FlareHawk Interbody Fusion System
DeviceExpandable lumbar intervertebral body fusion device
NCT Number: NCT04057235
This is a retrospective clinical study (chart review) of patients who have previously undergone Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion surgery with the FlareHawk expandable interbody fusion cage at one or two contiguous levels.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Chatham Orthopaedic Associates, Savannah, Georgia, United States
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone a Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) or Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) procedure with a FlareHawk expandable interbody fusion cage(s) to assess the device's performance and safety when used in accordance with its intended use. The primary hypothesis is that study subjects who received the FlareHawk expandable cage(s) through a TLIF or PLIF procedure experienced fusion by 12 months (+/- 3 mo) follow-up, with improvements in clinical outcomes related to pain and/or disability compared to pre-operative scores. Further, the subjects are hypothesized to have not experienced any unforeseen device- or procedure-related adverse events.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
To be a part of this study, the subject must:
Exclusion criteria
Subjects must not meet any of the following exclusion criteria to be included in the study:
Expandable lumbar intervertebral body fusion device
Time frame: 12 months +/- 3 months
Proportion of participants with radiographic arthrodesis at 12 months +/- 3 months as determined using plain radiographic images with assessment based on the Bridwell-Lenke grading system [Bridwell and Lenke et al, 1995].
Time frame: From baseline to last available follow-up, with an average follow-up of 4.6 ± 4.4 months (range: 0.5-20.5 mo)
Visual analog scale for measuring pain intensity related to leg pain. The scale is anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 10).
Time frame: From baseline to last available follow-up, with an average follow-up of 4.4 ± 4.3 months (range: 0.5-20.5 mo)
Visual analog scale for measuring pain intensity related to back pain. The scale is anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 10).
Time frame: From baseline to last available follow-up, with an average follow-up of 4.4 ± 3.8 months (range: 0.5-20.5 mo)
ODI is used to quantify disability related to lower back pain. The final score/index ranges from 0-100. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed-bound.
Integrity Implants Inc.
Industry
Transforaminal/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With the FlareHawk® Expandable Interbody Fusion Device: A Retrospective Chart Review Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06199999
Bone Diseases, Confusion
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04984629
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04416321
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Disc Disease
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00948532
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial Details