Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03239301

Robotic-assisted Upper Extremity Training in Spinal Cord Injury Patients

Study design: Controlled Trial Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted training of forearm and hand functions in spinal cord injury patients Setting: Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Turkey Methods: Forty patients were allocated into robotic and control groups. Both groups received conventional rehabilitation program for four weeks. Moreover, robotic group received robotic rehabilitation program tailored to the patient five times a week (each session of 30 min).

Baseline data and post-intervention data was compared.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ankara Fizik Tedavi ve REhabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages between 18-50
  • Cervical Level of Spinal Cord Injury

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe upper extremity contractures in the joints
  • Intensive spasticity (Ashworth 3-4)
  • Shoulder pain that causes exercise intolerance

Treatment and study plan

conventional rehabilitation

Procedure

Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated. Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.

Robotic REhabilitation

Procedure

The Armeo Spring HocomAG Inc. (Volketswil, Switzerland) device was used in robot assisted upper limb rehabilitation program. Assistive component of the robotic arm was adjusted in accordance with motor level of each patient. Variety and difficulty of games were chosen according to the ability and functional status of the patients. Variety and difficulty level of the games were modified according to progress of patients by the same physiotherapist.

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Independence Measure

    Time frame: Four weeks

    Scale Evaluating the Functionality

  2. Spinal Cord Independence Measure III

    Time frame: Four weeks

    Scale Evaluating the Functionality and independence

  3. Short Form-36

    Time frame: Four weeks

    Scale Evaluation the activities of daily living

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Aug 4, 2017
Registry last updated
Aug 4, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.