Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07343622

Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for TCA

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA) is the most severe form of Hirschsprung disease and is commonly managed with neonatal enterostomy followed by delayed definitive pull-through. Despite widespread use, the optimal reconstructive procedure for TCA remains uncertain. The Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through procedures are the two most frequently adopted techniques, each with distinct theoretical advantages and limitations regarding bowel function, enterocolitis risk, and anorectal physiology. With the increasing application of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery, both procedures have been further refined; however, robust comparative evidence, particularly for total colonic disease, is lacking. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed comparison of postoperative functional outcomes and Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures. This multicenter study compares robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA after neonatal enterostomy, focusing on postoperative bowel function and enterocolitis incidence.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

1 month–14 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA), also referred to as total colonic aganglionosis, represents the most severe phenotype of Hirschsprung disease and remains a major surgical challenge. Owing to extensive aganglionosis, poor nutritional status, and high risk of enterocolitis in the neonatal period, the current standard of care in most centers consists of neonatal enterostomy followed by a delayed definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure. Despite advances in minimally invasive techniques, the optimal reconstructive strategy for TCA has not been established.

Among available options, the Duhamel procedure and the modified Soave pull-through are the two most commonly adopted techniques. The Duhamel approach, particularly when combined with a transanal external transection, preserves a retrorectal colonic reservoir, which may reduce anastomotic tension and theoretically improve postoperative bowel function. However, concerns remain regarding fecal stasis, residual spur formation, and the potential risk of postoperative enterocolitis. In contrast, the modified Soave procedure achieves complete endorectal pull-through and eliminates the aganglionic rectal segment, but it may be associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic stricture, cuff-related obstruction, and impaired anorectal motility, especially in patients with extensive disease such as TCA.

With the increasing adoption of robot-assisted and laparoscopic techniques, both procedures have been refined; nevertheless, direct comparative data evaluating functional outcomes, Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis, and perioperative parameters between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures-particularly in total colonic disease-remain scarce. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed, standardized comparison of these two surgical strategies in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA.

Therefore, this multicenter study aims to compare robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with total colonic Hirschsprung disease who underwent neonatal enterostomy, with a primary focus on postoperative bowel function and the incidence of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Definitive diagnosis of total colonic Hirschsprung disease confirmed by pathology from biopsy at neonatal enterostomy, consistent with total colonic aganglionosis.
  • Two-stage surgical strategy: neonatal enterostomy performed first, followed by definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure.
  • Planned definitive reconstruction by one of the following techniques:
  • Robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel, orModified Soave pull-through (minimally invasive abdominal phase allowed).
  • Availability for follow-up assessments and outcomes collection per protocol.

Exclusion criteria

  • Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome).
  • Definitive surgery performed by open laparotomy approach or Swenson procedure.
  • One-stage primary pull-through without neonatal enterostomy (single-stage definitive management).

Treatment and study plan

Transanal Transection Duhamel operation

Procedure

The modified Duhamel procedure was performed using a transanal external rectal transection technique. Following mobilization of the ganglionated colon, the distal rectum was transected externally through the anal canal, expanding pelvic operative space and improving exposure compared with conventional pelvic transection. A retrorectal channel was created, and the colon was pulled through posterior to the native rectum. Residual rectal septum (spur) was eliminated using a transanal external compression technique, enabling a wide side-to-side colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The anterior rectal wall was preserved, maintaining rectal sensory structures and avoiding circumferential endorectal dissection as used in Soave procedures. This approach was intended to optimize anastomotic configuration and postoperative bowel function.

Modified Soave Pull-Through

Procedure

The modified Soave procedure was performed as a definitive pull-through following neonatal enterostomy. At approximately 1 year of age or older, patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy using a robotic-assisted or laparoscopic approach. The entire aganglionic colon was resected, and an endorectal pull-through was performed. The terminal ileum was delivered through the rectal cuff and anastomosed to the anal canal to restore intestinal continuity. This technique eliminates the aganglionic colorectal segment and avoids creation of a retrorectal pouch. Perioperative management and postoperative care were standardized across participating centers according to the study protocol.

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative bowel function

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

    Defecation function will be evaluated using the Rintala scoring, which comprises seven domains: bowel control, awareness of the urge to defecate, defecation frequency, stool consistency, fecal soiling, constipation, and social functioning. A total score of 17-20 points is classified as excellent, 12-16 points as good, 9-11 points as fair, and ≤8 points as poor.24 months after definitive pull-through .

  2. Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) incidence

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

    HAEC diagnosed using a standardized criterion ( prespecified clinical criteria) and recorded as:

    cumulative incidence, number of episodes, episodes requiring hospitalization/IV antibiotics.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operative time

    Time frame: During surgery

    During definitive pull-through operation

  2. Intraoperative blood loss (ml)

    Time frame: During surgery

  3. Postoperative length of stay (days)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

  4. postoperative complications

    Time frame: within 30 days and within 12 months

    Overall postoperative complications within 30 days and within 12 months:

    anastomotic stricture, postoperative bleeding, perianal dermatitis, other prespecified surgical complications (ileus, pelvic abscess, reoperation)

  5. Number of anal dilatations

    Time frame: within 6 and 12 months

    Number of anal dilatations required (count) within 6 and 12 months

  6. Anal resting pressure

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

    Anal resting pressure measured by anorectal manometry (mmHg) at a standardized postoperative time point (6 months, 12 months and 24 months).

  7. Dehydration episodes

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

    Dehydration episodes (count) requiring medical intervention within 24 months.

  8. Hospital readmissions

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

    Hospital readmissions (count) within 24 months.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

zebing zheng, M.D

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86-19985120815

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zunyi Medical College

Other

Collaborators

  • Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital
  • Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
  • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Registry information

Official study title

Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for Total Colonic Hirschsprung Disease: A Multicenter Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 15, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.