UAMS Center on Aging
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
NCT Number: NCT05197140
Several of the investigator's recent studies have shown that all dietary proteins are not equal when it comes to making proteins in human bodies. Generally, foods made from animal muscle tissue are much more efficient at making new proteins in the body that those from plant sources. This study will measure the amount of protein growth in participants after consuming either one beef patty, one vegi-burger, or two vegi-burgers. By using stable isotope infusions and collecting blood and leg muscle samples, the investigator's lab can determine the rate of muscle metabolism that happens after a participant eats a protein-containing food. The investigator wants to determine if the vegi-burger is as efficient as the beef patty at creating proteins in a participants. The investigator will measure this metabolism over a 10-hour period, with the food being eaten at the 4 hour mark. The investigator plans to perform this procedure on up to 8 participants per food option (24 total).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
According to the USDA Economic Research Service Food Availability Data, beef consumption has been on a general decline for the past 40 years, with current per capita consumption approximately 35% lower in 2020 than in 1980. Some of this decline over the past few years can be attributed to politically motivated claims that carbon emissions from cattle represent a major threat to the global environment. However, the major reason for declining beef consumption is the widely promulgated claim that beef is unhealthy. The hamburger in particular has become a poster child for the notion that beef consumption is responsible for the increasing occurrence of obesity in the United States. The trend of decreasing beef consumption due to perceived health concerns, particularly obesity and associated health problems, has led major fast-food chains such as Burger King and McDonalds, to offer vegetarian burgers as healthy alternatives to the traditional beef burger. However, examination of the components of the macronutrient matrix of a typical vegetarian burger gives reason to question the health benefits as compared to a traditional beef patty-hamburger.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
see arm description
Other names: hamburger
see arm description
Other names: Impossible Burger (R)
Time frame: 6 hours after consumption of intervention
Free leucine, isoleucine, valine, histidine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan (combined) (µmol·L^(-1)·min). Following time points (in minutes) post-ingestion will be used to calculate the incremental area under the curve: 60, 90, 120, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330, 360.
University of Arkansas
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00497380
Protein Metabolism
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03142737
Protein Metabolism
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04821557
Protein Metabolism
Urbana, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03037294
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Protein Metabolism
Maastricht, Netherlands
View Trial Details