No. 150 Ximen Road
Linhai, Zhejiang, 317000, China
NCT Number: NCT07639619
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted minimally invasive treatment versus conventional surgery in elderly patients with FFP3-4 fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eligible patients will be stratified according to FFP classification and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either robot assisted minimally invasive fixation or conventional surgical treatment. Primary and secondary outcomes include pain relief, early mobilization, functional recovery, perioperative complications, venous thromboembolism events, laboratory parameters, imaging outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization. The study aims to provide evidence for optimizing surgical treatment strategies in elderly patients with unstable pelvic fragility fractures.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified60 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Linhai, Zhejiang, 317000, China
This study is a prospective, single center, stratified randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted minimally invasive treatment versus conventional surgery in elderly patients with FFP3-4 fragility fractures of the pelvis.
A total of 88 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the robot assisted minimally invasive treatment group or the conventional surgery group. Randomization will be stratified according to FFP classification (FFP3 or FFP4) using a computer generated randomization sequence.
Eligible participants include patients aged 60 years or older diagnosed with osteoporosis related FFP3 or FFP4 pelvic fragility fractures caused by low energy trauma. The primary objective is to compare perioperative outcomes, pain control, early mobilization, functional recovery, imaging outcomes, venous thromboembolism events, laboratory parameters, complications, opioid consumption, and healthcare resource utilization between treatment strategies.
Patients in the robot assisted treatment group will undergo robot assisted minimally invasive pelvic fixation using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement. Patients in the conventional surgery group will undergo standard open surgical fixation according to fracture characteristics and surgeon judgment.
Outcome measures include pain scores, Majeed pelvic function score, EQ 5D, SMFA, imaging evaluation of fracture healing, venous thromboembolism events, laboratory parameters, muscle mass changes, bone mineral density, opioid consumption, perioperative indicators, complications, and healthcare costs. Follow up assessments will be performed at postoperative day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.
The results of this study may provide evidence regarding the optimal surgical treatment strategy for elderly patients with unstable pelvic fragility fractures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Robot assisted minimally invasive fixation is performed using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement for stabilization of unstable pelvic fragility fractures.
Conventional open reduction and internal fixation for FFP3-4 pelvic fragility fractures performed without robotic assistance.
Time frame: At 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, day 1, day 2, day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain severity.
Time frame: At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
The Majeed Pelvic Function Score is used to evaluate functional recovery after pelvic fracture treatment. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functional outcomes and quality of life.
Time frame: At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
Health related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L). The EQ-5D index score ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health). Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.
Time frame: At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
Time frame: From treatment initiation to 1 year follow up
Time frame: Time Frame: Postoperative Days 0-3
Assessment of cumulative opioid consumption during hospitalization
Time frame: At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
Musculoskeletal function assessed using the 46-item Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Raw questionnaire scores are transformed to a standardized score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate worse musculoskeletal function and greater disability.
Time frame: Time Frame: Preoperative, Day 1, Day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
Time frame: Time Frame: Preoperative, Day 1, Day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment.
Time frame: perioperative
Duration of surgery measured in minutes.
Time frame: perioperative
Estimated intraoperative blood loss measured in milliliters.
Time frame: perioperative
Length of skin incision measured in centimeters.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Junbo Liang
Other
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Elderly Patients With FFP3-4 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07636616
Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP)
View Trial DetailsNCT06540339
Femoral Fractures, Fractures, Bone
View Trial DetailsNCT07351123
Femoral Fractures, Fractures, Bone
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07709247
Biomarkers, Bone Diseases
View Trial Details