Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00395447

REPLACE: Implantable Cardiac Pulse Generator Replacement Registry

The objective of this study is to prospectively estimate the all-cause complication rates at 6-months for patients undergoing generator replacement due to elective replacement indicator (ERI), advisory, or upgrade without a planned system modification or with a planned system modification. Secondarily, this study aims to compare the influence of baseline variables contributing to the all-cause complication rates for subjects undergoing generator replacement.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Device replacements occur for many reasons, including elective replacement indication (ERI), manufacturer advisory, and upgrade.

Recently pacemaker and implantable cardioverter (ICD) advisories have created a dilemma for both physicians and patients. While the risk of device malfunction is low, replacement rates following an advisory are usually high and complication rates following device replacement are not widely known. One retrospective analysis of ICD advisories in Canada reported an 18.3% replacement rate, and subsequent 8.1% complication rate directly related to the replacement.

Device replacements also occur in order to upgrade an existing system. Clinical studies have shown that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly reduces all-cause mortality and hospitalization in patients with advanced heart failure (HF). As a result of expanding indications for this therapy, many standard ICD patients are being upgraded to CRT-D systems. Complication rates related to upgrades of these systems are also not widely known.

To our knowledge, the risk of complications following a device replacement has not been studied prospectively in any patient population. Limited data are available to guide physicians when weighing the risks and benefits of device replacement.

This is a prospective multi-center study. 1750 patients at 100 clinical sites will be enrolled prior to generator replacement. Patients will be implanted and followed for 6 months to assess any complications related to the replacement procedure.

Patients with any legally marketed device for explant can be enrolled. The replacement device can be from any manufacturer.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Is able to give informed consent
  • Is identified for generator replacement without system modification or generator replacement including planned system modification, regardless of generator manufacturer
  • Is clinically stable to tolerate the surgical procedure
  • Age 18 years or greater
  • Is geographically stable and able to return to the investigational site for follow-up care through the six-month visit

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability or unwillingness to give informed consent
  • Current system infection requiring generator explantation or lead extraction
  • Generator replacement requiring planned lead extraction
  • Participating in another cardiovascular investigational drug or device registry
  • A life expectancy of less than six months
  • Expected to receive a heart transplant within 6 months
  • All vulnerable subjects as defined by the FDA Office of Human Research Protection or the local IRB providing oversight

Treatment and study plan

Straight-forward Device Replacement

Procedure

Device Replacement with Upgrade

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects Experiencing a Complication During Generator Replacement Without a Planned Lead Revision or Addition (Straight-forward Device Replacment) or With a Planned Lead Revision or Addition (Planned System Modification)

    Time frame: 6 months

    The percentage of subjects experiencing one of the pre-defined complications is presented. The percentage of subjects experincing a complication is presented separately for subjects with a straight-forward device replacment (generator replacement procedure plan did not include a lead addition or revision) and subjects with a planned system modification (generator replacement procedure plan did include a lead addition or revision).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Biotronik, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Assessment of the Complication Rate After Device Replacement Due to ERI, Advisory or Upgrade

Acronym: REPLACE

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Nov 3, 2006
Registry last updated
Apr 14, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.