Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04844697

Resilience and Coping in a Rare Skeletal Disease Population to Face Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak Distress: a Longitudinal Study

In the COVID-19 outbreak context, people living with rare diseases have been highly troubled with anxiety, loneliness, and depression. The project evaluates resilience and coping strategies to address pandemic impact by discussion in a dedicated focus group using a web-based platform. The goal is to improve, in a sustainable manner, the coping skills and psychological well-being of children, adolescents, and young adults affected by rare skeletal diseases.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

March 11th, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic accordingly with the spread and size of the infection.

The restrictions implemented by the governments have substantially changed people's lifestyles, facilitating the emergence of emotions such as fear, anxiety, and a sense of loneliness.

The age groups most involved by these burdens have been childhood, adolescence, and young adults. These groups have experienced dramatic changes in their daily life in order the relational, educational, and social networks. Nonetheless, these links outline the ideal environment for the development of resilience and the promotion of coping strategies to face traumatic events.

These lifestyle challenges and their consequences are even more evident in the context of the rare diseases since the outbreak containment measures have emphasized the troubles with which people affected by these conditions are daily forced to confront, in terms of access to care and treatments, resulting in increased stress and anxiety.

The current phase represents a sensitive step for the resumption of the activities in charge of the health and social service aimed at the citizens and especially to people with special needs, such as people suffering from rare diseases.

The pandemic experience has promoted new forms of meeting and contact between individuals using web-based platforms, playing a fundamental role in preserving the community and "sociality" dimensions.

In this scenario, the rare diseases could be an attractive model since the pandemic impinges over their bio-psycho-social characteristics at different levels. Resilience and coping strategies adopted by rare diseases patients could configure as an exemplum to face the psychological distress resulting from anti-pandemic measures, suggesting new approaches of taking charge by health service.

This study evaluates resilience and coping strategies to address pandemic impact by discussion in a dedicated focus group using a web-based platform. The goal is to improve, in a sustainable manner, the coping skills and psychological well-being of children, adolescents, and young adults affected by rare skeletal diseases.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Clinical and/or molecular diagnosis of Multiple osteochondromas; Clinical and/or molecular diagnosis of Ollier disease/Maffucci syndrome; Clinical and/or molecular diagnosis of Osteogenesis imperfecta; Consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Subject doesn't match the inclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Resilience

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline of the study

    Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89); 14 items; 4-point Likert scale (1=does not apply at all; 2=applies slightly, if at all; 3=applies somewhat; and 4=applies very strong); Score Resiliency Trait: 47-56 Very High, 35-46 High, 23-34 Undetermined, 11-22 Low, 0-10 Very Low

  2. Resilience

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 month

    Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89); 14 items; 4-point Likert scale (1=does not apply at all; 2=applies slightly, if at all; 3=applies somewhat; and 4=applies very strong); Score Resiliency Trait: 47-56 Very High, 35-46 High, 23-34 Undetermined, 11-22 Low, 0-10 Very Low

  3. Resilience

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 month

    Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89); 14 items; 4-point Likert scale (1=does not apply at all; 2=applies slightly, if at all; 3=applies somewhat; and 4=applies very strong); Score Resiliency Trait: 47-56 Very High, 35-46 High, 23-34 Undetermined, 11-22 Low, 0-10 Very Low

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anxiety

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline of the study

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15

  2. Anxiety

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 month

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15

  3. Anxiety

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 month

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15

  4. Depression

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline of the study

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15

  5. Depression

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 month

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15

  6. Depression

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 month

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); 14 items: 7 items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression; a 4-point (0-3) Likert-scale; Cutoffs for both HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression as >= 8, and for HADS-total >= 15

  7. Loneliness

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline of the study

    UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); 20-item scale; 4-point rating scale (1=Never; 2=Rarely; 3=Sometimes; and 4=Often); score ranging from 20 to 80.

  8. Loneliness

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 month

    UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); 20-item scale; 4-point rating scale (1=Never; 2=Rarely; 3=Sometimes; and 4=Often); score ranging from 20 to 80.

  9. Loneliness

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 6 month

    UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3); 20-item scale; 4-point rating scale (1=Never; 2=Rarely; 3=Sometimes; and 4=Often); score ranging from 20 to 80.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Exploring Resilience and Coping Strategies of Young Population in Response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Outbreak: a Longitudinal Study in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Rare Skeletal Disorders.

Acronym: RELOAD

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Apr 14, 2021
Registry last updated
Mar 1, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.