Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01185626

ROGYcare: The Impact of a Cancer Survivorship Care Plan on Patient Reported Outcomes and Health Care Providers

Earlier diagnoses and improved treatments have contributed to the growing cohort of cancer survivors. Nevertheless, these patients remain at risk for adverse long-term or late physical or psychosocial effects of cancer and its treatment. There is increasing recognition to improve information disclosure and cancer survivorship care. The American Institute of Medicine (IOM) and Health Council of the Netherlands both recommend that cancer survivors receive a summary of their course of treatment as a formal document, that also includes recommendations for subsequent cancer surveillance, management of late effects, and strategies for health promotion, the Survivorship Care Plan (SCP). However, no evidence exists concerning the positive and negative effects of the implementation of the SCP in daily clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of SCP care in routine clinical practice on cancer survivors' satisfaction with information disclosure and care, quality of life, illness perception, and health care use.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women who are newly diagnosed with endometrial or ovarian cancer in one of the 12 participating hospitals.
  • The patients have to be able to complete a Dutch questionnaire.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are not able to read or write Dutch will be excluded, as they are not able to complete a Dutch questionnaire.

Treatment and study plan

SCP care

Other

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients' score on the EORTC-INFO26 module15 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with information provision´, right after initial treatment

    Time frame: Right after initial treatment (t0)

    Evaluating satisfaction with information on different areas of the disease, diagnosis, treatment and care. It contains the following scales: (a) Information about the disease; (b) Information about medical tests; (c) Information about treatment; (d) Information on other services, and single items: (a) Written information; (b) Information on CDs or tape/video; (c) Satisfaction with the amount of information; (d) Desire for more information; (e) Desire for less information; (f) Helpfulness of information.

  2. Patients' score on the EORTC QLQ-C3017 questionnaire, measuring ´Health related quality of life (HRQL)´, right after initial treatment

    Time frame: Right after initial treatment (t0)

    Measuring cancer specific HRQL, including scales assessing physical, role, cognitive and emotional functioning, fatigue and sleep problems, and overall health and quality of life.This core instrument is supplemented by a condition-specific questionnaire module (for ovarian cancer: EORTC-OV module18, for endometrial cancer: EORTC-EN module).

  3. Patients' score on the EORTC IN-PATSAT3216 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with care´, right after initial treatment

    Time frame: Right after initial treatment (t0)

    Assessing patients' perception of quality of medical care, nursing care and care organization and hospital services . It contains 11 multi-item and 3 single-item scales, including doctors' and nurses' skills, information provision, and availability.

  4. Patients' score on the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ)21, measuring ´Illness perception´, right after initial treatment

    Time frame: Right after initial treatment (t0)

    The scale has 9 items, measuring (a) cognitive representations (consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, identity); (b) emotional representations (concern, emotion); (c) illness comprehensibility; and (d) an open-ended response item on the 3 most important causal factors of illness.

  5. Patients' score on the EORTC-INFO26 module15 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with information provision´, 6 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 6 months after initial treatment (t1)

    Evaluating satisfaction with information on different areas of the disease, diagnosis, treatment and care. It contains the following scales: (a) Information about the disease; (b) Information about medical tests; (c) Information about treatment; (d) Information on other services, and single items: (a) Written information; (b) Information on CDs or tape/video; (c) Satisfaction with the amount of information; (d) Desire for more information; (e) Desire for less information; (f) Helpfulness of information.

  6. Patients' score on the EORTC QLQ-C3017 questionnaire, measuring ´Health related quality of life (HRQL)´, 6 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 6 months after initial treatment (t1)

    Measuring cancer specific HRQL, including scales assessing physical, role, cognitive and emotional functioning, fatigue and sleep problems, and overall health and quality of life.This core instrument is supplemented by a condition-specific questionnaire module (for ovarian cancer: EORTC-OV module18, for endometrial cancer: EORTC-EN module).

