University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 981095, United States
NCT Number: NCT03184792
Stimulation of the spinal cord may induce the growth and reorganization of neural pathways leading to the re-animation of paralyzed limbs. Growing evidence indicates that electrical spinal cord stimulation improves motor functions immediately via modulating the excitability of spinal circuitry in patients with spinal cord injury. Recently, a novel, non-invasive, well-tolerated and painless transcutaneous electrical stimulation strategy was demonstrated to be effective for improving lower limb motor function in healthy individuals and in patients with spinal cord injury. The investigators hypothesize that transcutaneous cervical electrical stimulation can enhance conscious motor control and functions of hand and arm via neuromodulation of spinal network.
This study is a prospective efficacy trial of transcutaneous cervical electrical stimulation for improving upper limb function in patients with traumatic or degenerative cervical spinal cord injury. Transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulation device is not regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration for treatment of spinal cord injury.
The interventions include either transcutaneous cervical spinal electrical stimulation combined with physical therapy or physical therapy only. The order of the interventions will be randomized for each subject in a delayed cross-over design. Total duration of the study is 6 months, including 4 weeks baseline measurements, 8 weeks intervention and 12 weeks follow-up. Both immediate and lasting improvements in hand motor and sensory function via transcutaneous cervical spinal stimulation will be evaluated.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 981095, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Non-invasive electrical stimulation of cervical spinal cord over the skin
Physical therapy to improve arm and hand functions
Other names: Exercise therapy
Time frame: 6 months
GRASSP is a clinical impairment measurement tool that quantifies hand impairment caused by cervical spinal cord injury. The tool measures three domains of function: strength (manual muscle strength testing), sensibility (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament sensation test), and prehension (ability and performance to generate various grasp and pinch movements using a water bottle, jar, key, pegs, coins, and nuts).
The total score is calculated as the sum of the subscale scores. The minimum score is zero, and the maximum score is 232 points. Higher Scores mean a better outcome.
Score change before and after each intervention is calculated.
Time frame: 6 months
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) Examination Subscale 1: Myotomal-based Motor Examination - measures the motor function of the extremities. The minimum score is zero, and the maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Subscale 2: The Dermatomal-based Sensory Examination - measures the sensory function of the whole body dermatomes. The minimum score is zero, and the maximum score is 224. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Time frame: 6 months
Hand strength measurement by dynamometry.
The change in strength (improvement) before and at the end of each intervention arm is calculated.
Time frame: 6 months
Patient reported pain rating on a 0 to 10 scale. The mean score change (improvement) before and at the end of each intervention arm is calculated.
Zero means no pain, 10 means the worst pain one can imagine. Higher scores mean worse pain.
Time frame: 6 months
Patient-reported spasm rating. Scores are mild (0), moderate (1), and severe (2).
Time frame: 6 months
Clinician-administered disability questionnaire for patients with spinal cord lesions.
The total SCIM scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcomes. Score change (improvement) relative to baseline or previous intervention arm is calculated.
Time frame: 6 months
Patient-reported quality of life scale. A higher score indicates a higher quality of life. Score change (improvement) relative to baseline or prior intervention arm is calculated.
University of Washington
Other
Activity Dependent Rehabilitation Via Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation to Restore Upper Extremity Functions in Spinal Cord Injury
Acronym: ADDRESS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06907381
Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07062796
Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06159946
Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05462925
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details