Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT04945317

ROSE for Improved Molecular Marker Testing Via EBUS

This research study is being done to compare two ways to conduct bronchoscopic biopsy of lymph nodes and other structures in the chest (i.e. the presence or absence of an on-site cytotechnologist performing a limited microscopic evaluation to provide non-binding feedback on specimen adequacy in real time during the procedure).

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a highly safe and effective bronchoscopic procedure that can achieve diagnostic yields of over 90% for lung cancer - similar to those with the more-invasive surgical mediastinoscopy - with EBUS enjoying the advantage of a near 0% complication rate in several large studies. This has led to EBUS becoming the procedure of choice for mediastinal staging of lung cancer. Increasingly, bronchoscopists are being asked to perform EBUS not only for lung cancer staging but also for tissue acquisition for molecular markers to assess for mutations that can be treated with biologic therapy. However, a frequently encountered clinical scenario is that while an EBUS is diagnostic for lung cancer, it is non-diagnostic for molecular testing because of an insufficient amount of tissue material being collected. According to multiple studies, the "molecular yield" for EBUS in lung cancer can range from 74-82%. These studies have not specifically looked at adequacy of biomarkers, which could be distinctly different considering that evaluation of biomarkers requires more tissue for next generation sequencing (NGS). Currently, Johns Hopkins Hospital uses NGS as standard of care for identifying mutations associated with malignant cells. NGS analysis, which is usually reported as a percentage of cells that express one of many biomarkers currently being tested as standard of care, is performed via immunohistochemistry (IHC), necessitating the presence of a sufficiently cellular material with >100 tumor cells for reliable quantitative characterization. To the investigator's knowledge, the rates of NGS biomarker sufficiency have not been prospectively analyzed to date.

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is an optional step during EBUS bronchoscopy in which an on-site cytotechnologist performs a limited microscopic evaluation to provide non-binding feedback on specimen adequacy in real time during the procedure. The cytotechnologist can also aid specimen processing e.g. through creation of a "tissue clot" in addition to use of the more standard liquid-based medium. At Johns Hopkins, EBUS procedures are routinely performed both with and without ROSE since the presence or absence of ROSE during EBUS has not been shown to impact diagnostic yield or procedural safety. However, its impact on NGS biomarker sufficiency has not been tested to the investigator's knowledge.

This study aims to investigate whether ROSE can impact NGS biomarker sufficiency by assisting the bronchoscopist in obtaining adequate tissue from the appropriate site. The hypothesis is that ROSE will decrease the rate of insufficient tumor tissue to permit NGS biomarker testing.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inpatients or outpatients >18 years old
  • Capable of informed consent
  • Known or suspected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Referred to the interventional pulmonary team at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (JHBMC), or other participating sites for tissue sampling of a hilar/mediastinal lymph node or another lesion accessible by convex-probe (CP) EBUS

Exclusion criteria

  • Refuse participation
  • Standard contraindications to EBUS and bronchoscopy in general: bleeding disorders, antiplatelet or anticoagulant usage, high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) requirement, and clinical instability
  • Pregnant women
  • Cytotechnologist not available at the time of screening, enrollment, or randomization

Treatment and study plan

ROSE (presence of cytotech) & liquid prep

Other

Standard of care EBUS will include presence of trained cytotechnologist providing on-site cytopathology feedback to bronchoscopist during the procedure. Sample is liquid.

NO-ROSE (absence of cytotech) & liquid prep

Other

Standard of care EBUS will NOT include presence of trained cytotechnologist providing on-site cytopathology feedback to bronchoscopist during the procedure. Sample is liquid.

ROSE (presence of cytotech) & tissue clot sample

Other

Standard of care EBUS will include presence of trained cytotechnologist providing on-site cytopathology feedback to bronchoscopist during the procedure. Sample is a tissue clot.

NO-ROSE (absence of cytotech) & tissue clot sample

Other

Standard of care EBUS will NOT include presence of trained cytotechnologist providing on-site cytopathology feedback to bronchoscopist during the procedure. Sample is a tissue clot.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of NGS biomarker testing attempts

    Time frame: within 60 days of procedure

    NGS biomarker sufficiency - percentage of NGS biomarker testing attempts that were successful due to sufficient tissue

Secondary outcomes

  1. Level of Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1)

    Time frame: within 60 days of procedure

    PD-1 sufficiency - amount of the protein "Programmed Cell Death Protein 1" (PD-1) expressed on immune cells = 500 cells/20% cellularity

  2. Number of targets

    Time frame: During Procedure

    Number of targets (including lymph node stations, other lesions) sampled per EBUS

  3. Number of passes (ROSE arms only)

    Time frame: During Procedure

    Number of passes taken from the target site

  4. Number of secondary procedures

    Time frame: During Procedure

    Number of secondary procedures performed (such as radial EBUS, navigational bronchoscopy)

  5. Need for repeat EBUS or another procedure

    Time frame: Within 30 days of procedure

    Need for repeat EBUS or another procedure due to non-diagnostic or insufficient sample during a 30-day follow up period (binary value: yes/no)

  6. Procedure time

    Time frame: During Procedure

    Procedure time (measured in minutes)

  7. Number of Procedural complications

    Time frame: Within 7 days of the procedure

    Procedural complications observed during a one-week follow up period

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Other

Collaborators

  • AstraZeneca

Registry information

Official study title

Rapid Onsite Cytopathologic Evaluation for Improved Molecular Marker Testing Via Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: ROSE/NoROSE

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 30, 2021
Registry last updated
Dec 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.