Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06199999

Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Local Infiltration Following Fusion Surgery

The proposed intervention will examine two alternative methods for postoperative pain control. Two treatment arms of this study will include subjects who receive an erector spinae block (ESP) after induction of anesthesia but prior to the start of surgery and subjects who will receive a high volume of local anesthetic infiltration at the end of the procedure before emergence from anesthesia. The control group of subjects will undergo spinal surgery with general anesthesia but without any regional anesthesia. Outcome measurements include evaluation of serum inflammatory markers, pain scores, opioid usage and standardized evidence-based assessment methodologies.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Treatment arms include:

  • Group ESP (Erector Spinae Plane). This group receives general anesthesia with ESP (Erector Spinae Block) regional pain block prior to incision.
  • Group LIA (Local Infiltration Anesthesia). This group receives general anesthesia and surgical procedure will take place as planned. Prior to being awakened, the area of procedure will be infiltrated using local anesthetic (LIA).
  • Group GA. This group receives general anesthesia (GA) only and surgical procedure will follow standard conditions.

Pre-procedure activities for all groups will include survey evaluations. If the surveys demonstrate pre-procedure cognitive deficits, the subject's participation will cease.

All subjects who do not display deficits will complete baseline evaluations that include social history, pain medication history and rate their pain (scored from 1 to 10). The subjects will be randomized to a treatment group. Once the subject is asleep and prior to incision, laboratory blood tests will be drawn and again approximately 24 hours after the subject is received into the recovery unit. Following their surgical procedure, pain control for all subjects will be at the discretion of their primary care team. However, as part of the study, the amount of opioid medications required to control their pain and their pain rating score for the first 72 hours post surgery will be collected from the subject's medical record unless discharged from the hospital before this cutoff time. On post-operative days when subject remains in the hospital facility, repeat survey evaluations will be carried out and during the first 7 days of the subject's hospital stay and unanticipated event will be recorded from the subject's medical record.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

for all groups:

  • Age: Greater than 18 years but less than 80
  • Surgical procedure: 1 to 2 level thoraco-lumbar fusion between T8 and S2; non-emergent surgery
  • Opioid naive (less than 6 oxycodone/day or 30 mg oxycodone equivalent)
  • No contraindication to local anesthetics or regional procedures.

Exclusion criteria

for all groups:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Allergy to study medications
  • BMI less than 20 or greater than 50
  • Major liver or kidney dysfunction or other pre-existing major organ dysfunction
  • Revision surgery
  • Opioid tolerant (60 mg morphine equivalents/day for 1 week) or narcotic dependence (opioid intake morphine equivalent greater than10 mg/day for more than 3 months)
  • Other sources of chronic pain (e.g. fibromyalgia)
  • Patients with associated significant central nervous system (CNS) or respiratory disease (home oxygen use)
  • Pre-operative neurological deficits
  • Co-existing hematological disorders or deranged coagulation parameters
  • Significant psychiatric illnesses that impedes the subject's ability to provide informed consent
  • Language barrier
  • Vulnerable population (e.g. prisoners)
  • Pregnant females
  • History of recent myocardial infarction
  • History of recent cardiac stent procedure (within 3 months)
  • Cardiac ejection fraction < 30%

Treatment and study plan

erector spinae block

Procedure

General anesthesia with Erector Spinae Plane Block

Local infiltration with local anesthetic

Procedure

General anesthesia with local infiltration of local anesthetic:

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) Scores Between Treatment Groups

    Time frame: Change from pre-operation score to 1 day after surgery date

    The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a patient reported assessment aimed to validate the patients recovery following surgical intervention. The subject is asked to provide a quantitative number to a series of questions. The answers are rated on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 = none of the time and 10 = all of the time. The scores for all of the questions are summed and comparison between the treatment groups will be assessed.

  2. Quantitate the Change in Delirium Symptoms; Pre- to post-operative day 1

    Time frame: Change from pre-operation score to 1 day after surgery date

    Potential new onset of delirium following surgical procedure will be assessed using the standardized 3D CAM ASSESSMENT (3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)). The subject is asked a series of questions and their responses are recorded. This structured mental status assessment is designed to detect the presence or absence of delirium. "The CAM algorithm is considered positive if the following features are present: Feature 1) Acute onset or fluctuating course and Feature 2) Inattention and either Feature 3) Disorganized thinking or Feature 4) Altered level of consciousness."

    Comparison between the treatment groups will be assessed and the presence of post-operative delirium reported.

    Reference: Marcantonio et al., (PMID: 25329203) and training manual.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quantitate the Change in Delirium Symptoms; Pre- to post-operative day 3

    Time frame: Change from pre-operation score to 3 days after surgery date

    Potential new onset of delirium following surgical procedure will be assessed using the standardized 3D CAM ASSESSMENT (3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)). The subject is asked a series of questions and their responses are recorded. This structured mental status assessment is designed to detect the presence or absence of delirium. "The CAM algorithm is considered positive if the following features are present: Feature 1) Acute onset or fluctuating course and Feature 2) Inattention and either Feature 3) Disorganized thinking or Feature 4) Altered level of consciousness."

    Comparison between the treatment groups will be assessed and the presence of post-operative delirium reported.

    Reference: Marcantonio et al., (PMID: 25329203) and training manual.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rashmi Mueller

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks Versus High Volume Local Infiltration Analgesia on Pain, Inflammation and Cognitive Outcomes Following Thoraco-Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 10, 2024
Registry last updated
Feb 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.