UH Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
NCT Number: NCT04791696
Keratoplasty is one of the most common grafts and penetrating keratoplasty is still the technique most used in the world, ahead of lamellar grafts, and is estimated to represent 70% of the total.
Graft rejection is still the main cause of failure of this type of surgery, to the extent that nearly a third of all patients will in some way be affected by rejection in due course.
Numerous risk factors for rejection have been identified, whether related to the donor, the recipient, or the surgical procedure itself.
In addition, many of the studies performed have used univariate analysis only, and yet there is a strong case for multivariate analysis, given the wide range of factors that need to be examined.
This study seeks to analyze the rejection rates and the survival of penetrating keratoplasty for a group of patients from Montpellier Hospital (France).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–100 year
All sexes
Observational
Montpellier, 34295, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-keratoplasty performed in the ophthalmology department of the CHRU of Montpellier between 15/06/2005 and 18/09/2018
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 1 day
The main criterion studied is the fact that rejection had occurred, defined by the appearance of a rejection line, whether epithelial or endothelial (Khodadoust line), subepithelial infiltrates, or an anterior chamber inflammatory reaction (Tyndall effect, retro corneal precipitates and Descemet folds) with corneal edema in a previously clear graft. Opaque grafts with no clear period in the 2 weeks after grafting were not considered as rejections, but rather as straightforward graft failures.
Time frame: 1 day
The other criteria studied is irreversible graft rejection, defined as the persistence of a central corneal edema for 3 months despite treatment, and graft failure, defined as a second keratoplasty, or the persistence of a central corneal edema persisting for more than 3 months, whatever the cause (rejection, corneal endothelial cell failure, other).
University Hospital, Montpellier
Other
Risk Factors for Human Corneal Graft Failure : a Monocentric Retrospective Observational Cohort, Montpellier, South of France
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06101017
Corneal Disease, Corneal Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07693673
Cornea, Corneal Diseases
Sohag, Sohag Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT02987686
Corneal Diseases, Eye Diseases
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06636708
Corneal Diseases, Effectiveness of Microdrops
New York, United States
View Trial Details