NCT Number: NCT00395447
REPLACE: Implantable Cardiac Pulse Generator Replacement Registry
The objective of this study is to prospectively estimate the all-cause complication rates at 6-months for patients undergoing generator replacement due to elective replacement indicator (ERI), advisory, or upgrade without a planned system modification or with a planned system modification. Secondarily, this study aims to compare the influence of baseline variables contributing to the all-cause complication rates for subjects undergoing generator replacement.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Observational
Primary location
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
About this study
Device replacements occur for many reasons, including elective replacement indication (ERI), manufacturer advisory, and upgrade.
Recently pacemaker and implantable cardioverter (ICD) advisories have created a dilemma for both physicians and patients. While the risk of device malfunction is low, replacement rates following an advisory are usually high and complication rates following device replacement are not widely known. One retrospective analysis of ICD advisories in Canada reported an 18.3% replacement rate, and subsequent 8.1% complication rate directly related to the replacement.
Device replacements also occur in order to upgrade an existing system. Clinical studies have shown that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly reduces all-cause mortality and hospitalization in patients with advanced heart failure (HF). As a result of expanding indications for this therapy, many standard ICD patients are being upgraded to CRT-D systems. Complication rates related to upgrades of these systems are also not widely known.
To our knowledge, the risk of complications following a device replacement has not been studied prospectively in any patient population. Limited data are available to guide physicians when weighing the risks and benefits of device replacement.
This is a prospective multi-center study. 1750 patients at 100 clinical sites will be enrolled prior to generator replacement. Patients will be implanted and followed for 6 months to assess any complications related to the replacement procedure.
Patients with any legally marketed device for explant can be enrolled. The replacement device can be from any manufacturer.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Is able to give informed consent
- Is identified for generator replacement without system modification or generator replacement including planned system modification, regardless of generator manufacturer
- Is clinically stable to tolerate the surgical procedure
- Age 18 years or greater
- Is geographically stable and able to return to the investigational site for follow-up care through the six-month visit
Exclusion criteria
- Inability or unwillingness to give informed consent
- Current system infection requiring generator explantation or lead extraction
- Generator replacement requiring planned lead extraction
- Participating in another cardiovascular investigational drug or device registry
- A life expectancy of less than six months
- Expected to receive a heart transplant within 6 months
- All vulnerable subjects as defined by the FDA Office of Human Research Protection or the local IRB providing oversight
Treatment and study plan
Device Replacement with Upgrade
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Percentage of Subjects Experiencing a Complication During Generator Replacement Without a Planned Lead Revision or Addition (Straight-forward Device Replacment) or With a Planned Lead Revision or Addition (Planned System Modification)
Time frame: 6 months
The percentage of subjects experiencing one of the pre-defined complications is presented. The percentage of subjects experincing a complication is presented separately for subjects with a straight-forward device replacment (generator replacement procedure plan did not include a lead addition or revision) and subjects with a planned system modification (generator replacement procedure plan did include a lead addition or revision).
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Biotronik, Inc.
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
Prospective Assessment of the Complication Rate After Device Replacement Due to ERI, Advisory or Upgrade
Acronym: REPLACE
Important dates
- Study start
- 2007
- Primary completion
- 2009
- Study completion
- 2009
- First posted
- Nov 3, 2006
- Registry last updated
- Apr 14, 2015
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Assessment of Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk After CRT-D Replacement for Patients With Primary Prevention Indication
NCT02323503
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Biventricular Pacemakers, Artificial
Aalst, Belgium
View Trial DetailsA Comparative Study of Portable Patch-type Carotid Ultrasound CADFlow and Desktop Ultrasound Machines
NCT07197411
Device Replacement
Suqian, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsIntraoperative Continuous Terlipressin Infusion is Associated With Reduced Severe Postoperative Complications After Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: a Prospective Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study
NCT07719933
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsImpact of a Transmission Checklist in Post Anesthesia Care Unit on Immediate Respiratory Complications
NCT03972423
Anesthesia, Anesthesia Complication
Versailles, IDF, France
View Trial Details