onsite Cytopathologic Evaluation for Improved Molecular Marker Testing Via Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: ROSE/NoROSE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06730685
Atrophy, Body Weight
Næstved, Region Sjælland, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06710132
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Santa Monica, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06170788
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05891171
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details