Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07631975

ROLE OF DUAL-TASK COST IN PREDICTING FALL RISK AMONG OLDER ADULTS RECEIVING INSTITUTIONAL CARE

There is a need for studies that examine the role of dual-task cost in predicting fall risk among older adults receiving institutional care and that develop classification models that can be used in clinical practice. The planned study aims to determine the discriminative ability of dual-task cost in identifying fall risk and to establish clinically meaningful cutoff values. In this respect, the study will both contribute to a more sensitive assessment of fall risk and provide a scientific basis for a low-cost, practical, and applicable screening approach.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Older Adults (65 Years and Older) Dual Task Cost Falls in Old Age INSTITUTIONAL CARE

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY, Samsun, Atakum 55270

Samsun, 55270, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location contact

MİNE PEKESEN P KURTÇA, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+903623121919

About this study

Changes in motor and cognitive functions that occur with the aging process negatively affect individuals' mobility and balance performance, there by increasing the risk of falls. Today, it is widely accepted that gait and postural control are not merely motor processes, but also require the active participation of attention and executive cognitive processes. In this context, the dual-task approach-wherein an individual simultaneously performs a second cognitive or motor task during gait-has become a widely utilized method for evaluating cognitive-motor interaction in older adults (Muir-Hunter & Wittwer, 2016). Performance degradation under dual-task conditions is explained by the individual having to allocate limited cognitive resources between two tasks, a phenomenon that becomes particularly more pronounced in older adults. Studies in the literature examining the relationship between dual-task performance and falls demonstrate that performance changes occurring under dual-task conditions are more strongly associated with falls compared to single-task conditions (Muir-Hunter & Wittwer, 2016). However, there is still no full consensus on which protocol, which secondary task, and which performance outcome are clinically most meaningful in dual-task assessments. The dual-task Timed Up and Go (TUG) test stands out as a practical and clinically applicable method for evaluating functional mobility. Tang et al. (2014) showed that motor dual-task TUG performance was superior to single-task TUG in discriminating the state of prefrailty in middle-aged and older adults. In the same study, it was reported that the ROC analysis of dual-task TUG performance showed significant discriminative power, and slow performance significantly increased the likelihood of prefrailty. These findings reveal that dual-task-based measurements are not only explanatory but also possess the potential to serve as classification tools and contribute to clinical decision-making processes. The relationship between cognitive functions and dual-task performance is another notable topic in the literature. It has been shown that both gait performance and cognitive performance deteriorate more markedly under dual-task conditions in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (Muir-Hunter & Wittwer, 2016). Furthermore, it is indicated that the type and difficulty level of the secondary task used have significant effects on dual-task performance. This situation highlights the critical importance of standardizing dual-task assessments. Fear of falling is also a major factor affecting functional performance in older adults. In a study conducted by Sapmaz et al. (2021) on institutionalized older adults, it was shown that individuals with a fear of falling had worse single-task and dual-task TUG performances; additionally, their balance and mobility levels were also lower. These findings demonstrate that the fear of falling is not merely a psychological condition but is closely related to functional capacity. However, a large part of current studies remains at the group-comparison level, and analyses modeling the role of dual-task performance in predicting clinical fall risk remain limited. Recent studies show that dual-task assessments are highly sensitive in uncovering hidden functional impairments in older adults (Falbo et al., 2016). Especially in frail populations such as institutionalized older adults, dual-task performance is thought to be closely associated with falls. However, most of these studies either feature intervention-based designs or are limited strictly to correlation analyses. A prominent gap in the literature is the scarcity of studies evaluating fall risk via dual-task cost (which represents the relative change compared to single-task performance) rather than absolute measurements of dual-task performance. Because dual-task cost reflects the relative deterioration in an individual's performance under cognitive load, it may serve as a clinically more meaningful indicator. Nevertheless, studies examining the role of dual-task cost in discriminating fall risk and establishing a cross-sectional classification model based on this variable remain highly limited.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being 65 years of age or older
  • Residing in a nursing home or care institution for at least 1 month
  • Ability to walk a distance of at least 10 meters
  • Ability to ambulate independently with an assistive device (e.g., cane, walker), if needed
  • Having a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of 18 or above
  • Ability to understand and execute single- and two-step verbal commands
  • Voluntary agreement to participate in the study and providing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • History of stroke or major orthopedic surgery within the past 6 monthsPresence of Parkinson's disease Stage ≥3 (Hoehn & Yahr) or any other neurological condition significantly affecting gait
  • Having a MoCA score below 18
  • History of fracture within the past 3 months
  • Presence of severe pain affecting gait during test administration (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] ≥ 7)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (≥ 180/100 mmHg) or unstable cardiovascular status
  • Active vestibular disease or a history of syncope within the past 3 months
  • Visual or hearing impairment severe enough to impede test execution
  • Inability to walk/ambulate without the physical assistance of another person