  7. Patients' score on the EORTC IN-PATSAT3216 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with care´, 6 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 6 months after initial treatment (t1)

    Assessing patients' perception of quality of medical care, nursing care and care organization and hospital services . It contains 11 multi-item and 3 single-item scales, including doctors' and nurses' skills, information provision, and availability.

  8. Patients' score on the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ)21, measuring ´Illness perception´, 6 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 6 months after initial treatment (t1)

    The scale has 9 items, measuring (a) cognitive representations (consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, identity); (b) emotional representations (concern, emotion); (c) illness comprehensibility; and (d) an open-ended response item on the 3 most important causal factors of illness.

  9. Patients' score on the EORTC-INFO26 module15 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with information provision´, 12 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 12 months after initial treatment (t2)

    Evaluating satisfaction with information on different areas of the disease, diagnosis, treatment and care. It contains the following scales: (a) Information about the disease; (b) Information about medical tests; (c) Information about treatment; (d) Information on other services, and single items: (a) Written information; (b) Information on CDs or tape/video; (c) Satisfaction with the amount of information; (d) Desire for more information; (e) Desire for less information; (f) Helpfulness of information.

  10. Patients' score on the EORTC QLQ-C3017 questionnaire, measuring ´Health related quality of life (HRQL)´, 12 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 12 months after initial treatment (t2)

    Measuring cancer specific HRQL, including scales assessing physical, role, cognitive and emotional functioning, fatigue and sleep problems, and overall health and quality of life.This core instrument is supplemented by a condition-specific questionnaire module (for ovarian cancer: EORTC-OV module18, for endometrial cancer: EORTC-EN module).

  11. Patients' score on the EORTC IN-PATSAT3216 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with care´, 12 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 12 months after initial treatment (t2)

    Assessing patients' perception of quality of medical care, nursing care and care organization and hospital services . It contains 11 multi-item and 3 single-item scales, including doctors' and nurses' skills, information provision, and availability.

  12. Patients' score on the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ)21, measuring ´Illness perception´, 12 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 12 months after initial treatment (t2)

    The scale has 9 items, measuring (a) cognitive representations (consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, identity); (b) emotional representations (concern, emotion); (c) illness comprehensibility; and (d) an open-ended response item on the 3 most important causal factors of illness.

  13. Patients' score on the EORTC-INFO26 module15 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with information provision´, 18 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 18 months after initial treatment (t3)

    Evaluating satisfaction with information on different areas of the disease, diagnosis, treatment and care. It contains the following scales: (a) Information about the disease; (b) Information about medical tests; (c) Information about treatment; (d) Information on other services, and single items: (a) Written information; (b) Information on CDs or tape/video; (c) Satisfaction with the amount of information; (d) Desire for more information; (e) Desire for less information; (f) Helpfulness of information.

  14. Patients' score on the EORTC QLQ-C3017 questionnaire, measuring ´Health related quality of life (HRQL)´, 18 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 18 months after initial treatment (t3)

    Measuring cancer specific HRQL, including scales assessing physical, role, cognitive and emotional functioning, fatigue and sleep problems, and overall health and quality of life.This core instrument is supplemented by a condition-specific questionnaire module (for ovarian cancer: EORTC-OV module18, for endometrial cancer: EORTC-EN module).

  15. Patients' score on the EORTC IN-PATSAT3216 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with care´, 18 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 18 months after initial treatment (t3)

    Assessing patients' perception of quality of medical care, nursing care and care organization and hospital services . It contains 11 multi-item and 3 single-item scales, including doctors' and nurses' skills, information provision, and availability.

  16. Patients' score on the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ)21, measuring ´Illness perception´, 18 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 18 months after initial treatment (t3)

    The scale has 9 items, measuring (a) cognitive representations (consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, identity); (b) emotional representations (concern, emotion); (c) illness comprehensibility; and (d) an open-ended response item on the 3 most important causal factors of illness.

