Sacituzumab tirumotecan
BiologicalIV infusion
Other names: SKB264, MK-2870
NCT Number: NCT06170788
The primary objective of the study is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan combined with pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone with respect to overall survival (OS). The primary hypothesis is that the combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan and pembrolizumab is superior to pembrolizumab alone with respect to OS.
All participants who have completed the first course of pembrolizumab may be eligible for up to an additional 9 cycles of pembrolizumab monotherapy if there is blinded independent central review (BICR)-verified progressive disease by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) after initial treatment.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Instituto Alexander Fleming ( Site 0306), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
IV infusion
Other names: SKB264, MK-2870
IV infusion
Other names: MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®, SCH 900475
Participants are allowed to take supportive care measures at the discretion of the investigator. Prophylactic supportive care measures may include but are not limited to antiemetic agents, antidiarrheal agents, granulocyte and erythroid growth factors, and blood transfusions
Time frame: Up to approximately 49 months
OS is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: Up to approximately 49 months
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first
Time frame: Up to approximately 49 months
The OR is defined as a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR.
Time frame: Up to approximately 49 months
For participants who demonstrate confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR, duration of response is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 77 months
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 will be presented. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 77 months
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 77 months
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C13 Item 31 will be presented. The EORTC QLQ-C13 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 77 months
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer-specific supplemental questionnaire used in combination with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Participant responses to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The change from baseline in chest pain (EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40) score will be presented. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months
The TTD in GHS/QOL score (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30) will be presented. Participant responses to Items 29 and 30 ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). A higher score indicates a better overall outcome. TTD as assessed based on a negative change (decrease in score) from Baseline in GHS/QOL score. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months
The TTD in Dyspnea score (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8) will be presented. Participant response to the question "Were you short of breath?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of dyspnea. TTD is assessed based on the time to a negative change (increase in score) from baseline. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months
The TTD in Cough score (EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31) will be presented. Participant response to the question "Have you coughed?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates more frequent coughing. TTD is assessed based on the time to a negative change (increase in score) from baseline. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months
The TTD in Chest Pain score (EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40) will be presented. Participant response to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" is scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). A higher score indicates a worse level of chest pain. TTD is assessed based on the time to a negative change (increase in score) from baseline. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The percentage of participants who experience an AE will be presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months
The percentage of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be presented.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of MK-2870 in Combination With Pembrolizumab Compared to Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in the First-line Treatment of Participants With Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 TPS Greater Than or Equal to 50% (TroFuse-007)
Acronym: TroFuse-007
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02403193
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05920356
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Santa Barbara, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06694454
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07660055
Bladder Cancer, Breast Cancer
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial Details