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Information Form

    Time frame: Single assessment (baseline)

    The following participant information will be recorded using a clinical information form developed by the researcher:

    Age (years)

    Sex (male/female)

    Educational status(illitirate/primare education/secondary education/high school or higher)

    Length of institutional stay( months and years)

    Height(cm)

    Weight(kg)

    Body mass index BMI (kg/m²)

    Number of chronic diseases and comorbidities

    Number of daily medications

    Use of assistive devices

  2. Fall Assesment

    Time frame: Single assessment (baseline)

    Fall history (Tripping, Slipping, Loss of Balance, Transposition)

    Fall History Questionnaire

    A fall will be defined as an event which results in an individual coming to rest inadvertently on the ground, floor, or a lower level. In this context, the following information will be recorded:

    Presence of a fall within the last 12 months (yes/no)

    Total number of falls within the last 12 months

    Presence of a fall within the last month (yes/no)

    Primary cause of the last fall

    Location of the last fall

    Injury status resulting from the last fall

  3. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Time frame: Single assessment (baseline)

    This assessment will be utilized to determine whether participants possess the cognitive competence to understand and execute the study protocol. Individuals with a MoCA score below 18 will be excluded from the study.

  4. Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

    Time frame: Single assessment (baseline)

    This test will be utilized to assess the functional mobility of the participants. The participant will be instructed to rise from a standard-height chair, walk a distance of 3 meters, turn around, return to the chair, and sit back down. The duration of the test will be recorded in seconds.

  5. Dual-task Timed Up and Go Test (TUG-DT)

    Time frame: Single assessment (baseline)

    This test will be administered to evaluate the dual-task performance of the participants. Participants will be instructed to simultaneously perform a cognitive task during the TUG test.

    Cognitive Task Animal naming will be utilized as the cognitive task under the dual-task condition. The participant will be asked to name as many animals as possible while walking. All participants will be assigned the same task, and standard verbal instructions will be utilized.

  6. Dual-Task Cost (DTC)

    Time frame: Single assessment (baseline)

    The dual-task cost will be calculated using the single-task TUG and dual-task TUG durations according to the following formula: DTC (%)"=(TUG_DT-TUG)/TUG×100 An increase in the DTC percentage will indicate greater performance degradation under the dual-task condition.

  7. Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)

    Time frame: Single assessment (baseline)

    This assessment will be utilized to evaluate the balance and gait performance of the participants. The total Tinetti score will be used to determine the risk of falls.

    Operational Definition of Fall Risk

    Fall risk will be operationalized in two ways in the study:

    As a continuous variable: Total Tinetti score

    As a binary classification variable: Risk group based on the Tinetti score

    Classification based on the Tinetti score will be structured as follows:

    Low fall risk: 25-28 points

    Increased fall risk: 24 points and below

    This binary classification will be utilized for the classification model and ROC analysis.

  8. Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)

    Time frame: Single assessment (baseline)

    This scale will be utilized to assess the participants' level of fear of falling as a descriptive and secondary variable. The FES-I score will not serve as a primary variable in the main model; however, it will be reported in descriptive analyses and secondary analyses as required.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mine PEKESEN KURTÇA, ASISTANT PROFESSOR, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+903623121919

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ondokuz Mayıs University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

ROLE OF DUAL-TASK COST IN PREDICTING FALL RISK IN OLDER ADULTS RECEIVING INSTITUTIONAL CARE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MODEL

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 8, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.