Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03416426

Residual Shunt After Patent Foramen Ovale Device Closure in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke

Among consecutive 47 cryptogenic stroke patients who underwent PFO closure, a serial follow-up bubble contrast TEE at 3 and 9 months after the index procedure was completed in 38 patients (81%, 46±10 years, 19 men). To evaluate the efficacy of PFO closure, the incidence of any- and significant residual shunt (≥moderate) was assessed.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The current investigation analyzed the date from the Gachon University Gil Medical Center PFO registry. Between March 2014 to February 2017, all consecutive 47 patients with ischemic stroke and PFO documented by bubble contrast with no other identifiable cause of the ischemic event, such as, carotid or intracranial artery stenosis, atrial fibrillation, and thrombus, or atheromatous plaque at the aortic arch (i.e. CS), were analyzed. PFO closure was determined according to the heart-brain team's discretion (the team consisted of an interventional cardiologist, an echocardiographer cardiologist, a neurologist, and a radiologist) based on clinical data, echocardiographic findings, and patients' preference. The Gore® Septal Occluder (WL Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, DE, USA) (n=19) and the Amplatzer® PFO occluder (St. Jude Medical, Inc. St.Paul, MN, USA) (n=19) and were used. The Occlutec® PFO occluder was used in one patient who were excluded from the analysis. The Institutional Review Board of Gachon University Gil Medical Center approved this study and all patients provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO documented by bubble contrast TEE

Exclusion criteria

patients with other identifiable cause of the ischemic event such as, carotid or intracranial artery stenosis, atrial fibrillation, and thrombus, or atheromatous plaque at the aortic arch

Treatment and study plan

Amplatzer® PFO occluder or Gore® Septal Occluder

Device

The closure procedure was performed under general anesthesia. After achieving femoral venous access, the PFO was crossed with a 5F multipurpose catheter, which was advanced into the left upper pulmonary vein and then exchanged over a 0.035 inch J-tipped stiff guidewire for an 8F or 9F guiding sheath. Procedural anticoagulation was initiated with 5000 units of intravenous heparin. After then additional heparin was administrated throughout procedure to maintain an activated clotting time of ≥250 seconds. Device size was selected based on TEE measurements of the distance between the PFO and the aortic root.

Primary outcomes

  1. Residual shunt rate at 9 months

    Time frame: 9-month follow-up bubble contrast TEE

    Incidence of significant residual shunt (≥moderate) was assessed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Residual shunt rate at 3 months

    Time frame: 3-month follow-up bubble contrast TEE

    Incidence of significant residual shunt (≥moderate) was assessed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gachon University Gil Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Residual Shunt After Patent Foramen Ovale Device Closure in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke: Serial Bubble Contrast Transesophageal Echocardiography Data

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Jan 31, 2018
Registry last updated
Jan 31, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.