Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04378140

Retention and Durability of the Anterior Zirconia Wing Bridge

This study is a clinical trial to determine the retention and durability of the anterior zirconia wing bridge. The type of zirconia-wing bridge the investigators are researching in this study has two wings which generally have three countersunk holes (meaning that the circumference of the outer portion of the hole is larger than the inner part of the hole). Composite resin (dental filling material) is placed in the holes as well as under and around the wings.

Twelve patients will have bridges placed and be evaluated every 6 months (ideally) to determine if the bridge is staying in place (retention) and if it is resistant to fracture (durability).

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Roseman University of Health Sciences

South Jordan, Utah, 84095, United States

About this study

For patients missing an anterior tooth, the treatment options available include a dental implant, a removable partial denture, or a bridge. Some patients may not desire an implant due to the surgical nature, the limited bone available or the high cost. Removable partial dentures are relatively inexpensive but are undesirable for many patients due to the limited esthetics, trouble speaking and annoyance of an oral prosthesis. Traditional bridges use adjacent teeth as abutments and replace the missing tooth. However, these require the removal of 1-2 mm of tooth structure on adjacent teeth provide room for the porcelain of the bridge.

Decades ago, the option for a conservative bridge was primarily found in the Maryland bridge, which had two metal wings that were cemented or bonded on to two abutments. Though conservative, the Maryland Bridge did not enjoy a high reputation because of the high rate of debonding (falling off).

In the last several decades, the use of zirconia as a restorative material in dentistry has dramatically risen due to its toughness, resemblance in color to natural teeth, and affordability. Also, composite resin bonding agents (adhesive for dental fillings) have increased in strength and effectiveness. With these two advancements, the possibility of overcoming the some of the previous shortcomings with the Maryland Bridge is more of a reality.

The type of zirconia-wing bridge we are researching in this study has two wings which generally have three countersunk holes (meaning that the circumference of the outer portion of the hole is larger than the inner part of the hole). Composite resin (dental filling material) is placed in the holes as well as under and around the wings.

In summary, the zirconia-wing bridge presents a desirable alternative to traditional options for missing anterior teeth. With the advancements in resin-bonding and zirconia, this study seeks to examine how these combined elements can be used in the zirconia-wing bridge to maximize durability and retention in clinical scenarios.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Registered patient at Roseman University of Health Sciences in South Jordan, Utah who has undergone a health and dental screening
  • One missing anterior tooth
  • Adjacent teeth to the missing tooth must be non-restored or minimally-restored in with gums that have pockets of 4 millimeters or less
  • Fluent in English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are not registered at Roseman University of Health Sciences in South Jordan, Utah
  • Patients who are unable to attend 6-month recall appointments

Treatment and study plan

zirconia wing bridge

Other

The zirconia wing bridge consists of an artificial tooth made out of zirconia and porcelain on the front side with two zirconia wings that are bonded (glued) onto the back of the two adjacent teeth in the patient's mouth.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with bridges still bonded to the teeth (retention)

    Time frame: 2 years observation

    Determines how long the bridge stays bonded to the patient's teeth

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with bridges that have no fractures (durability)

    Time frame: 2 years observation

    Determine if there is any fracturing of the zirconia

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Roseman University of Health Sciences

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2030
First posted
May 7, 2020
Registry last updated
Apr 11, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.