  17. Patients' score on the EORTC-INFO26 module15 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with information provision´, 24 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 24 months after initial treatment (t4)

    Evaluating satisfaction with information on different areas of the disease, diagnosis, treatment and care. It contains the following scales: (a) Information about the disease; (b) Information about medical tests; (c) Information about treatment; (d) Information on other services, and single items: (a) Written information; (b) Information on CDs or tape/video; (c) Satisfaction with the amount of information; (d) Desire for more information; (e) Desire for less information; (f) Helpfulness of information.

  18. Patients' score on the EORTC QLQ-C3017 questionnaire, measuring ´Health related quality of life (HRQL)´, 24 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 24 months after initial treatment (t4)

    Measuring cancer specific HRQL, including scales assessing physical, role, cognitive and emotional functioning, fatigue and sleep problems, and overall health and quality of life.This core instrument is supplemented by a condition-specific questionnaire module (for ovarian cancer: EORTC-OV module18, for endometrial cancer: EORTC-EN module).

  19. Patients' score on the EORTC IN-PATSAT3216 questionnaire, measuring ´Satisfaction with care´, 24 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 24 months after initial treatment (t4)

    Assessing patients' perception of quality of medical care, nursing care and care organization and hospital services . It contains 11 multi-item and 3 single-item scales, including doctors' and nurses' skills, information provision, and availability.

  20. Patients' score on the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ)21, measuring ´Illness perception´, 24 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 24 months after initial treatment (t4)

    The scale has 9 items, measuring (a) cognitive representations (consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, identity); (b) emotional representations (concern, emotion); (c) illness comprehensibility; and (d) an open-ended response item on the 3 most important causal factors of illness.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients' frequency and reason (cancer-related or not) for contact with their general practitioner or medical specialist in the past 12 months, measuring 'Patients' health care use', right after initial treatment

    Time frame: Right after initial treatment (t0)

    Patients will also be asked whether they have been referred to other health care services.

  2. Health care providers' score on a questionnaire assessing their evaluation of the (implementation of the) SCP

    Time frame: At the start of the study (t0)

    The questionnaire will contain questions regarding how much time the health care providers in general expect to spend on SCP care, and what problems they expect to encounter in daily practice.

  3. Health care providers' score on a questionnaire assessing their evaluation of the (implementation of the) SCP

    Time frame: At the end of the study (t5)

    The questionnaire will contain questions regarding how much time the health care providers spent on SCP care, and what problems they encountered in daily practice.

  4. Patients' frequency and reason (cancer-related or not) for contact with their general practitioner or medical specialist in the past 12 months, measuring 'Patients' health care use', 6 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 6 months after initial treatment (t1)

    Patients will also be asked whether they have been referred to other health care services.

  5. Patients' frequency and reason (cancer-related or not) for contact with their general practitioner or medical specialist in the past 12 months, measuring 'Patients' health care use', 12 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 12 months after initial treatment (t2)

    Patients will also be asked whether they have been referred to other health care services.

  6. Patients' frequency and reason (cancer-related or not) for contact with their general practitioner or medical specialist in the past 12 months, measuring 'Patients' health care use', 18 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 18 months after initial treatment (t3)

    Patients will also be asked whether they have been referred to other health care services.

  7. Patients' frequency and reason (cancer-related or not) for contact with their general practitioner or medical specialist in the past 12 months, measuring 'Patients' health care use', 24 months after initial treatment

    Time frame: 24 months after initial treatment (t4)

    Patients will also be asked whether they have been referred to other health care services.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Lonneke van de Poll-Franse

Other

Collaborators

  • Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands
  • Dutch Cancer Society

Registry information

Official study title

ROGYcare: The Impact of a Cancer Survivorship Care Plan on Patient Reported Outcomes and Health Care Providers. A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: ROGYcare

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Aug 20, 2010
Registry last updated
May 9, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.